Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate/rugged
Weight
1 lb. 8 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Hiking Boots.
When I first laced up the Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX, I turned to my hiking partner and said, “This is going to be a long day.” Right out of the box, the boot felt narrow, stiff, and uncushioned—definitely not love at first step. But by mile two, I wasn’t thinking about the fit anymore, and by mile seven, it actually felt comfortable. All told, while there’s a bit of a break-in period, the Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather doesn’t take long to soften up. That said, it’s certainly narrow—my slightly wide feet (which fit fine in most shoes) feel like they’re maxing out the available space.
Given its roots in mountain running, the La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II Mid leans minimalist in design, with thin padding in the collar and tongue and a firm, low-profile underfoot feel. It’s more functional than plush, but depending on your style, that might be your version of comfort. And while it’s a leather hiking boot on paper, the Ultra Raptor feels more like a trail runner with ankle support than a traditional synthetic hiking boot like the TNF Offtrail Hike LT Mid GTX. The leather upper is supple, and the cut-out at the back of the ankle helps facilitate an easy, unhindered stride.
The Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX is more akin to a lightweight synthetic hiking boot than a burly leather model when it comes to stability. The flexible sole and supple upper make it feel more like a beefed-up trail runner than a traditional hiking boot. Most hikers wouldn’t reach for this boot to kick steps in snow, and it lacks the tank-like support many prefer for sidehilling across scree or talus fields. That said, the burly heel stabilizer adds noticeable structure, helping me feel confident and planted on steep descents and even plunge-stepping in snow.
Despite not being as stiff as a classic leather hiking boot, the firm platform and precise fit were ideal for me on technical terrain: jumping boulders, crossing talus fields, and smearing up slabs—all of which I put to the test on obscure routes around the Chaltén Massif in Argentine Patagonia. Personally, I like having some ground feel and flexibility, so while the Ultra Raptor doesn’t get top marks for stability, it’s a great match for hikers who prioritize agility over sheer support. It won’t bulldoze through terrain like a Salomon Quest 4 GTX or Lowa Renegade Evo GTX, but for those who know how to move precisely, it’s quick and responsive.
I’ve long been a fan of the synthetic low-top Ultra Raptor, using it for approaches and mixed run-climb objectives like Mount Goode—a 40-mile trail run with 2,500 feet of low-fifth-class climbing. The leather mid-height version carries the same DNA, offering a nimble, technical alternative to traditional hiking boots.
When I first saw that the mid-height Ultra Raptor used Vibram FriXion XT 2.0 (blue blend) instead of the super sticky FriXion White, I was a little disappointed. The white compound is one of my favorites for its incredible hold on rock, and I assumed the blue blend—chosen for better durability—would come at the cost of grip. But after testing, I found that the Ultra Raptor Mid’s outsole still delivers nearly the same level of confidence on technical terrain.
The Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather’s tread pattern is dialed for mixed terrain, balancing approach-shoe-like grip on rock with sharper lugs that dig into wet and loose surfaces like mud, snow, and damp leaves. For boulder hopping, crossing talus, and running up slabs, it performs as well as a dedicated approach shoe like the La Sportiva TX Guide—with the added perk of better traction in soft terrain. All in all, it boasts some of the best all-around traction of any hiking boot I’ve tested. Whether scrambling up slabs or navigating a slick, muddy trail, I wear it with confidence. In fact, I seriously considered using it as my approach shoe for climbing in the Fitz Roy Massif during my stint in El Chaltén, though, in the end, I opted for the TX Guide for its lighter weight.
Thanks to its leather upper, the La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II Mid offers better abrasion resistance than most lightweight synthetic hiking boots. But don’t let the leather build fool you—it’s nowhere near as burly as a stiffer leather model like the Lowa Renegade Evo GTX. You do get a rubber toe cap, foam heel protector, and TPU stabilizer at the heel, which add some protection compared to a pared-down lightweight hiker, but they don’t make this an ultra-rugged design.
The thin and supple nature of the leather gives me pause in rating durability too highly. After just a few dozen miles of trail time, the boot has softened significantly, and the leather has already scuffed in high-wear areas. Even compared to my La Sportiva TX Hike Leather GTX—which I put through much harsher conditions while hiking the Ptarmigan Traverse—the Ultra Raptor shows more rapid breakdown. While it gets high marks for agility and performance on technical terrain, I don’t expect it to hold up as long as most leather competitors.
The Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX features a rubber toe cap, foam heel protector, and TPU stabilizer at the heel. But it’s far from a heavily armored boot: While these elements provide a noticeable boost in protection compared to trail runners or lightweight hikers, hikers used to burlier boots will likely find the Ultra Raptor a little lacking when it comes to shielding against sharp rocks and rugged terrain. The sides of the boot, particularly around the midfoot, feel thin and unreinforced—largely due to the supple leather upper. I’d confidently move through scree or talus in this boot, but this is terrain that I’m accustomed to navigating in trail runners or approach shoes. For hikers who want true foot armor, a tank-like boot like the Salomon Quest 4 GTX or Lowa Renegade Evo GTX would be a far safer bet.
