MENU

686 Geode Thermagraph Pant Review

Michelle Weltig
ByMichelle Weltig
Sep 29, 2026
When you buy through our links, we may receive a commission.
Our Take:
4.7/5

The 686 Geode Thermagraph ($290) boasts strategically placed, powerful insulation that impressed us with its warmth in properly frigid temperatures. Its super-thick Infidry fabric also offers solid weatherproofing and better-than-expected durability for its mid-range price. The trade-off is a bulky, heavy build, and its warmth makes it ill-suited for boarders whose local conditions are generally mild.

Weather Protection

Weather Protection

4.5/5
Warmth

Warmth

4.5/5
Comfort

Comfort

4.5/5
Breathability

Breathability

1.5/5
Durability

Durability

5/5
Sustainability

Sustainability

2.8/5

Best for

Resort

Waterproofing

2-layer Infidry

Insulation

140g Infiloft

Fabric

225D x 150D Polyester

Pockets

6

Pros

Focused insulation in the seat and legs provides a ton of warmth for well-below-freezing conditions.
Uber-thick fabric that’s both plenty stormproof and will continue to rise to the occasion, even after lots of hard use.
The BOA-compatible system lets you adjust your boots without lifting your gaiters.

Cons

While its inner thigh vents provide some relief in milder conditions, it's too warm for a warmer late-season day.
Too heavy and substantial for those who like a lightweight, sleek pant.

For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Snowboard Pants.

I've used the 686 Geode Thermagraph in all kinds of rough weather, and it's proven reliable every time. That included big, sleeting storm days at Idaho's Schweitzer Mountain as well as howling 50 mph winds and pumping snow on Mammoth Mountain's 11,035-foot summit. No matter the conditions, my legs always stayed warm and dry. The 2-layer Infidry fabric clearly pulls its weight, and paired with a durable water-repellent (DWR) finish and fully taped seams, I'm not worried at all about anything penetrating through.

The 686 Geode Thermagraph also includes some helpful features to seal up any openings. Down by the cuffs are boot gaiters that block snow and are BOA compatible, meaning I can adjust my boots without exposing my lower legs to the elements. Waist adjustment tabs also keep the pant secure and snug around my waist without a belt while protecting me from anything sneaking in from above. In Pacific Northwest rain, it may not hold up as well as Gore-Tex, but that’s the only potential downside I can foresee (plus, you likely wouldn’t want insulated pants if it’s above freezing and raining anyway).

The Geode is a cold-weather warrior, perfect if you're heading out in mid-winter conditions and don't want to wear lots of layers. It boasts a toasty 140-gram Infiloft insulation, which is concentrated around your seat and knees as part of 686's body-mapping system. Wearing these pants with just basic leggings underneath, I never felt a single cold spot, even when temps dipped to 20 degrees with winds blasting up to 50 mph at Mammoth Mountain. I especially appreciated the insulation’s intentional distribution when sitting on heat-stealing chairlifts or in the snow.

Compared to my Burton Reserve 2L Insulated, the Geode is the clear winner. The Burtons have lighter insulation and struggled to keep me warm when the weather dropped into freezing territory (admittedly, I do run a little cold). The Geode is now my first choice for chilly resort days when I'm trying to stay as warm as possible.

The Geode is clearly designed for all-day resort comfort. The Infiloft face fabric has a bit of flex, and the polyester taffeta liner is super soft and cozy. When it came to overall fit, I have no complaints. Nothing felt constricted or rubbed awkwardly, and the articulated cut fit me well (more on this in the Fit and Sizing section below). There's also an internal waist adjustment and boot gussets for even more customization.

With all its insulation and protection, the Geode carries some heft. It's bulkier, thicker, and heavier compared to most other snowboard pants I've used, including the Burton Reserve, so if you prefer something thinner and lighter, this will feel like too much pant. Luckily, as long as you stick to downhill riding, these aren't major concerns, and whenever the temperature warrants the warmth the Geode provides, you can bet I'll be putting these on.

The 686 Geode Thermagraph is designed to thrive in cold, hard conditions, which makes breathability the biggest sacrifice you'll have to make. I've (regrettably) worn these in weather as warm as 50 degrees, and it didn’t take long for me to overheat. Even on a colder, sub-freezing day, if I'm in more advanced terrain and working hard, I can find these a bit stifling. In those situations, the internal thigh vents, which are about 9 inches long, came in handy for dumping heat and keeping me cool.

Clearly, these pants aren't meant for off-resort use, and personally, I probably wouldn't use them in weather over 40 degrees even for simple downhill laps. In those situations, I’d opt for the Burton Reserve if I still wanted some warmth, or ditch the insulation completely and reach for a shell.

With a super-thick 150-denier by 225-denier polyester cross-weave, the Geode Pant is thick and impressively hardwearing. On top of that are scuff guards and 500-denier reinforced inner hem fabric for extra defense. For reference, average snowboarding pants use far thinner 100-denier or lighter fabrics, so the Geode is well above average.

After over 40 days of riding in the Eastern Sierra and Selkirk Mountains, the signs of use are mostly minimal. There are a few loose threads on the outside of the cuffs, as well as some general wear and tear on the lower pant legs. Aside from that, there are no issues, and the zippers are working just as smoothly as day one. For the price, the Geode are impressively well-made, and I don't foresee needing a replacement anytime soon.

Select icon to view details:

Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon

Longevity

Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.

