The Merrell Thermo Chill 2 ($150) hits a desirable mix of price, low weight, and walking comfort. It's built for moderate winters, and its low ankle height and light insulation simply won't cut it for extended time in sub-20°F temperatures. The outsole grip on slippery or steep terrain was also a bit of a letdown. But as a daily winter driver in mild environments, its balanced build has plenty of appeal.
Warmth
Walking Comfort
Traction
Waterproofing
Durability
Sustainability
Upper
PU-coated suede & mesh
Insulation
200g synthetic
Boot Height
6 in.
Weight
2 lb. 2 oz.
Waterproofing
Membrane
Pros
Cons
Merrell Thermo Chill 2
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Winter Boots.
The Thermo Chill 2 is a lightweight, hiking-inspired boot built for moderate winter climates. Based in Central Washington, that's what I typically experience: temperatures in the low 20s to low 30s, with occasional dips into the teens. For my uses—shoveling snow, sledding with the kids, hiking, and everyday wear around town—the warmth was spot-on. A heavily insulated model would be overkill in most of those situations, and the 200-gram synthetic fill, paired with midweight merino wool socks, took the sting out of sub-freezing temps without feeling excessive.
In the broader winter boot market, the Merrell Thermo Chill 2 falls on the lighter end of the insulation spectrum. It was my go-to for throwing on after skiing, walking the parking lot, and shuttling kid gear. But when I was sedentary in sub-freezing conditions, I started to feel the chill set in. The boot covers just over the ankle, and it's simply too thin and short to be viable in regions like the Midwest or Alaska that regularly see single-digit and sub-zero temperatures.
Given its low weight and relatively low height, the Thermo Chill 2 is a genuinely comfortable boot to wear all day. There's plenty of flex to the build for walking, and you never feel its presence the way you do in a stiffer, taller alternative like Oboz's Bridger 10” Insulated. The upper is still substantial, and it was slightly stiff out of the box, but it broke in quickly and proved more walkable than the vast majority of winter boots I've worn, including the North Face Chilkat V, Oboz Bridger, and Salomon Tundra Pro.
Comfort touches are well considered throughout. The tongue is heavily padded, and the collar has generous cushioning, so even with the laces cinched snugly, I never felt pressure points. A fleece interior lining adds a soft, cushioned feel and makes the boot easy to slip on—not a given in the men's winter boot category. At just over 2 pounds for the pair, it feels far more like a modern hiking boot than a traditional winter boot, and I had no issues wearing it through full winter days of sledding, mountain-town walking, and even driving a manual transmission (clutch pedal and all).
The original Thermo Chill exceeded expectations for the price with an aggressive, grippy outsole. The Thermo Chill 2, however, felt like a step back. The wavy lug pattern has grooves to theoretically increase bite, but I found performance below average and prone to slipping, even on fairly casual activities like shoveling snow. Wearing back-to-back with hiking-inspired alternatives like the Oboz Bridger Insulated and the more casual Chilkat V, the Thermo Chill 2 fell noticeably short. The lugs are shallow, and its grip on ice can’t touch anything featuring Vibram's Arctic Grip compound. For casual wear and moderate conditions, it gets by. For anything more demanding, the compromised outsole is a limitation.
The waterproof lining and multi-fabric upper shed wet snow and shallow puddles without issue, and the polyurethane-coated suede proved less prone to absorbing snow than a traditional leather model. That said, this is a short boot with inherent limitations. The collar sits just over 5 inches high—the same height as the tongue break—so you have to be mindful of puddle depth and snow height. Even trudging through fresh snow with the kids, I was mindful of the boot's limits; without gaiters or extra care, there's a real chance of getting snow over the top. For those wanting more coverage in a hiking-inspired design, the Oboz Bridger 10” Insulated is a strong alternative, though it costs nearly $100 more.