One area where the Ultra Raptor Mid does offer some added assurance is ankle protection. The ankle collar provides more coverage than a low-cut trail runner, and interestingly, the padding is placed on the exterior rather than the interior—seemingly designed more for protection than comfort. This strategic padding placement helps shield the bony part of the ankle from trailside impacts, a thoughtful touch for navigating rugged terrain.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
At 1 pound 8 ounces for the women’s version, the Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX is one of the lightest hiking boots I've tested. It’s so nimble that I could actually run in it, and after testing it back-to-back with the TNF Offtrail Hike LT, I was blown away by how much lighter the Ultra Raptor felt.
Of course, cutting weight comes with trade-offs. The Merrell Moab 3 Mid (1 lb. 11.1 oz.) is noticeably clunkier and less capable on rock but offers the protection, durability, and comfort most hikers expect from a leather boot. The Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid (1 lb. 13.4 oz.) adds extra ounces for plush cushioning, making it a great choice for all-day comfort at the expense of agility. And a burly boot like the Lowa Renegade Evo GTX (2 lb. 2.2 oz.) is about as good as it gets for stability, protection, and durability. The closest comparison is the Merrell Moab Speed 2 Mid (1 lb. 8.7 oz.), a synthetic design that feels more stable underfoot but lacks the Ultra Raptor’s sleek build and prowess on rock. If you value a nimble yet capable mountain boot, the Ultra Raptor II Mid stands apart—but if you want more structure or support, you may want to look elsewhere.
I tested the women’s Ultra Raptor II in a size 8.5 (EU 40) and found the length spot-on—I’m typically between an 8.5 and 9, and the smaller size fit me well. That said, I just about maxed out the width, and it’s worth noting that this is a fairly narrow boot. Unfortunately, La Sportiva doesn’t offer the Ultra Raptor Mid in wide sizes, so those with wider feet may want to look at alternatives like the TX Hike Mid, which offers a more accommodating fit.
La Sportiva TX Hike Mid Leather GTX ($199): A More Forgiving All-Rounder
The TX Hike Mid Leather GTX shares some DNA with the Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX but caters to hikers who prioritize comfort and versatility over a nimble, locked-in feel. Its suede leather upper is softer and more forgiving, requiring no break-in period, while the fit is noticeably wider—something to consider if you found the Ultra Raptor Mid too snug. It also trades the Ultra Raptor’s FriXion outsole for Vibram Megagrip, which is equally sticky on rock but has a different tread pattern. That said, the TX Hike Mid isn’t as precise or agile underfoot and lacks the distinct trail-runner feel of the Ultra Raptor. It’s a better all-around pick for backpackers looking for a lightweight yet supportive boot, but for speed and technical terrain, the Ultra Raptor still takes the lead. For more, read our review of the La Sportiva TX Hike Mid GTX.
Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX ($180): Stability Over Agility
Despite weighing nearly the same as the Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX (1 lb. 8.7 oz. vs. 1 lb. 8 oz.), the Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX has a very different personality. It’s more of a stable hiking shoe turned hiking boot, offering a beefier, planted feel with a synthetic upper that fits wider feet right out of the box. The Moab Speed 2 is also notably more comfortable from day one, with plush cushioning and a roomier toe box. However, it lacks the Ultra Raptor’s precision on technical terrain and isn’t quite as adept on rock, with less grippy traction. While the Ultra Raptor wins for agility and scrambling, the Moab Speed 2 offers traditional hikers a more comfortable, structured ride. For the complete story, read our Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX review.
The Ultra Raptor is a nimble, lightweight hiking boot that blends the agility of a mountain running shoe with the durability of a leather upper and ankle support. While it excels on technical terrain on the foot of the right pilot, its flexible build and minimal cushioning may feel lacking for those accustomed to more structured leather boots.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
A spin-off of La Sportiva’s popular TX approach shoes, this minimalist leather boot is surprisingly capable in most terrain and conditions. You can find more protective or rugged models, but we appreciate the balance of comfort and performance of the TX Hike Mid.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Merrell goes modern with the Moab Speed 2, combining lightweight design, plush cushioning, and unexpectedly strong support. You sacrifice some protection and durability, but it’s hard to beat this boot’s comfortable and athletic feel.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
The La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX is best for hikers who want the agility and precision of a trail runner but with added ankle support and a more durable leather upper. Its lightweight build and sticky outsole make it an excellent choice for those comfortable traveling quickly in technical terrain, from scrambling over boulders to navigating rocky trails. However, it lacks the plush cushioning and tank-like stability of a more traditional leather hiking boot, making it less ideal for long-mileage days or carrying heavy loads. The narrow fit will also be a dealbreaker for some, and with no wide sizes available, those with broader feet may want to look elsewhere. If you prioritize nimbleness over maximum support and prefer a locked-in, trail-runner-inspired fit, the Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX is a capable, confidence-inspiring option.
hit the trail
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026curated for you