Flylow Wolverine Ski Glove Review
The Flylow Wolverine ($120) is a premium glove made from goatskin leather and featuring a freeride-inspired undercuff design. Our tester praised its refined craftsmanship, high-quality materials, and excellent fit—standout qualities that elevate it above much of the competition. While the insulation is on the thinner side, the glove delivers reliable warmth for resort days in the 20s and above, and excels on ski tours where dexterity and breathability take precedence over bulk. The leather does demand a break-in period and regular maintenance, but the payoff is a glove that’s tough, supple, and built to last.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
Waterproofing
Yes
Shell
Leather/neoprene
Cuff style
Under cuff
Liner
Fixed
Pros
Cons
Flylow Wolverine
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Ski Gloves.
Given their thin build, I expected the Flylow Wolverine to be light-duty ski gloves best reserved for spring resort laps or high-output tours. Instead, I was pleasantly surprised by how much warmth they deliver. With 60 grams of Greenloft insulation and a wool-blend liner, they’re well-suited for resort skiing in temperatures around 20°F and above. I wouldn’t take them much colder unless I were ski touring, where uphill climbs generate plenty of heat and descents are short enough not to lose it. All told, the Wolverine strikes a strong balance between warmth and performance: not as toasty as the Black Diamond Spark and nowhere near as insulated as the Black Diamond Guide, but far less bulky and notably better for dexterity.
The Flylow Wolverine pairs a goatskin leather shell with a 10K/10K waterproof-breathable membrane—the baseline standard for waterproofing—plus a DWR finish. But with leather gloves, waterproofing always comes down to maintenance. While the membrane adds a safeguard against full saturation, soggy leather is still miserable to ski in. As the material abrades and wears in, it becomes increasingly permeable, so regular applications of Nikwax or similar treatments are essential (Flylow includes a packet to get you started). Even with upkeep, the Wolverine isn’t my top pick for consistently wet climates—I’ll save it for cold, dry days and switch to a synthetic glove when conditions get sloppy.
Like most leather ski gloves, the Wolverine comes with a break-in period. Out of the box, it feels stiff and slick, making it tough to grip skis, adjust zippers, or handle small tasks—I often just pulled them off rather than fight the “icicle fingers” sensation. But once the goatskin leather softens, the Wolverine’s excellent fit, pre-curved fingers, and relatively thin build translate to impressive dexterity: tightening ski boots, pulling goggles on and off, and zipping layers all feel easy (in contrast to pigskin or cowhide leather, goatskin is known for its dexterity). By comparison, the Black Diamond Spark is more supple on day one, but its thinner leather sacrifices long-term durability, whereas the Wolverine’s tougher build pays dividends down the road.
The Flylow Wolverine earns high marks for comfort once you get past the initial break-in. Its wool-blend liner is soft, warm, and free of the scratchiness you might expect from wool. Unlike the Black Diamond Spark, it’s securely anchored to the shell, making the glove easy to pull on and off without snagging or bunching. The neoprene cuff is one of my favorite features: it’s supple and cinches down nicely with an elastic Velcro tab, and on the inside, it integrates seamlessly with the rest of the glove using a continuous piece of wool-blend fabric. Finally, the overall fit feels natural and only improves as the leather loosens. It’s clear Flylow put real effort into refining the details, resulting in a glove that feels both dialed-in and genuinely comfortable.
The Wolverine feels every bit like a high-quality ski glove. The stitching is clean and strong, the goatskin leather and wool-blend liner are top-notch, and every component comes across as thoughtfully refined. Another Better Trail tester summed it up well, calling the glove “tough where you need it and supple where you want it”—a description that matches my experience. The build is on the thinner side compared to a burly glove like the Black Diamond Guide, but it’s still far more durable than Flylow’s budget Tough Guy (a glove that’s earned a reputation for surviving a full season of liftie abuse), which is built with less abrasion-resistant pigskin leather. Like a fine wine, the Wolverine should only improve with use—at least up to a point—but if maximum longevity is your priority, there are thicker leather options available.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
The Flylow Wolverine is a streamlined undercuff glove with a thin patch of padding across the back of the hand. It skips extras like leashes, removable liners, and storage pockets. In my opinion, the lack of leashes is the most significant oversight, as I find these incredibly useful for preventing my gloves from dropping onto the chairlift. The Flylow does include a small buckle to clip the gloves together and a suede thumb patch that doubles as a nose and goggle wipe. Finally, the undercuff design is the real highlight—arguably the best I’ve used. Its neoprene material is reminiscent of a drysuit cuff, and the stretchy velcro closure provides a great cinch. On the inside, it seamlessly integrates with the rest of the glove with a continuous soft wool-blended liner that feels comfortable and frictionless against the skin.
