Design takes a back seat to price with the incredibly inexpensive Matein Carry On Backpack ($32). To its credit, this pack is light and easy to stash, which makes it a decent choice as a secondary or backup luggage option. However, it’s also uncomfortable, cheaply made, and too structureless to carry real weight well. If you travel more than occasionally and want one bag for your trips, spending more on another model is the smart move.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
Capacities
40L (27, 45L)
Fabric(s)
Polyester
Hipbelt
No
Laptop Sleeve
No
Exterior Pockets
2
Weight
2 lb. 3.2 oz.
Pros
Cons
Matein Carry-on Backpack
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Travel Backpacks.
The Matein Carry On Backpack is the least supportive travel pack I’ve tested, and it feels closer to a middle schooler’s book bag than a purpose-built piece of luggage. The backpanel has three mesh sections with minimal padding, but there’s essentially no structure behind them—I constantly felt items inside the bag poking into my back. The shoulder straps don’t contour well either, and without a hipbelt, everything sits on your shoulders while the load slumps low and swings around.
When I stuffed the pack with 25 pounds, the carry felt sloppy enough that turns had some unwanted momentum, like it was lagging behind my body. A sternum strap helps a little, but it also concentrates pressure across the chest in a way that never felt particularly comfortable. The Matein Carry-on Backpack’s four exterior compression straps can shrink the profile a little, but they don’t fix the underlying issue: This pack doesn’t stabilize weight well. To add insult to discomfort, I could feel the pack start sticking to my back within five to 10 minutes as sweat built up. (As I soldiered on, my back became soaked in less than a mile of walking.) Almost any other travel pack will provide a better carry experience, and if you want one that doesn’t break the bank, check out the REI Co-op Ruckpack 30 ($109).
The Carry On’s layout is functional, but only in the most basic sense. It has a clamshell opening that, at the very least, allows you to access the main compartment with ease. A large mesh pocket on the inside of the lid holds toiletries and other medium-sized items, while the dorsal side of the bag has a slim stash pocket and a larger pocket behind it with a few sleeves for small accessories. Those outer pockets are the best part of the system, because they’re easy to reach and keep small items from disappearing into the main compartment.
The problem is what’s missing. There’s no laptop sleeve, which turned accessing my computer into a production (at a coffee shop, I had to unzip the bag fully and fish it out of the interior mesh pocket). And there’s no water bottle pocket, so grabbing a drink also meant opening the main compartment and digging around. The Matein Carry-on does have lockable zipper loops, which is a nice touch, as well as a luggage pass-through and tuck-away straps, but overall this is a sparse setup that feels closer to “good enough” (barely) than travel-friendly.
My first impression was that this bag’s materials felt thin, plasticky, and anything but confidence-inspiring. The Carry On arrived on my doorstep with some threads already loose, and the overall construction lacks the reinforcements you’d expect on stress points. Nothing catastrophically failed during testing, but I didn’t come away believing it would hold up to repeated trips or rough handling.
If you travel a couple of times a year and treat this pack gently, it may survive for a while. But compared to the next step up—even a travel backpack like the Amazon Basics Travel Backpack—it feels flimsier and less structured. Compared to a legitimate budget performer like the REI Ruckpack, it’s not even in the same category. I’d steer clear of the Carry On unless it’s truly your only option.
Although it’s labeled as “water resistant” on its product page, I didn’t see any evidence of a durable water-repellent finish on the Matein Carry-on Backpack, and its fabric isn’t coated with TPU or PU. The material is also thin enough that I wouldn’t trust it in real precipitation. I used this pack in mild weather, but given the materials and construction, this is not a bag I’d want to rely on if the sky opens up.
At best, it’s for quick dashes to a doorway, where you’re not worried about your gear. If weather protection matters at all, a pack with a rain cover (like the Ruckpack) or a tougher build will be dramatically more reassuring.
