Dakine Titan Gore-Tex Ski Mitten Review
The Dakine Titan Gore-Tex Mitt (women’s Sequoia) offers an impressive mix of warmth and waterproofing at a price that undercuts much of the Gore-Tex competition. This mitten is a smart choice for resort skiers who want reliable protection across a range of conditions without spending up for premium leather or ultra-durable builds. The Titan’s robust feature set is impressive for its price class ($94), and the removable liner adds welcome versatility (if it fits). It won’t hold up to consistent heavy use, though, and can’t match the warmth of more premium competitors.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
Waterproofing
Gore-Tex
Shell
Synthetic
Cuff style
Gauntlet
Liner
Removable
Pros
Cons
Dakine Titan Gore-Tex
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Ski Mittens.
Despite its reasonable price, the Dakine Titan Gore-Tex Mitt won’t leave you out in the cold. Its combination of 280-gram synthetic insulation on the back of the hand, 110-gram fill on the palm, and a removable midweight fleece liner provides more than enough insulation for most resort days. In practice, I found the Titan to be perfectly adequate for temperatures down into the teens—the mitten design helps with that, of course. The Titan stacks up well to the budget Montana mitten from The North Face ($65, and perhaps a tiny bit warmer) and the Outdoor Research Carbide Sensor ($130), but for ski days with temps in the single digits, I’d prefer to wear a warmer model like the Black Diamond Mercury or the Outdoor Research Mt. Baker II.
What really sets the Dakine Titan Gore-Tex apart from most other ski mittens in its price range, though, is the removable liner. On cold days, the liner glove offers a boost in warmth without making the mitten overly bulky, something the TNF Montana is guilty of. On warmer spring days, I ditched the liner entirely and was grateful for the drop in insulation. And when I needed to remove the shell to fiddle with buckles or zippers, I still had the liner glove to protect me from exposure—a small detail that adds up over the course of a full ski day.
The Titan’s waterproofing is outstanding for a sub-$100 ski mitten. It features a premium Gore-Tex insert—similar to the liner, a rarity in this price class—and it performed admirably in wet conditions. I wore the Titan on a slushy spring day at Washington’s Mission Ridge, and it kept my hands completely dry in sopping wet conditions. That kind of protection would be notable in a $150 mitten, let alone one that costs less than a Benjamin. For comparison, the TNF Montana’s proprietary DryVent waterproofing can’t keep up with Gore-Tex in truly trying conditions.
The Titan’s polyester shell is another plus here. You don’t need to fuss with leather treatments or conditioners, and it’s easy to maintain—just throw the Titan in the wash occasionally and reapply a durable water-repellent spray if needed. For skiers who want no-fuss waterproofing and don’t ride enough days to need full-leather durability, the Titan is an ideal balance of performance and ease.
As with any mitten, dexterity is limited, but the Dakine Titan Gore-Tex Mitt does better than most in this department. I was able to grip my poles, open snack bars, and even adjust my boot buckles with a bit of effort. The polyester shell is reasonably supple out of the box, and there’s no break-in period like you’d get with a stiffer leather model like the Hestra Fall Line or the Oyuki Sencho. (Those mittens are usually more comfortable and mobile when they’re broken in, though.)
Still, I had to remove the Titan for tasks that required finesse, such as opening vent zippers or tightening pack straps. That’s where the liner glove shines, though. Unlike the bulky hook-and-loop-attached liners in some ski mitts (like the Hestra Heli), the Titan’s stretch-fleece liner functions like a true glove and lets me handle fine motor tasks without exposing my skin (it even works on my touchscreen). I wouldn’t call the Titan dexterous by any stretch, but within the mitten category, it’s near the top of the pack.
The Titan’s comfort is deceptively high for a synthetic mitten. I was able to slide it on and off easily, aided by the wide gauntlet and lack of a fixed liner—something I appreciated every time I removed the mitten while on a lift. Compared to models like the Heli, which feature hook-and-loop patches at the opening that can snag and bunch, the Titan felt smooth and hassle-free.
Inside, the tricot lining is soft against bare skin, and the stretch-fleece liner is impressively plush. I wouldn’t expect this mitten to conform to my hand like a leather mitt might over time, but even out of the box, it felt more broken-in than I anticipated. For under $100, comfort isn’t always a guarantee, but the Dakine Titan Gore-Tex earns its stripes.
Durability is the most noticeable tradeoff in the Titan’s affordable design. While the build quality is solid, Gore-Tex membranes tend to be fairly resilient, the polyester shell and Rubbertec palm simply aren’t designed for heavy-duty wear, such as leather models or more premium synthetic designs like the Outdoor Research Mt. Baker II. I wouldn’t trust this mitt to hold up to a full season of rope tows, daily patrol work, or repeated bushwhacking.