The Flylow Wolverine is available in four unisex sizes, ranging from Small to XL. My hand measures 7 inches from wrist to fingertip, and while the Medium felt a touch long in the fingers, the fit around my hand was excellent. The pre-articulated fingers further add to the dialed-in feel, making the Wolverine’s fit feel especially refined. One of Better Trail’s testers, who has spent significant time in both the Wolverine and the Black Diamond Spark, put it simply: the Wolverine fits far better.
Black Diamond Spark ($130): Shorter Break-In Period
The Spark is Black Diamond’s freeride-inspired ski glove and shares several similarities with the Wolverine. One of our testers wore the two gloves interchangeably for a season and offered strong opinions on how the models compare. The Spark, he noted, offered a less refined fit, with a poor connection between the liner and the shell, making it difficult to grasp items or get his hands in and out of the gloves. Its leather is also softer, making for a shorter break-in period but less durability. The nail in the coffin for him was the Spark’s cuff, which lacks the suppleness and stretch of the Wolverine and uncomfortably digs into the skin. For the same price, we give the edge to the Flylow. To learn more, read our Black Diamond Spark review.
Hestra Fall Line ($190): Warmer but Not Waterproof
If you like the under-the-cuff style, Hestra’s Fall Line is just about as premium as it gets. The Fall Line’s cowhide leather is softer than the Wolverine’s shell, takes very little time to break in, and has lasted us for six seasons (and running) of hard use. Its removable insulated liner offers a ton of warmth and is noticeably thicker than the Wolverine’s fixed insulation. Despite the added bulk, the Fall Line is the more dexterous glove, thanks to its supple leather, pre-curved fingers, and external seams that allow the glove to ride as snugly as possible against the fingers. It is worth noting that the Fall Line does not use a waterproof membrane, but this shouldn’t be an issue if you regularly maintain the leather. Of course, the Fall Line is significantly more expensive. For a deeper dive, read our review of the Hestra Fall Line.
This is Flylow’s freeride-inspired leather glove. The cuff design is better executed than much of the competition: It’s snug-fitting, has no pesky pressure points, and is easy to adjust. But with thin insulation, we don’t recommend these gloves for low-output, frigid days.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
This leather glove exudes freeride vibes, with an under-cuff design and back-of-hand padding that offers a nice middle ground between highly insulated gloves and pared-down leather models. Both the fit and finish, however, are unrefined, and the BD’s proprietary waterproof technology doesn’t provide the same protection as Gore-Tex.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
Thanks to a supple cowhide shell, pre-curved fingers, and outseams at the palm, the Fall Line is a highly dexterous glove. It’s durable, too: We’ve been wearing our pair for six years and it’s still going strong. But with no waterproof membrane, you won’t want to push it in wet conditions.
Warmth
Waterproofing
Dexterity
Comfort
Durability
Sustainability
Is the Wolverine for You?
The Flylow Wolverine is a refined freeride glove that blends quality goatskin leather construction, moderate warmth, and impressive dexterity in a streamlined undercuff design. It’s best suited for skiers who value a glove that breaks in beautifully, holds up well over time, and performs well in cold, dry conditions rather than soggy climates.
Go for it if you want a durable, well-crafted leather ski glove that strikes a balance between warmth and dexterity for mild resort days (20°F and above) and ski touring.
Pass on it if you need maximum insulation for frigid weather, a synthetic option for consistently wet conditions, or the no-holds-barred coverage of a gauntlet glove.
powder to the people
Skiing Gear Guides
Gear Guide
Best Ski Mittens of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Base Layers of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Helmets of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Boots of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Bibs of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Pants of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026
Gear Guide
Best Ski Backpacks of 2026
curated for you