It's clear Merrell was balancing cost with performance on the Thermo Chill 2 Mid, with a real emphasis on the former. The coated upper has a slightly plasticky look and feel, and the outsole quality was a letdown. There's also a fair amount of exposed midsole foam that can pick up scrapes and nicks in rougher terrain. Does it look a little cheap next to a nicer boot like the leather Oboz Bridger or the more stylish TNF Chilkat V? Yes. But at $150 for such a comfortable and walkable winter boot, the durability is up to snuff, and the soft fleece lining is a genuine highlight. Overall, it's a functional piece that gets the job done without the bulk and clunk of heavier alternatives.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
PFAS-Free Waterproofing
The waterproofing materials used in winter boots, such as membranes and durable water-repellent finishes, can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses PFAS-free materials, while a red X means some of the materials contain PFAS.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one of the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
Lacing System
The Thermo Chill 2 uses a fairly standard lacing system with two sets of eyelets above the ankle, the upper pair being metal hooks that allow a firm, snug cinch. I occasionally needed to retighten during the day, though it was rarely a bother for casual and light backcountry use. Given its low height, the boot is easier to put on and take off than a taller model—a plus for quick trips outside—though not quite as effortless as a true slip-on.
I wear a men's size 9 across the board with average feet and a slightly narrow heel. If I were buying again, I'd go up a half size. Paired with heavyweight socks, the toe box was simply too snug, and even with midweight hiking socks it felt borderline tight. The heel fit well, and the laces adjusted fine through the midfoot, but I'd want more room in the toes to comfortably accommodate thicker winter socks.
The North Face Chilkat V ($170): More of Everything
The Chilkat V represents a step up in most ways from the Thermo Chill: it's warmer with 400-gram fill, about 4 inches taller, grippier, and tougher thanks to a substantial TPU base. All that extra adds weight—about 1 pound more per pair—and you lose some of the easy walkability of the Thermo Chill. But if your local environment justifies the bump in warmth and protection, the Chilkat V is well worth the $20 price increase. For more, read our TNF Chilkat V review.
Merrell Coldpack 3 Thermo Mid ($185): In-House Upgrade
For $35 more than the Thermo Chill, Merrell's Coldpack 3 Mid comes with a number of meaningful upgrades. First and foremost is the outsole, which features Vibram's Arctic Grip compound for serious traction in snowy and slippery conditions. A leather upper also gives it a bump in toughness and looks. Warmth-wise, the two are quite similar, with comparable heights and 200-gram synthetic insulation. If you get out frequently, especially for hiking or in icy conditions, the Cold Pack 3 Mid may be worth the price jump, though the Thermo Chill 2's value is hard to deny.
Light, flexible, and comfortable for walking and hiking, the Thermo Chill 2 is a great value for mild-winter use. Just be sure to steer clear if you need serious protection and performance: its low ankle height, thin polyester fill, and so-so grip all hold it back from being a category leader.
Warmth
Walking Comfort
Traction
Waterproofing
Durability
Sustainability
The Chilkat V 400 didn't blow us away in any one area, but it provides perfectly adequate performance for tromping around in winter. It’s also one of the more affordable boots we’ve tested, although its bulky build and generic fit won’t win a lot of admirers.
Warmth
Walking Comfort
Traction
Waterproofing
Durability
Sustainability
The Bridger 10-Inch Insulated offers a dialed blend of weather protection, walking comfort, and warmth. Neither too light nor too bulky, it should function well for most of your winter adventures, whether urban- or trail-oriented. It’s not cheap, though, and not everybody likes a cuff this high.
Warmth
Walking Comfort
Traction
Waterproofing
Durability
Sustainability
The Merrell Thermo Chill 2 is among the most affordable hiking-style winter boots on the market, and it's not especially compromised either. It's a good match for areas with mild winters—temperatures mostly in the 20s and 30s—is comfortable for all-day wear, and keeps weight and bulk low. The fit runs snug, so consider sizing up if you plan to wear thick socks, and the budget price keeps it from being a traction standout. Steer clear if you need serious warmth and protection in deep, frigid conditions. But for those in regions with mild winters like our Pacific Northwest tester, the combination of warmth, protection, low weight, and low price is a strong package.
get outside
Gear Guide
Best Men's Winter Jackets of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Women’s Winter Boots of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Women's Winter Jackets of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Mittens of 2026-2027