Dakine Sequoia Gore-Tex Ski Glove Review
The Dakine Sequoia Gore-Tex (and men’s Titan equivalent) is a budget-friendly glove that offers a lot for just $94. Our tester appreciated the dependable Gore-Tex waterproofing, versatile feature set, and the inclusion of liner gloves—all uncommon at this price point. That said, the polyester shell and synthetic insulation mean it won’t last as long or feel as refined as a leather glove, and dexterity is average at best. For skiers who only get out a few days a year or want an affordable backup pair, the Sequoia is a solid value pick.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
Waterproofing
Gore-Tex
Shell
Synthetic
Cuff style
Gauntlet
Liner
Removable
Pros
Cons
Dakine Sequoia Gore-Tex
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Ski Gloves.
Most of my ski days this winter were in the mid-20s and snowy, and the Dakine Sequoia Gore-Tex kept my hands consistently warm and dry—even on long, cold chairlift rides where I expected to get chilled. The glove features High Loft Synthetic insulation (110g in the palm and 230g on the back of the hand), paired with a soft tricot backer. Additionally, it includes a removable midweight stretch-fleece liner. On colder days, I was glad for the added warmth of the liner, while on milder outings it was nice to have the option of running the glove without it.
As someone who typically skis in mittens, I was impressed with the Sequoia’s warmth for a glove. It’s not the best choice once temperatures dip much below the mid-teens—for that I’d reach for a beefier option like the Swany X-Cell or Black Diamond Mercury Mitt—but the included liner adds useful versatility. Even though the glove’s dexterity is solid, I liked knowing that if I pulled it off on the mountain to tackle finer tasks, my hand wouldn’t be bare to the elements. You can pair liner gloves with most ski gloves and mittens, of course, but the Dakine Sequoia Gore-Tex is designed to accommodate the extra bulk without compromising fit.
The Dakine Sequoia GTX features a synthetic shell with a PFAS-free, durable water-repellent finish, backed by a Gore-Tex membrane. I’ve always preferred synthetic gloves and mittens for wet conditions since they don’t absorb moisture like leather, and the Sequoia reinforced that preference. On wet, snowy days at Mt. Bachelor, the shell fabric shed water effectively, and my hands stayed dry from first chair to last. The gloves also offered excellent wind resistance, whether skiing at speed or sitting through gusty chairlift rides. Overall, I felt confident in the Sequoia’s weather protection, and the Gore-Tex insert was a reassuring safeguard in soggy conditions.
I do anticipate the Sequoia’s waterproofing will degrade as I put more mileage on the glove. Currently, the fresh DWR does an admirable job of keeping moisture from seeping through the shell, and the exterior still looks nearly new. But once abrasions set in, it’s game on for the waterproof membrane. While Gore-Tex is reliable, the Sequoia’s relatively thin build and average durability leave me less confident it will fend off moisture as effectively as a burlier synthetic ski glove or a well-maintained leather model (or a glove like the Black Diamond Guide, which combines the two materials).
The Dakine Sequoia GTX performed well in basic tasks—I could slip into pole straps, ski comfortably, and pull goggles on and off under my helmet without issue. That said, I had to take them off for finer tasks, such as adjusting zippers, pulling out my phone, or tightening boots. By comparison, higher-end leather models like the Swany X-Cell or Hestra Heli offer far better precision thanks to their superior fit and materials (once broken in, of course).
I did appreciate the Sequoia’s included liner gloves. While the extra layer actually reduced dexterity, it allowed me to perform small tasks—including operating a touchscreen—without fully exposing my hands to the cold. It’s not as effective as simply having a more dexterous glove, but it does add useful versatility and functionality to the overall package.
The Dakine Sequoia GTX delivers the level of comfort I’d expect from an $94 synthetic glove—above average, but not blow-me-away. For next-to-skin feel, you can choose between the soft tricot backer or the included fleece liner glove, both of which are soft and comfortable. I preferred wearing the Sequoia without the liner, where the fit felt less restrictive and the tricot interior was pleasantly cozy. Where the glove falls short is its polyester shell: It lacks the extension-of-skin feel of leather and never truly molds to the hand, leaving it a bit clunky. Overall, comfort is solid, but it doesn’t measure up to higher-end leather models.