That said, for most resort skiers—especially weekend warriors or those getting in under 20 days a season—it should be just fine. I didn’t see any signs of wear after several days on the slopes. However, if you’re particularly hard on your gear, you’ll want to opt for either a leather option like the Flylow Oven or a higher-priced ski mitten like the ones I mentioned above.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
Wrist Leash
Wrist leashes are a must-have feature on a mitten for me, and the Titan's get the job done. They’re removable, adjustable, and secure, unlike the flimsy, loose strap on The North Face's Montana. I never felt like the mittens were going to fall off, even when I let them dangle while sitting on the lift.
Back-of-Hand Pocket
This feature is well executed. The Titan’s zippered pocket is ideal for a hand warmer on frigid days or as a vent on warm days, but it also doubles as a convenient stash for your keys or a small snack. I tend to use my ski jacket pocket for those, but it’s nice to have the option.
Nose/Goggle Wipes
You get two separate wipes with the Titan—a fleece nose wipe on one mitten and a stiffer goggle wipe on the other. I mostly used the fleece patch for my nose and goggles, but the rigid option was handy when my lens iced up. It’s a smart, user-friendly touch that’s not always included at this price.
Dakine offers the Titan GTX in five sizes (S to XL) and the women’s Dakine Sequoia in three sizes (S to L). My hand measures 7.5 inches long, and I tested the Titan men’s size medium, which fit me well. The liner glove, however, was another story—it ran very small, to the point that I worried about tearing a seam just putting it on. I had to swap in a liner glove I already owned. The sizing mismatch is unfortunate, especially since the mitten itself was spot on. If you’re between sizes or concerned about liner fit, consider trying both options before making a decision.
The North Face Montana ($65): Even More Affordable Warmth
The TNF Montana costs even less than the Titan, but its insulation provides noticeably more warmth. However, the price/warmth combo is pretty much all that the Montana has over the Titan. It lacks a removable liner glove (and thus isn’t as versatile in warm weather), and we found it to be way less dexterous for simple tasks. Its proprietary DryVent waterproofing is also a cut below Gore-Tex (although still effective, to be fair), and it lacks a back-of-the-hand pocket. Both mittens are about as durable, which is to say mediocre in that department. Even though it’s $20 less, we’d pick the Titan over the Montana just about any day of the week. For a deeper dive, read our review of the TNF Montana Ski Mitts.
Flylow Oven ($55): Leather on a Budget
If you’re looking to save money, the Flylow Oven is a budget-friendly alternative that takes a different tack. Its all-leather exterior has a laid-back vibe and should outlast the Titan in terms of durability. However, the feature set is extremely bare bones: you only get a glove clip, with no waterproof membrane, gauntlet cuff, or back-of-hand pocket. For most entry-level skiers, those missing features will be hard to overlook, and the lack of waterproofing makes the Oven a poor choice for beginners or snowboarders who spend a lot of time with their hands in the snow. But if you mostly stay upright and want a simple, hardwearing leather glove at a bargain price, the Oven is a solid value.
Burton Gore-Tex ($85): Same Same, but Different
If you like the sound of the Titan but are partial to Burton, check out their Gore-Tex Mittens. The Burton offers an almost identical feature set, including a Gore-Tex membrane, liner gloves, gauntlet and wrist cinches, back-of-hand pockets, and removable leashes. While Burton doesn’t list its insulation fill weight, the feel is very similar to the Dakine in terms of warmth, loft, and flexibility. The differences are minor: The Burton has a horizontal pocket (the Dakine’s is vertical), an elasticized wrist cinch (we like the secure feel of this pull), and no goggle scraper on the thumb (just two nose wipes). The Dakine is ever so slightly the better value, but both mittens are great options for casual skiers who want to save some cash.
The Titan (women's Sequoia) gives you a fully featured, waterproof ski mitten for less than $100, with fun additions like a goggle scraper and back-of-hand pocket. It's great for casual skiers and those who only get out a few times a year. However, the material set is no match for the durability and refined fit of leather.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
The Montana is the most affordable waterproof mitten here. It has all the features most skiers need and is warm enough for most resort conditions. However, the synthetic shell won’t last as long as leather alternatives, and many of the features are poorly executed (although still functional).
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
The Oven is an affordable yet durable workhorse mitten. It's supple from the get-go and pre-treated with a durable water-repellent finish. However, don't expect too much warmth, and the mitten will soak through in wet conditions.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
Is the Titan GTX Mitt for You?
If you're looking for a versatile, affordable mitten that delivers exceptional weather protection and comfort, the Dakine Titan Gore-Tex Mitt is one of the best values on the market. With a versatile temperature range and a back-of-hand pocket for a handwarmer or venting, it’s primed for resort skiers who want one mitten that works in a wide range of conditions, from powder days to sunny spring laps. Just don’t expect it to hold up like a premium leather ski mitt, and be prepared to reach for a heavier mitten if the mercury plummets. But for casual skiers or anyone looking to gear up without overspending, this is one of our top picks.
pray for snow
Explore More Ski Gear
Gear Guide
Best Ski Gloves of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Helmets of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Pants of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Boots of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Backpacks of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Bibs of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Base Layers of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026
curated for you