The waterproof NRS Expedition DriDuffel 70L ($350) is unique among the duffel bags we’ve tested so far. This spartan model is basically a giant dry bag with a shoulder strap. Yes, it’s fully submersible, reasonably comfortable to haul, and has a toothless zipper that’s smoother to operate than other IPX7-rated duffels. But the DriDuffel’s no-frills design has zero pockets, and it feels slightly cheap for the hefty price.
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Carrying Comfort
Weight & Packability
Sustainability
Capacities
12, 35, 70, 105L
Carry Straps
Shoulder
Weight
2 lb. 12.8 oz.
Fabric(s)
840D nylon
Waterproof
Yes
Pros
Cons
NRS Expedition DriDuffel 70L
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Duffel Bags.
The NSR Expedition DriDuffel 70L has a very simple construction, which negatively impacts its organizational layout. It has no internal or external pockets, storage sleeves, or dividers—just a single, cavernous space. On one hand, the design made packing big, rigid items easy. The bag’s flexible fabric and wide mouth meant I could stuff a loaded daypack inside without issue—something I couldn’t do with the Yeti Panga (a waterproof duffel competitor). But smaller items like keys, chargers, and a headlamp had nowhere to go unless I stashed them in shoes or pre-packed them in cubes. That got annoying quickly.
There are a few redeeming details to this spartan bag, though. The zipper—NRS’s “TruZip” system—is the easiest-to-operate waterproof closure I’ve used. It’s like a zip-top freezer bag glide, with small pull tabs on either end to help seal it. The result is you have to expend much less effort than opening and closing the beefy zippers on the Panga and the Osprey Transporter Waterproof. The Expedition also has daisy chains and lash tabs along the sides for strapping the bag to a boat or clipping on extra gear. Two external compression straps can help slim the bag down. But for $330, I expected at least a basic pocket or a key clip inside. As is, the NRS Expedition DriDuffel feels more like an oversized dry bag than a thoughtfully designed duffel.
Despite being built with 840-denier, TPU-coated nylon, the Expedition didn’t feel as tough as I expected. In testing, the fabric held up through river dunkings, dirt, and car-to-campsite work without any rips or tears. But it felt thinner and less rugged than the materials on the Panga or even the non-waterproof Patagonia Black Hole, both of which feature thicker fabric and hardier TPU. The Expedition’s hardware, especially its plastic clips, also felt cheaper than what’s used on competitors like the Osprey Transporter.
This bag lacks a reinforced base and corner reinforcements, which further limit its long-term abrasion resistance. While I was pleased that the waterproofing worked (and that the welded seams do inspire confidence), I wouldn’t take the Expedition into harsh terrain or expect it to survive years of heavy use, which is disappointing, given NRS’s river running legacy and the bag’s moniker. The Expedition may outlast your normal dry bags, but compared to other waterproof duffel bags, it’s a tier below in build quality.
Color me unsurprised: This category is the NRS Expedition DriDuffel’s best trait. Like the Panga and the Transporter, it’s IPX7-rated, meaning it can survive 30 minutes submerged in three feet of water. I tested this claim directly by tossing the bag in the Tuolumne River and holding it under; everything inside stayed completely dry. As I mentioned earlier, the TruZip closure is especially impressive. It’s no less waterproof than toothier zippers, but it’s much easier to use—which might help prevent you from failing to close it completely, and thus let water in.
The Expedition’s materials are also UV-resistant, which is a nice bonus for sun-exposed paddling or beach trips. That said, this duffel doesn’t feel quite as bombproof or secure as it should. It definitely works for keeping your gear dry, but the rest of the package feels a little underbuilt. That’s why I’m docking it half a point in this category compared to its closest competitors. For basic water travel, it’s more than enough—but if your gear absolutely can’t get wet, the Panga or the Transporter still feels like the safer bets.
For a bag that has such a simple design—just one shoulder strap and carry handles—the NRS Expedition DriDuffel 70L is surprisingly pleasant to carry. On trips through Yosemite and in the Santa Monica Mountains, I toggled between using the shoulder strap and the handles depending on walking distance. The padded carry handles stood out as one of the best I’ve used on any duffel, whether waterproof or not: They’re thick, fit into your hand nicely, and structured enough to stay comfortable even under a 30-pound load. When clasped together, they didn’t dig into my hand like the carry handles on the Thule Chasm or the REI Co-op Big Haul. Neither of the Expedition’s two main competitors, the Osprey Transporter Waterproof and the Yeti Panga, has dedicated hand carry handles.
The shoulder strap also performed reasonably well. It has an adjustable padded section, and it never chafed or caused fatigue while letting me carry the Expedition while wearing a backpack. Having said that, I wouldn’t want to use the over-the-shoulder method with heavy loads. Compared to the Transporter or Panga, which both have backpack straps, the Expedition is less well-suited for schlepping a hefty amount of weight over moderate distances. If you’re just moving the bag from your camp to the canoe or from your car to the hotel room, though, the Expedition has those two models beat.
