The La Sportiva Akyra II ($159) isn’t your average hiking shoe, offering a focused blend of stability, support, and standout grip at a low weight. Its moderately stiff build is a boon in mountainous terrain, and the deep and tacky outsole is easy to trust. That said, the weight savings come with tradeoffs: durability is compromised by the thin upper, and the firm underfoot feel and tall collar won’t work for everyone. But for hikers and backpackers who tackle technical terrain and don't want to lug around a heavy boot, the Akyra II is a high-performing and confidence-inspiring option.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 9 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Mesh
Outsole
Frixion XT 2.0
Pros
Cons
La Sportiva Akyra II
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Hiking Shoes.
After a short break-in period, I quickly racked up miles in the La Sportiva Akyra II, using it as my everyday summer hiking shoe. Right away, it was clear this wasn’t your typical hiker: The Akyra feels firm underfoot, offering noticeably less shock absorption than plush alternatives or trail runners. The construction is also moderately stiff. On my first hike, which involved a mix of hiking and intermittent running, the stiffness proved fatiguing, and I wound up with sore feet after a 15-mile day.
However, on subsequent outings—focused more on rugged, mountainous terrain and hauling an overnight load—the shoe’s performance bent became much more of an asset. The supportive platform felt stable and trustworthy on rock, and the stiffness made more sense when moving through uneven terrain with weight on my back.
That said, if outright comfort is your top priority, there are plusher options available. Cushy hiking shoes, such as the Hoka Anacapa or Merrell Moab Speed, or trail runners like the Hoka Speedgoat, will feel much softer and less harsh underfoot. Additionally, I found the La Sportiva Akyra II’s tall and relatively stiff collar to be a minor issue. It sits a little too high on the ankle with only light padding, which led to pressure and some soreness during full days on the trail. After about 30 miles of use, the collar softened slightly and became less noticeable; however, it still remains a mild pressure point on longer hikes.
The Akyra II offers a solid, confidence-inspiring base that proved stable and trustworthy under heavy backpacking loads and in technical, off-camber terrain. Its relative stiffness and structure are most noticeable through the heel and midfoot, where the reinforced design provides excellent rollover resistance. In addition, the taller collar height—which rises partway up the ankle rather than sitting below it like most hiking shoes and trail runners—adds a small but noticeable boost in stability.
On a family backpacking trip, I hauled a couple of kids' worth of gear and had my pack weighing in at over 40 pounds. Even under that strain, the Akyra retained its shape and stayed supportive, resisting collapse during creek crossings and over uneven rock. Factoring in its relatively low weight, the shoe’s above-average support is even more impressive. Compared to the trail runners I typically wear—even burlier models like the Brooks Cascadia—the Akyra feels far more structured and capable when the terrain gets rough or the pack gets heavy.
La Sportiva consistently delivers when it comes to traction, and the Akyra II is no exception. Featuring aggressive, stud-like lugs that measure 5.5 millimeters tall (for reference, most hiking shoes are closer to 4mm), the Akyra offers fantastic bite in soft conditions. I found it easy to trust on muddy and slimy dirt trails, especially during steep descents where the substantial heel lugs provided excellent braking power. On a 1,500-foot descent during a day hike in Washington’s Enchantments, I broke into a run and found the grip to be almost laughably good.
The in-house Frixion outsole features a dual-compound design: a tackier, softer rubber is placed at the center of the sole for enhanced grip on rock, while a tougher, more durable compound lines the perimeter for improved longevity. Combined with the deep, well-spaced lugs, the Akyra’s traction has been exceptional across the board, from scree fields to big boulder scrambles, light snow, thick mud, and dusty mid-summer hardpack. Few shoes I’ve tested have felt this confidence-inspiring across such a wide range of terrain.
In the pursuit of cutting weight, the La Sportiva Akyra II sacrifices some durability. On the positive side, the outsole has proven to be impressively hardwearing, and its sheer thickness gives it a notable boost in longevity compared to smaller-lugged alternatives. Additionally, there’s very little exposed foam at the midsole; instead, La Sportiva armored the midsole with firm plastic, and after extended use, it has shown only light cosmetic scuffs.
The upper is primarily made of airy and breathable mesh, but reinforced strategically with a webbing-like overlay of rubbery material, along with a solid toe cap and heel counter. This design is a clear step up from typical trail runners that rely on thin mesh. However, despite these reinforcements, the Akyra still leaves a fair amount of open-weave mesh exposed, and I started collecting holes fairly early in testing. The mesh over the toes has proven to be a particular weak point, and after a season of use, I’ve accumulated a few small tears. While these punctures haven’t fully worn through to the inner lining yet, they have grown slightly over time. Compared with a leather upper or a more tightly woven mesh design, the Akyra clearly falls short. Whether the weight savings and breathability trade-offs are worth it will depend on your priorities.
