The Mammut Nirvana 28 ($190) looks like a backcountry workhorse at first blush. It certainly nails a few key design elements, too, including its pocket layout and construction with rugged materials. In practice, though, this pack felt unsupportive and unwieldy when we loaded it up, which makes it hard to recommend for anything more than quick, low-output backcountry laps. For mechanized-accessed skiing or shorter days in the skin track with light loads, the Nirvana might work—but in the end, it didn’t win us over, and there are better options on the market.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Versatility
Durability
Weight
Sustainability
Weight
2 lb. 5.7 oz.
Capacities
28L (18L, 22L, 35L)
Avalanche tool pocket
Yes
Fabric(s)
Nylon-polyester blend
Pros
Cons
Mammut Nirvana 28
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Ski Backpacks.
I was overall disappointed with how the Mammut Nirvana 28 felt on my back, which is far from ideal for a ski pack that is supposed to be worn all day. I’ll admit that, during quick hikes and while I was carrying light loads, comfort wasn’t an issue. The Nirvana has decent padding along the backpanel and shoulders, and the hipbelt has small padded wings where it connects to the backpanel. But as soon as I packed the Nirvana for a real tour—including items such as a probe, shovel, first aid kit, extra layers, skins, water, and snacks—the pack’s structural issues became obvious. It lacks an internal frame or framesheet (supportive features that the Osprey Soelden 32 and Raide LF 30L both have), or even an adequately stiffened backpanel (as found in the Ortovox Switchback 32).
Instead, the backpanel bulged against my spine, and the pack pulled away from my body instead of wrapping around it. On the ascent, I noticed how top-heavy the Nirvana felt. Even though I was carrying less than 20 pounds, the lack of support made the pack feel much heavier than it was. No real load transfer, and a hipbelt made primarily of thin webbing, meant the weight stayed on my shoulders, no matter how many times I adjusted the straps. On the descent, things didn’t improve—the pack pushed my weight into the backseat and threw off my balance, especially when skiing variable snow or trying to move quickly through tight terrain. Compared to the ski backpacks mentioned above—or even the much smaller Black Diamond Dawn Patrol 15— the Mammut Nirvana 28 simply didn’t ski (or ascend) as well when it was loaded. The structure just wasn’t there.
Compared to its comfort rating, the Mammut Nirvana does pretty well in this category. Its pocket layout is intuitive, providing fast and easy access to all the essentials. I liked the wide top zipper and full backpanel access to the main compartment, which made it easy to find buried items without dumping the whole pack’s contents in the snow. The separate avy tool pocket is excellent—it’s spacious, opens wide, and includes sleeves for your probe and shovel shaft, plus a helpful graphic reminding you what to carry.
Two zippered top pockets keep small items sorted—one is lined with soft material to accommodate goggles, and the other is perfect for snacks or sunglasses. The Mammut Nirvana’s helmet carry system tucks away into a dedicated pocket on the bottom when you’re not using it, and there's internal hydration reservoir routing (through a hole in the main compartment) that worked well with my setup. All told, its organizational layout makes it a great ski backpack for transition-heavy day touring.
The pack’s ski carry includes both diagonal and A-frame options (as well as vertical snowboard carry), and I appreciated the beefy tail straps for the A-frame setup, though they barely fit my skis’ 123-millimeter-wide tails. I also missed having a small zip pocket on the hipbelt for sunscreen or a quick snack—one of the few true oversights in an otherwise dialed layout, and another feature the Osprey Soelden, Raide LF, and Ortovox Switchback all have.
The Mammut Nirvana 28 is designed for single-day backcountry tours, but in my experience, it’s better suited to snowmobile- or helicopter-accessed skiing or short resort-adjacent missions. When packed lightly, as you’d do for those types of outings, it’s fine—and honestly, for snowcat skiing or heli drops where you're not carrying much, it could work well due to its organization and durability. However, if you plan to skin 2,000-plus vertical feet or need to bring multiple layers, water, and avy gear, the saggy feel and lack of structure will catch up with you.
I wouldn’t use the Nirvana for more technical ski mountaineering, either. It features dual ice axe loops, but lacks an easy crampon carry, and the diagonal ski loop orientation feels limiting.
For a better blend of comfort, volume, and support, I recommend the Ortovox Switchback. And if you're picking up a pack for non-human-powered skiing, the 22-liter version of the Nirvana might be a better bet. It features the same layout as the Nirvana 28 in a smaller, more manageable build that works better as a hybrid in-bounds resort pack.
No complaints here. The Nirvana’s 90% nylon, 10% polyester outer fabric feels bomber, and after a couple days of rough use—including some skinning, bootpacking, and lounging in a muddy parking lot—the pack still looked close to new. (Just a few dirt stains that wiped off easily.) The plastic buckles are fairly standard, but they’re holding up just fine.