Pockets
I'm a big fan of the Geode's pocket layout. There are two handwarmer pockets, two cargo pockets, and two back pockets, all zippered and well-placed. One of the handwarmer pockets has a key clip, and all are large enough to fit a phone. The large pocket size was a big highlight for me and a rarity in most women's outerwear.

Waist Adjustment
The Geode features a hook-and-loop waist system, with straps on either side for easy adjustments. This was a nice touch for me personally, as the waist was initially about a half-inch too roomy. There's also a lift ticket eyelet on the belt loop, which gives you a convenient place to attach your pass without worrying about it falling out of a pocket.

Cuffs
The cuffs feature a scuff guard and extra-reinforced hem for durability. They're also gusseted, making it easy to slide your boot in when opened and keep the elements out after snapping closed. Finally, they feature a BOA-compatible boot system: the gaiter has an opening your boot's dial can slide through, so you can adjust quickly and easily. A hook-and-loop flap covers the opening to keep the weather protection intact.

Tester: 5’8”, 170 lb.; 32” waist

Size tested: Women’s Large

I typically wear pants in a large (for context, I’m a size 30 in jeans), which is what I ordered the 686 Geode Thermagraph in, and they fit me well. While it’s advertised as having a regular fit, I found it a little closer to baggy, which I actually liked. Nothing felt constricting, and there’s plenty of room for layering (though with its warmth, you shouldn’t need more than a simple base layer). The Geode also comes with several adjustment points, including the waist and the gusseted cuffs, which help everything feel secure on the body. Overall, they fit great, and I enjoyed wearing them all day—and all season—long.

Patagonia Insulated Powder Town ($289): More Tempered Insulation
The Patagonia Insulated Powder Town doesn't have the same furnace-like warmth as the Geode, but its balanced 60-gram synthetic is a nice match for most winter days. The Patagonia’s fit and styling are a little more conservative (this pant is popular among skiers, too), but there’s no knocking the build quality, which meets the brand’s usually high standards. You're not going to want to take either of these pants out in balmy weather, but with larger leg vents and less bulk, we give the slight overall edge to the Powder Town. To learn more, check out our Patagonia Insulated Powder Town review.


Burton Reserve 2L Insulated ($230): Cash Savings For the Occasional Snowboarder
If you're looking to save a bit of cash, the Burton Reserve 2L Insulated undercuts the Geode by a substantial $60. That said, the Reserve is less durable and water-resistant, and it cuts more corners, including using hook-and-loop flaps instead of zippers for most of its pockets. Its insulation is also thinner, which works against it in frigid weather but plays in its favor as temperatures rise. In terms of fit, both pants offer great mobility, but the Reserve is less substantial and lighter, which is a win if you don't like bulk. The Geode is the undisputed cold-weather champion, but fair-weather snowboarders can save with the Reserve. To learn more, check out our Burton Reserve 2L Insulated review.

686 Geode Thermagraph ($290)
Snowboarding towards camera in 686 Geode Thermagraph snowboard pant
4.7/5

For absolute warmth, it’s hard to beat the 686 Geode (women’s Quantum). This highly insulated pant is one of your best bets for staying toasty with minimal layering, paired with weatherproofing and durability to match. Though bulky, you won't feel restricted, but you’ll certainly overheat at the first sign of milder temperatures.

Best for
Resort
Waterproofing
2-layer Infidry
Insulation
140g Infiloft
Fabric
225D x 150D Polyester
Pockets
6
Icon

Weather Protection

4.5/5
Icon

Warmth

4.5/5
Icon

Comfort

4.5/5
Icon

Breathability

1.5/5
Icon

Durability

5/5
Icon

Sustainability

2.8/5
Patagonia Insulated Powder Town ($289)
Side fit view of Patagonia Insulated Powder Town Ski Pants
4.4/5

Patagonia’s mid-range insulated resort pants strike a nice balance: They’re warm but not too bulky, protective yet still soft and flexible, and both high-quality and affordable. But the in-house H2No membrane isn’t as reliable as Gore-Tex in very wet conditions.

Best for
Resort
Waterproofing
2-layer H2No
Insulation
60g synthetic
Fabric
150D polyester
Pockets
3
Icon

Weather Protection

4/5
Icon

Warmth

4/5
Icon

Comfort

4/5
Icon

Breathability

2/5
Icon

Durability

3.5/5
Icon

Sustainability

4.9/5
Burton Reserve 2L Insulated ($230)
Holding snowboard in Burton Reserve 2L Insulated snowboard pant
4.1/5

While the Reserve 2L Insulated's main appeal is value, it's still a reasonably built pant that’s decently durable and protective. 40-gram insulation also provides some (but not a ton of) warmth, and the relaxed fit is plenty comfortable. That makes it a great choice for occasional resort riders—just don't expect its performance to match up to more premium options.

Best for
Resort
Waterproofing
2-Layer Dryride
Insulation
40g ThermacoreEco
Fabric
Polyester
Pockets
6
Icon

Weather Protection

3.5/5
Icon

Warmth

3/5
Icon

Comfort

4/5
Icon

Breathability

3/5
Icon

Durability

3/5
Icon

Sustainability

4.3/5

Is the Geode Thermagraph for You?

Anyone who hates feeling cold while riding will find the 686 Geode Thermagraph's cozy build a blessing, and it’s built to withstand some of the worst that Mother Nature has to offer. That said, it’s arguably too primed for cold, nasty weather, and it may be too much pant for late-season or balmy days. Additionally, while its durability is top-notch, you pay a weight and bulk penalty. But for a reasonable $290, we consider it one of the better values in the insulated pant market.