Get Better Trail in your inbox.

Subscribe here.
MENU

NRS Expedition DriDuffel Review

Andrew Shults bio photo
By Andrew James Shults
Dec 11, 2025
When you buy through our links, we may receive a commission.
Our Take:
4.2/5

The waterproof NRS Expedition DriDuffel 70L ($350) is unique among the duffel bags we’ve tested so far. This spartan model is basically a giant dry bag with a shoulder strap. Yes, it’s fully submersible, reasonably comfortable to haul, and has a toothless zipper that’s smoother to operate than other IPX7-rated duffels. But the DriDuffel’s no-frills design has zero pockets, and it feels slightly cheap for the hefty price.

Organization

Organization

2/5
Durability

Durability

3.5/5
Water Resistance

Water Resistance

4.5/5
Carrying Comfort

Carrying Comfort

3.5/5
Weight & Packability

Weight & Packability

3/5
Sustainability

Sustainability

3.2/5

Capacities

12, 35, 70, 105L

Carry Straps

Shoulder

Weight

2 lb. 12.8 oz.

Fabric(s)

840D nylon

Waterproof

Yes

Pros

With its IPX7 rating, it shrugs off splashes and even full dips in the water.
Well-padded grip keeps its shape and doesn’t bend easily.
Smooth zipper is easier to use than the toothed versions on other waterproof duffels.

Cons

No pockets or additional dividers in the main compartment.
Single shoulder strap is less convenient than backpack straps.
Feels thinner and less burly than the other waterproof duffels we’ve tested.

For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Duffel Bags.

The NSR Expedition DriDuffel 70L has a very simple construction, which negatively impacts its organizational layout. It has no internal or external pockets, storage sleeves, or dividers—just a single, cavernous space. On one hand, the design made packing big, rigid items easy. The bag’s flexible fabric and wide mouth meant I could stuff a loaded daypack inside without issue—something I couldn’t do with the Yeti Panga (a waterproof duffel competitor). But smaller items like keys, chargers, and a headlamp had nowhere to go unless I stashed them in shoes or pre-packed them in cubes. That got annoying quickly.


There are a few redeeming details to this spartan bag, though. The zipper—NRS’s “TruZip” system—is the easiest-to-operate waterproof closure I’ve used. It’s like a zip-top freezer bag glide, with small pull tabs on either end to help seal it. The result is you have to expend much less effort than opening and closing the beefy zippers on the Panga and the Osprey Transporter Waterproof. The Expedition also has daisy chains and lash tabs along the sides for strapping the bag to a boat or clipping on extra gear. Two external compression straps can help slim the bag down. But for $330, I expected at least a basic pocket or a key clip inside. As is, the NRS Expedition DriDuffel feels more like an oversized dry bag than a thoughtfully designed duffel.

Despite being built with 840-denier, TPU-coated nylon, the Expedition didn’t feel as tough as I expected. In testing, the fabric held up through river dunkings, dirt, and car-to-campsite work without any rips or tears. But it felt thinner and less rugged than the materials on the Panga or even the non-waterproof Patagonia Black Hole, both of which feature thicker fabric and hardier TPU. The Expedition’s hardware, especially its plastic clips, also felt cheaper than what’s used on competitors like the Osprey Transporter.


This bag lacks a reinforced base and corner reinforcements, which further limit its long-term abrasion resistance. While I was pleased that the waterproofing worked (and that the welded seams do inspire confidence), I wouldn’t take the Expedition into harsh terrain or expect it to survive years of heavy use, which is disappointing, given NRS’s river running legacy and the bag’s moniker. The Expedition may outlast your normal dry bags, but compared to other waterproof duffel bags, it’s a tier below in build quality.

Color me unsurprised: This category is the NRS Expedition DriDuffel’s best trait. Like the Panga and the Transporter, it’s IPX7-rated, meaning it can survive 30 minutes submerged in three feet of water. I tested this claim directly by tossing the bag in the Tuolumne River and holding it under; everything inside stayed completely dry. As I mentioned earlier, the TruZip closure is especially impressive. It’s no less waterproof than toothier zippers, but it’s much easier to use—which might help prevent you from failing to close it completely, and thus let water in.


The Expedition’s materials are also UV-resistant, which is a nice bonus for sun-exposed paddling or beach trips. That said, this duffel doesn’t feel quite as bombproof or secure as it should. It definitely works for keeping your gear dry, but the rest of the package feels a little underbuilt. That’s why I’m docking it half a point in this category compared to its closest competitors. For basic water travel, it’s more than enough—but if your gear absolutely can’t get wet, the Panga or the Transporter still feels like the safer bets.

For a bag that has such a simple design—just one shoulder strap and carry handles—the NRS Expedition DriDuffel 70L is surprisingly pleasant to carry. On trips through Yosemite and in the Santa Monica Mountains, I toggled between using the shoulder strap and the handles depending on walking distance. The padded carry handles stood out as one of the best I’ve used on any duffel, whether waterproof or not: They’re thick, fit into your hand nicely, and structured enough to stay comfortable even under a 30-pound load. When clasped together, they didn’t dig into my hand like the carry handles on the Thule Chasm or the REI Co-op Big Haul. Neither of the Expedition’s two main competitors, the Osprey Transporter Waterproof and the Yeti Panga, has dedicated hand carry handles.


The shoulder strap also performed reasonably well. It has an adjustable padded section, and it never chafed or caused fatigue while letting me carry the Expedition while wearing a backpack. Having said that, I wouldn’t want to use the over-the-shoulder method with heavy loads. Compared to the Transporter or Panga, which both have backpack straps, the Expedition is less well-suited for schlepping a hefty amount of weight over moderate distances. If you’re just moving the bag from your camp to the canoe or from your car to the hotel room, though, the Expedition has those two models beat.