Weighing in at 2 pounds, 12.8 ounces, the Expedition is relatively lightweight for a 70-liter waterproof duffel. (The Osprey Transporter Waterproof is a couple of ounces lighter, but the super-beefy Yeti Panga is more than double the weight.) Its fabric is soft and unstructured, so it folds and compresses easily—even though it doesn’t come with a dedicated storage pouch. I had no trouble stuffing it into another duffel or compressing it to make it more packable. It won’t collapse quite as small as other duffel bags, like the REI Co-op Roadtripper or the Black Hole, but for a waterproof bag, it’s refreshingly low-bulk.
That said, the Expedition’s lack of internal structure can make it feel floppy when partially packed. And while the weight is decent, I’d have gladly traded a few extra ounces for more reinforcements or an internal pocket. It hits a good balance for paddling trips or situations where packability and waterproofing both matter, but it’s not the best in class on either metric.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
PFAS-Free Materials
This product's waterproofing is made without per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These synthetic compounds are known as "forever chemicals” because they take an extremely long time to degrade, if at all. PFAS can eventually end up in everything from soil to drinking water and have been linked to a range of health issues.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Repair Services
Repair services extend the lifespan of outdoor gear and reduce overall consumption, though programs vary widely. Some brands offer comprehensive repairs for a range of issues, while others provide limited or no repair support. A green check mark indicates a robust repair program, a yellow check mark indicates limited repair services, and a red X indicates the brand does not offer repair services.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
Yeti Panga 75L Waterproof Duffel ($350): More Durable, Harder to Pack
While the Expedition can come across as flimsy and underbuilt, the Panga has the opposite problem. Its construction is supremely hearty and durable—so much so that its stiffness can make packing a chore. Thankfully, at least you won’t be hunting for a spot to stash your phone or wallet, as the Panga has two internal mesh pockets. It also comes with backpack straps, but it lacks the Expedition’s smartly designed top handles and external compression straps. Both bags carry an IPX7 rating to keep your gear dry if they get knocked off the boat, and each will cost you a pretty penny. It will help to weigh durability against ease of use when deciding which one fits your needs. To learn more, check out our Panga Waterproof Duffel review.
Osprey Transporter Waterproof Duffel 70 ($360): Handle Those Heavy Loads
If you expect extended portages on your next river trip, the Transporter may be the duffel you’re looking for. It features well-designed backpack straps that make hauling heavy gear a mostly smooth experience, especially compared to what you get with the Expedition’s single shoulder strap. When it comes to hand-carrying, though, the Expedition comes out on top thanks to its dedicated handles and well-padded grip. Both boast an IPX7 rating, but the Expedition is built with a shell that’s much thicker. In practice, however, the Transporter’s double TPU coating and more tear-resistant ripstop weave help it feel stronger, and its toothed zipper seems less likely to come apart. It also comes with a small pocket, plus handy internal compression straps. Unless you really like the Expedition’s dedicated carry handles or the $30 price bump is a deal-breaker, the Transporter delivers better organization and more capable long-haul transport. For more, read our review of the Transporter Waterproof Duffel.
The Expedition DriDuffel is for river rats and watersport enthusiasts who like a simple, bare-bones approach to keeping their things dry. Its minimalist build is easy to open and offers plenty of space for your gear, but it falls short of the build quality and organizational perks of other waterproof duffels.
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Carrying Comfort
Weight & Packability
Sustainability
The Panga’s calling card is its completely waterproof design, but another major benefit is its rock-solid durability. This is a duffel for rafting down the Grand Canyon, although its carrying comfort leaves much to be desired, especially at this price.
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Carrying Comfort
Weight & Packability
Sustainability
If you’re heading out on a river trip or into a notoriously wet climate, the Transporter Waterproof will keep your gear dry in even the soggiest conditions. However, it’s more difficult to use than traditional duffels, and its steep price makes it a tough sell for anyone who doesn’t need full waterproofing.
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Carrying Comfort
Weight & Packability
Sustainability
If you need a completely waterproof bag that’s easier to use than the Yeti Panga and more affordable than the Osprey Transporter, the NRS Expedition DriDuffel 70L might hit your sweet spot. It’s simple, light, and gets the waterproofing job done. You’ll just have to accept that its carry isn’t as comfortable as backpack-style models, it lacks internal organization, and that it feels slightly underbuilt for its $330 price tag. For river trips or wet conditions where pockets and polish don’t matter, it’s a solid tool. But if you want a more versatile waterproof hauler, there are better options.
gear up and go
Gear Guide
Best Camping Tents of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Backpacking Sleeping Bags of 2026