For an $94 ski glove, the Sequoia’s build quality is slightly better than expected. The standout is the inclusion of a Gore-Tex liner, which feels like a luxury at this price. That said, with a polyester shell, a Rubbertec (read: non-leather) palm, and synthetic insulation, I expect noticeable wear after a season of use, and the fill is likely to pack out over time. A leather glove will almost always outlast it—and you can even find leather models at or below this price point, like the $50 Flylow Tough Guy, though without a waterproof liner. Still, the Sequoia’s clean stitching, thoughtful patterning, and well-chosen features make it feel like a clear step up from a budget glove. For the price, it represents very good value, even if its lifespan is limited.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
The Sequoia stands out for its long list of features, especially at this price point. Each glove features a zippered pocket on the back of the hand for a warmer pack, as well as a goggle wipe on the left thumb and a nose wipe on the right—both of which proved genuinely useful. Dakine also includes wrist leashes (a must-have for me on chairlifts) and traditional glove clips for pairing when not in use. The gauntlet-style cuff offered solid coverage over jacket sleeves and made slipping the gloves on and off easy. All told, the Sequoia packs in considerably more features than my old Kincos, and several of them—especially the leashes, wipes, and handwarmer pockets—felt practical in day-to-day use.
The Sequoia comes with removable fleece liner gloves, which add versatility but also bulk—when worn under the main glove, they felt overly tight. Most of the time, I opted to leave them behind. That said, they turned out to be perfect as standalone winter running gloves, so I actually just got two gloves in one!
Dakine offers the Dakine Sequoia GTX in three women’s sizes (small to large), while the men’s Titan version comes in five sizes (small to XL). My hand measures 6 inches from wrist to fingertip, and I tested a size Small. With my smaller hands, gloves are often too roomy, but these fit surprisingly well. The only drawback was when I paired them with the included liner gloves—they felt overly snug and restrictive, a gripe I’ve also heard from friends. Worn without the liners, however, the fit was spot on.
Outdoor Research Arete Modular GTX ($120): Real Leather
For a step up in durability and dexterity (and price), check out the OR Arete Modular Gore-Tex gloves. The Arete starts with a similar intention—a synthetic gauntlet ski glove—but executes it with a bit more panache thanks to its goatskin leather palm and fingertips. Over time, this pays dividends in terms of a hand-molding fit and more functional dexterity. However, the Arete’s liner is disappointing: It doesn’t perform well as a standalone piece (there’s exposed velcro at the cuff), adds a ton of bulk, and its touchscreen capabilities are far inferior to those of the Sequoia. Further, the glove doesn’t offer fun features like a goggle wipe or a pocket at the back of the hand. If we’re going for a mid-range glove, we’ll save our cash with the Sequoia, but it's undeniable that the Arete is the longer-lasting pick. For more, read our Outdoor Research Arete Modular GTX review.
Showa Temres 282-02 ($28): Save a Pretty Penny
If your top priorities are a fully synthetic build and a low price tag, the Showa Temres 282-02 is definitely worth considering. A spinoff of the famed Temres 282 “blue glove,” it’s essentially an insulated fishing glove with the addition of a gauntlet cuff (added after Showa caught on that climbers and skiers were using the design). Despite its humble origins, it’s surprisingly breathable, dexterous, and far more waterproof than the Sequoia. Add a liner glove, and warmth is nearly on par as well. If you don’t mind going off the beaten path, the Temres 282-02 is a quirky but highly effective budget glove—especially for those who ski in mild, wet climates.
A waterproof ski glove for just $94, with classic features as well as fun additions like a goggle wipe and back-of-hand pocket. Great for casual skiers and those who only get out a few times a year. However, the synthetic material is no match for the durability and refined fit of leather.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
We like the Arete Modular in theory, with its removable liner, tough shell, and competitive price. Unfortunately, subpar warmth and dexterity hurt its value proposition and make it a difficult glove to recommend for most resort and backcountry users.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
This iconic blue fishing glove has been adopted by the mountain community for its surprisingly good performance at a low price. It's reliably waterproof and—unlike most models—requires no maintenance. However, it’s prone to tearing and has no ski-specific features.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
Is the Sequoia GTX for You?
The Dakine Sequoia Gore-Tex (men's Titan Gore-Tex) is a strong value pick for budget-minded skiers or those who only get out a handful of times each season. No one will write home about the durability or dexterity of its polyester shell, but the premium Gore-Tex waterproofing and a healthy feature set are highlights at this price point.
Go for it if you want to save money but still get a ski glove loaded with features—liner gloves, handwarmer pockets, wrist leashes, and a Gore-Tex membrane.
Pass on it if you ski often in wet, slushy snow or very cold temps (mid-teens or below), need top-tier dexterity, or expect your glove to withstand heavy, daily use.
powder to the people
Skiing Gear Guides
Gear Guide
Best Ski Mittens of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Base Layers of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Helmets of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Boots of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Bibs of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Pants of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Backpacks of 2026
curated for you