Of course, the Nirvana isn’t as rip-resistant as Dyneema models such as the LF or the Hyperlite Mountain Gear Headwall 55, but it also costs less than half the price of those ski backpacks. I’m hesitant to call this pack a good deal due to its comfort and support issues, but from a construction quality standpoint, it gets the job done. If you’re hard on your gear and need a pack that can take a beating, this one should go the distance.
There’s not a huge spread in weight among core day touring packs, and at 2 pounds 5.7 ounces for the 28-liter size, the Nirvana lands squarely in the middle of the pack. For comparison, the 32-liter Osprey Soelden clocks in at 2 pounds 8 ounces, and Black Diamond’s Cirque 35 (with even more capacity) weighs 2 pounds 6.1 ounces. While the Nirvana makes compromises in areas like comfort, its weight-to-capacity ratio is competitive and respectable for the category.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Repair Services
Repair services extend the lifespan of outdoor gear and reduce overall consumption, though programs vary widely. Some brands offer comprehensive repairs for a range of issues, while others provide limited or no repair support. A green check mark indicates a robust repair program, a yellow check mark indicates limited repair services, and a red X indicates the brand does not offer repair services.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
I have an 18-inch torso, and I tested the Mammut Nirvana 28 in a size medium, which usually fits me well. I couldn’t quite get this pack to sit right, though. The torso length felt a little too long, and the bottom of the pack kept bumping into my tailbone. The shoulder straps felt unusually wide and didn’t contour to my body well, even when cinched tight with the chest strap. I wanted more adjustability to bring the load closer to my back, but the Nirvana doesn’t have load lifters or upper strap tuning like a backpacking pack would. Bottom line: It felt like this pack was made for someone significantly larger than I am.
Ortovox Switchback 32 ($240): Superior Support System
The Switchback 32 is one of our favorite ski touring packs, period, and when compared to the Nirvana, what really stands out is the difference in structure. The Switchback has a stiff foam backpanel that provides much better support, and our tester (the same one who used the Nirvana) was easily able to carry 30 pounds up the skin track without any discomfort. On the descent, the Switchback’s more streamlined shape was a big improvement over the Nirvana’s bulk. This pack is more expensive, but it’s also more feature-rich, with a hipbelt pocket, a rope clip on the top, and even a shoulder strap pocket. Our tester had some minor grievances with the Switchback’s avy tool compartment size and its lack of top access to the main compartment (it’s backpanel only), but in terms of feel, it easily outstrips the Nirvana. To learn more, check out our Switchback 30 S review.
Osprey Soelden 32 ($190): Better Price for a Better Pack
This pack costs only $10 less than the Nirvana, but the Soelden (women’s Sopris) presents much better value. Its backpanel has thick, comfy padding that’s bolstered by a wire perimeter frame, meaning it carries weight much better than the floppy Nirvana. The Soelden also features padded hipbelt wings (there’s a pocket on the left-hand one) that help prevent undue movement—like the Switchback, this pack just flat-out feels better than the Nirvana on both the ascent and the downhill. While this is a very well-rounded pack, its previous iteration might not have matched the Nirvana’s durability. However, Osprey redesigned the Soelden with stronger materials; we haven’t tested the new version yet, but we can safely say that we’d still pick it over the Nirvana. For more, read our review of the Soelden 32.
The Nirvana 28 lands on the smaller side of the touring pack continuum. Although it has the organization you need for a day in the backcountry, we found that its support isn’t up to par. Its price is decent, but in most cases, we’d recommend another model.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Versatility
Durability
Weight
Sustainability
The Switchback is one of the most well-rounded ski packs we’ve tested. It’s sized just right for run-of-the-mill single-day tours, but it has a feature set that can handle more vertical endeavors. There are a couple of design quirks, though, and some competitors cost less.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Versatility
Durability
Weight
Sustainability
The Soelden (women’s Sopris) has held a treasured place in the minds—and gear closets—of backcountry enthusiasts for years. It’s a great fit (both figuratively and literally) for the majority of skiers and riders, and it just received a welcome update. Some small design drawbacks persist, though.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Versatility
Durability
Weight
Sustainability
Simply put, the Mammut Nirvana 28 has real drawbacks. It might serve you well for backcountry outings on which you’re not carrying much weight—a snowcat trip or a quick sojourn out of the resort gates, perhaps—and its compartment layout and durability are admirable qualities. But when packed with a full ski tour loadout, the Nirvana’s lack of support and saggy shape make it uncomfortable and awkward to ski with. It simply doesn’t offer the load transfer or adjustability needed in a ski backpack for longer missions. If you want something more versatile and supportive, consider the Ortovox Switchback 32 or the Osprey Soelden 32.
powder to the people
Gear Guide
Best Ski Helmets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Bibs of 2026Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Gloves of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Mittens of 2026Gear Guide
Best Base Layers of 2026curated for you