This is where the Carry On actually makes a (slim) case for itself. At 2 pounds, 3.2 ounces, it’s one of the lightest travel backpacks in the category, and is surprisingly compact for a 40-liter bag when you want to stow it. The lack of structure is a performance problem on your back, but it does make the bag easy to flatten and store. Mine arrived folded in half, and it’s the kind of pack you can toss in a suitcase as a backup without much fuss.
Carry-on sizing is generally fine, and the pack’s flimsiness means you might get away with using it as a personal item if it isn’t fully stuffed. Either way, this is a bag you choose for packability and cost, not for comfort.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Repair Services
Repair services extend the lifespan of outdoor gear and reduce overall consumption, though programs vary widely. Some brands offer comprehensive repairs for a range of issues, while others provide limited or no repair support. A green check mark indicates a robust repair program, a yellow check mark indicates limited repair services, and a red X indicates the brand does not offer repair services.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
I tested the “XL” 40-liter version; Matein also sells the Carry On in 27- and 45-liter capacities. On my 5-foot-10, 185-pound frame, the fit felt loose and unstable—without a hipbelt and with a structureless backpanel, the pack didn’t stay tight to my back, and it tended to sway and swing as I moved. That, combined with the poor ventilation, made it a tough pack to wear for any real walking.
Even compared to other hipbelt-less packs I’ve used, the Carry On sat worse on my body and carried weight less confidently. If fit and comfort are priorities—as they should be, for most folks—the Matein underwhelms.
Amazon Basics Travel Backpack ($42): The Lesser of Two Evils
At first glance, these two bargain-bin travel packs have a lot in common. Both feature nearly identical capacities and organization, with stowable shoulder straps and expandable storage. But take a closer look, and you’ll notice several areas where the Basics Travel Backpack pulls ahead. It includes a separate laptop sleeve, uses better-quality (though still cheap) materials, and features a removable hipbelt. Plus, the Basics comes with an extra strap that lets you carry it as a shoulder bag. The one area where the Carry On stands out is packability—it weighs over 2 pounds less and folds down much more easily. At the end of the day, both of these budget picks are far from perfect, but between the two, we’d recommend spending the additional cash for the more functional Amazon Basics Travel Backpack. To learn more, check out our Amazon Travel Backpack review.
REI Co-op Ruckpack 30 Pack ($109): A Much Better Investment
It’s impossible to miss the striking price difference between these two packs. At $109, the Ruckpack 30 is over three times as expensive as the Carry On, but if you have the cash, it’s worth every penny. The Ruckpack’s 400-denier nylon shell and liner, combined with a stashable raincover, make it significantly more durable and weather-resistant. It’s also far more functional, with a laptop sleeve, water bottle holders, several extra pockets, and even attachments for trekking poles. Arguably the most important quality, though, is the Ruckpack’s vastly superior comfort. It sports a hipbelt and ribbed foam framesheet for a much more supportive and breathable carry. Simply put, this is a far more capable and comfortable travel pack. For more, read our review of the Ruckpack 30.
The Carry On’s rock-bottom price is probably its most appealing feature. There are tradeoffs aplenty, though: While we appreciate its light weight and packability (when you’re not using it), we have major qualms with almost everything else.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
The Amazon Basics Travel Backpack will get the job done for the occasional traveler who doesn’t plan on walking very far. While you’ll spend less cash on this pack than with many of its competitors, your shoulders, hips, and back will pay the price.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
A hybrid between a travel pack and a hiking pack, the Ruckpack is designed to take you seamlessly from skyscrapers to summits. Our testers praised its comfort, adaptability, and value, but a few awkward design choices prevented it from competing for a top spot.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
We’d only recommend the Matein Carry-on if your budget is truly maxed out and your carrying needs are minimal. It’s uncomfortable under real weight, omits basics like a laptop sleeve and a water bottle pocket, and doesn’t inspire confidence for durability or wet weather. Where it does make sense is as a cheap backup bag you keep folded in your luggage for the return trip—but that’s about it.
gear up and go
Gear Guide
Best Duffel Bags of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Camping Tents of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Backpacking Sleeping Bags of 2026