The La Sportiva Akyra II strikes a balance between a trail runner and a traditional hiking shoe in terms of protection. The toe cap is moderately thick and wraps fully around the toes—a nice upgrade over most trail runners that often leave sections exposed. I’ve taken some direct hits while wearing the shoe, and while it’s not as confidence-inspiring as the burlier cap on Salomon’s X Ultra 5, it’s thick enough to absorb most impacts.
It’s a similar story at the heel, where moderate reinforcements and light padding around the collar provide a reasonable amount of coverage. However, the sides of the foot are more vulnerable due to the thin mesh upper, and I’ve had a few painful brushes while squeezing between rocks. Underfoot, the Akyra’s stiff construction does a good job of dulling sharp impacts from rocks and roots, though foot fatigue can add up more quickly compared to cushier alternatives. Overall, La Sportiva struck an appropriate middle ground here: The Akyra offers enough protection for technical day hikes and light backpacking, but if you prioritize maximum armor for rough terrain, a more traditional hiking model will serve you better.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
La Sportiva lists the Akyra II at 1 pound 9.6 ounces, and my men’s size 9 came in almost exactly on target at 1 pound 9.5 ounces on my scale. Within the hiking shoe market, that places it a few ounces heavier than a trail runner like Brooks’ Cascadia 19 (1 lb. 5.4 oz.) but lighter than more traditional hiking shoes like Merrell’s Moab 3 (2 lb. 1 oz.) or Adidas’ Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 (1 lb. 13 oz.).
On the trail, the Akyra II made it easy to rack up miles—as long as I wasn’t pushing into running territory, where the shoe’s stiffness became more noticeable. It’s certainly not as nimble or quick as a true trail runner, but the boost in stability and protection is undeniable. For hikers and backpackers venturing into rougher, more technical terrain, the slight weight penalty will be a worthwhile trade-off.
I wore my typical men’s size 9 in the La Sportiva Akyra II and was very pleased with the overall fit. Length-wise, it ran true to size, and I experienced no issues with sliding forward or banging my toes during long, steep descents. La Sportiva describes the last as a medium/wide fit, but I’d characterize it more as a regular width—consistent with La Sportiva’s reputation for running on the narrower side (with exceptions like their TX line).
The toe box provided ample room for my average-width foot to breathe during long trail days, while the snug heel kept me securely locked in, even during extended climbs and technical traverses. The lacing system was reliable and required no mid-hike adjustments, helping round out a fit that feels performance-oriented without being overly restrictive.
Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX ($170): A Beefier, More Traditional Hiker
If you’re looking for a rugged, backpacking-ready shoe, the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX is a compelling alternative to the Akyra II. Compared to the Akyra, the X Ultra feels slightly stiffer underfoot and provides more protection along the sides of the foot. On the other hand, the Akyra has better traction on rock and moves faster over technical ground thanks to its lower weight and tackier outsole. Both shoes are overkill for casual trails, but for backpacking and serious day hikes, it comes down to priorities: more structure and security with the Salomon, or quicker handling with the Akyra. For more, read our review of the Salomon X Ultra 5.
Brooks Cascadia 19 ($150): Softer and More Forgiving
If you prioritize comfort for big-mile days, the Brooks Cascadia 19 is the better pick. This trail runner features a noticeably softer midsole that effectively absorbs impacts and provides a lighter, more forgiving feel on the trail. The Akyra, by contrast, is firmer, stiffer, and far more supportive for carrying a heavy pack or tackling technical, rocky terrain. Both shoes offer excellent traction and trail performance, but the Cascadia is more approachable for casual hikers and fast movers (including thru-hikers). If you’re heading into rugged mountain environments or prefer a little extra precision and protection, the Akyra comes out ahead.
A performance shoe through and through, the Akyra II mixes stability and toughness in a surprisingly low-weight package. The shoe’s aggressive outsole grips exceptionally well on everything from rock to mud, but the firm feel underfoot isn’t particularly comfortable on high-mileage days.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Salomon’s popular lightweight hiker offers a nice balance of agility, protection, and durability for everything from easy trails to cross-country travel. It’s not as soft and cushioned as a trail runner, and the fit runs narrow, but it’s otherwise a top all-around performer.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
A legend in the thru-hiking world, Brooks’ Cascadia eats up trail miles thanks to its balanced weight, stability, and grip. Unfortunately, its trail running roots mean you give up toe protection, and the shoe’s thin mesh upper and exposed foam midsole can quickly collect damage.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
The La Sportiva Akyra II is an excellent choice for hikers and backpackers who prioritize traction, stability, and protection in technical terrain. Its stiff and supportive build inspires confidence under heavy loads and on off-camber trails, and the aggressive outsole is one of the grippiest we’ve tested. However, the tradeoffs are real: the Akyra isn’t especially plush underfoot, its durability lags behind leather or reinforced mesh designs, and the high ankle collar can cause some discomfort on longer days. If you stick to moderate trails and value cushioned, out-of-the-box comfort, a softer and more forgiving hiking shoe might be a better match. But for demanding adventures in rugged mountains, the Akyra II is a standout performer.
it's trail o'clock
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026curated for you