Weighing in at 2 pounds, 12.8 ounces, the Expedition is relatively lightweight for a 70-liter waterproof duffel. (The Osprey Transporter Waterproof is a couple of ounces lighter, but the super-beefy Yeti Panga is more than double the weight.) Its fabric is soft and unstructured, so it folds and compresses easily—even though it doesn’t come with a dedicated storage pouch. I had no trouble stuffing it into another duffel or compressing it to make it more packable. It won’t collapse quite as small as other duffel bags, like the REI Co-op Roadtripper or the Black Hole, but for a waterproof bag, it’s refreshingly low-bulk.


That said, the Expedition’s lack of internal structure can make it feel floppy when partially packed. And while the weight is decent, I’d have gladly traded a few extra ounces for more reinforcements or an internal pocket. It hits a good balance for paddling trips or situations where packability and waterproofing both matter, but it’s not the best in class on either metric.

Select icon to view details:

Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon

Longevity

Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.

Yeti Panga 75L Waterproof Duffel ($350): More Durable, Harder to Pack
While the Expedition can come across as flimsy and underbuilt, the Panga has the opposite problem. Its construction is supremely hearty and durable—so much so that its stiffness can make packing a chore. Thankfully, at least you won’t be hunting for a spot to stash your phone or wallet, as the Panga has two internal mesh pockets. It also comes with backpack straps, but it lacks the Expedition’s smartly designed top handles and external compression straps. Both bags carry an IPX7 rating to keep your gear dry if they get knocked off the boat, and each will cost you a pretty penny. It will help to weigh durability against ease of use when deciding which one fits your needs. To learn more, check out our Panga Waterproof Duffel review.


Osprey Transporter Waterproof Duffel 70 ($360): Handle Those Heavy Loads
If you expect extended portages on your next river trip, the Transporter may be the duffel you’re looking for. It features well-designed backpack straps that make hauling heavy gear a mostly smooth experience, especially compared to what you get with the Expedition’s single shoulder strap. When it comes to hand-carrying, though, the Expedition comes out on top thanks to its dedicated handles and well-padded grip. Both boast an IPX7 rating, but the Expedition is built with a shell that’s much thicker. In practice, however, the Transporter’s double TPU coating and more tear-resistant ripstop weave help it feel stronger, and its toothed zipper seems less likely to come apart. It also comes with a small pocket, plus handy internal compression straps. Unless you really like the Expedition’s dedicated carry handles or the $30 price bump is a deal-breaker, the Transporter delivers better organization and more capable long-haul transport. For more, read our review of the Transporter Waterproof Duffel.

NRS Expedition DriDuffel 70L ($350)
Standing with NRS Expedition DriDuffel Dry Bag on shoulder
4.2/5

The Expedition DriDuffel is for river rats and watersport enthusiasts who like a simple, bare-bones approach to keeping their things dry. Its minimalist build is easy to open and offers plenty of space for your gear, but it falls short of the build quality and organizational perks of other waterproof duffels.

Capacities
12, 35, 70, 105L
Carry Straps
Shoulder
Weight
2 lb. 12.8 oz.
Fabric(s)
840D nylon
Waterproof
Yes
Icon

Organization

2/5
Icon

Durability

3.5/5
Icon

Water Resistance

4.5/5
Icon

Carrying Comfort

3.5/5
Icon

Weight & Packability

3/5
Icon

Sustainability

3.2/5
Yeti Panga 50L ($325)
Yeti Panga 50L Waterproof Duffel Bag logo
4.3/5

The Panga’s calling card is its completely waterproof design, but another major benefit is its rock-solid durability. This is a duffel for rafting down the Grand Canyon, although its carrying comfort leaves much to be desired, especially at this price.

Capacities
50, 75, 100L
Carry Straps
Backpack
Weight
5 lb. 3.2 oz.
Fabric(s)
High-density nylon with TPU laminate
Waterproof
Yes
Icon

Organization

2/5
Icon

Durability

5/5
Icon

Water Resistance

5/5
Icon

Carrying Comfort

2.5/5
Icon

Weight & Packability

1/5
Icon

Sustainability

2.1/5
Osprey Transporter Waterproof 70 ($360)
Holding Osprey Transporter Waterproof Duffel 70
4.4/5

If you’re heading out on a river trip or into a notoriously wet climate, the Transporter Waterproof will keep your gear dry in even the soggiest conditions. However, it’s more difficult to use than traditional duffels, and its steep price makes it a tough sell for anyone who doesn’t need full waterproofing.

Capacities
40, 70, 100L
Carry Straps
Backpack
Weight
2 lb. 7.6 oz.
Fabric(s)
TPU-coated 630D nylon
Waterproof
Yes
Icon

Organization

2.5/5
Icon

Durability

4/5
Icon

Water Resistance

5/5
Icon

Carrying Comfort

3/5
Icon

Weight & Packability

3.5/5
Icon

Sustainability

4.4/5

Is the Expedition DriDuffel for You?

If you need a completely waterproof bag that’s easier to use than the Yeti Panga and more affordable than the Osprey Transporter, the NRS Expedition DriDuffel 70L might hit your sweet spot. It’s simple, light, and gets the waterproofing job done. You’ll just have to accept that its carry isn’t as comfortable as backpack-style models, it lacks internal organization, and that it feels slightly underbuilt for its $330 price tag. For river trips or wet conditions where pockets and polish don’t matter, it’s a solid tool. But if you want a more versatile waterproof hauler, there are better options.