Updated:
Sep 09, 2025Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
Best for
Backcountry
Waterproofing
3-layer H2No
Insulation
Uninsulated
Fabric
40D stretch nylon
Pros
Cons
Patagonia Stormstride
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Ski Pants.
The Patagonia Stormstride Pants mimic the Stormstride jacket when it comes to weather protection, featuring brand's consistently reliable 3-layer H2No Performance Standard fabric and fully taped seams. For me, they strike the perfect balance between having a lightweight, touring-friendly construction while still offering enough protection from the elements. I wore these pants for some evening laps on a classic Northwest day at Snoqualmie Pass: A mix of rain and snow with temperatures around 36 degrees Fahrenheit, and no wind. The fabric of these pants feels so light and thin that I wasn’t sure how well it would handle the wet conditions, but the water beads off these pants effectively with its DWR coating and the hard-face nylon material. The Stormstride’s waterproofing even outperformed less touring-specific pants I’ve used, like the Flylow Moxie Bibs, which ended up soaking through in sustained rain and wetter snow.
That said, the Patagonia Stormstride Pants are more breathable than bombproof. In other words, they’re prone to feeling drafty in particularly cold temps and simply don’t block the wind as effectively as a thicker ski pant design like my Trew Chariot Bib. This makes them far less appealing for consistent resort use, but considering the pants are intended for ski touring, this doesn’t feel like a major compromise.
Despite their thinner construction, I’ve been warm enough wearing these pants on most of my ski days in Washington so far. In line with these pants’ touring-focused design, the majority of those days have been in the backcountry where I like to keep moving at a good pace, naturally keeping my body warm. Though I was also comfortable wearing them on warmer resort days (temperatures in the mid-30s Fahrenheit with no wind and partial sun), I got cold in a hurry when I wore them night skiing when temperatures were in the 20s Fahrenheit. Overall, the pants offer the right amount of warmth for the backcountry or spring days at the resort, but if you’re riding a lot of chairlifts when it’s cold and windy, you’ll be happier with thicker ski pants like the Patagonia Storm Shift, which feature a thicker construction and a hanging liner that boosts warmth.
The Stormstride pant tops the charts in the comfort department, with an easy-to-pull-on design and a flexible, forgiving fabric. The interior is also surprisingly soft and less crinkly/noisy compared to Gore-Tex pants like The North Face Summit Series Verbier bibs. Adding to the comfort factor, the leg vents are on the outside of the thighs rather than on the inside (where they often scrape against each other while I’m skinning). The waistband is another common area of irritation with ski pants, but the Stormstride pants feature a stretchy velcro adjustment on the inside of the waistband, making it easy to customize the fit. I usually tuck my base layer shirt into my pants so I didn’t have any issue with the velcro rubbing against my skin.
Overall, the Patagonia Stormstride Pant is most at home in the backcountry, where a lightweight build has a positive impact on comfort. They don’t weigh me down and allow me to move quickly and efficiently.
Breathability is one of the Stormstride pant’s standout features, with Patagonia’s H2No fabric keeping me dry on the outside if it’s snowing or raining while letting heat and sweat escape when I’m working hard on the uphill. Like its companion Patagonia Stormstride Jacket, this breathability makes the pants perfect for backcountry skiing or in-bounds hiking missions where temperature regulation is more important than fortress-like weather protection.
While other shell pants I’ve worn tend to feel a bit stiffer and stuffier, especially during high-output activities, the Stormstride’s thin, stretchy fabric and two 14″ zippered thigh vents— one on the outside of each thigh—boost breathability and allow me to release excess heat when I’m starting to get warm on the uptrack. I found these pants comparable in breathability to La Sportiva’s non-waterproof Chaser Evo bibs, which are also designed specifically for “high-output” adventures, but notably, don’t offer the same level of weather protection. Overall, if you prioritize staying cool and comfortable during intense activity, the Stormstride pants are hard to beat.
I’ve tested the Stormstride pants for eight ski days this season (and counting), putting them through everything from rainy afternoon laps at Summit Central, to clear, sunny morning tours at Hyak, and even a night tour in freezing fog. Despite their lightweight construction, they’ve impressed me with how well they’ve held up (already exceeding the longevity of my lightweight La Sportiva Chaser Evo bibs). I haven’t noticed any signs of wear and tear—no fraying seams or thinning fabric—and the zippers operate flawlessly.
That said, the pant’s 40-denier (D) nylon fabric is undeniably on the thin end of the spectrum in the ski pant market. For reference, my resort-oriented Storm Shift pants are substantially thicker at 150D, while Outdoor Research’s popular backcountry bib, the Cloudchaser 3L, is a little more substantial at 100D. As a backcountry-oriented design, this is a tradeoff I’m willing to make, but the Stormstride requires more care than a burlier alternative.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Repair Services
Repair services extend the lifespan of outdoor gear and reduce overall consumption, though programs vary widely. Some brands offer comprehensive repairs for a range of issues, while others provide limited or no repair support. A green check mark indicates a robust repair program, a yellow check mark indicates limited repair services, and a red X indicates the brand does not offer repair services.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
Pockets
Given how minimal these pants are, it’s not surprising they have only two thigh pockets. That said, Patagonia did not skimp on their size—they’re both large enough to hold a phone or wallet and plenty of snacks. The right pocket can fit an avalanche transceiver and has a small loop for connecting a beacon tether. Additional pockets would be nice for the days I’m skiing in-bounds without a ski backpack and want to fit more items in my pockets like my GoPro Max camera. But, since I’m using these pants 95% of the time in the backcountry, I can put those things in my pack.
Waist Adjustment Belt
With ski pants, it can be tough to nail the fit, since unlike bibs, they’ll fall down if the waistband is too loose; too tight, on the other hand, and the pants will feel constricting and uncomfortable. To mitigate this issue, the Stormstride pants have stretchy elastic bands that velcro on the inside of the pants. Depending on how thick my base layer is I can adjust the waist with more than enough strap needed to properly tighten it. To further dial in the fit around the waist, you could also add suspenders or for those who like wearing a belt with their ski pants, there are belt loops on the outside of the waistband.
Tester: 5’6” 140 lb.; 32" waist; 27" inseam
Size tested: Women’s medium
Patagonia describes the Stormstride pants as “slim-fit,” though I’d call them “active-fit,” as I found they land in between a trim fit and a baggier, slopestyle fit. I’m typically a women’s size small, but I usually like to size up in ski outerwear to accommodate extra layers. I went with a women’s medium for these pants, which ended up being spot-on.
For additional context, I usually wear a size 27 in regular pants and wearing a thin base layer underneath the Patagonia Stormstride Pants, I had enough room in the hips, butt, and thighs to not feel constricted. With my alpine ski boots on, the pant legs end just a couple of inches above the ground. Like the Stormstride jacket, I’d recommend sizing up in these pants if you’re on the fence—especially if you plan on using them at the resort or often tour in cold weather.
Black Diamond Recon Stretch ($449): Stretch it Out
The Black Diamond Recon Stretch is another popular backcountry pant that strikes a great balance of mobility, breathability, and weather protection. Whereas the Stormstride gets its give from a stretch weave, the Recon uses a nylon (85%) and elastane (15%) blend for an even more flexible feel. Like the Stormstride, it features a stretchy 3-layer build, generous outer-thigh vents, and a pared-down feature set that covers the essentials without unnecessary extras. Fans of the freeride look will also appreciate the Recon’s large, three-dimensional thigh pockets, one of which includes a beacon tether. The Stormstride is lighter and remains our top choice for dedicated backcountry skiers, but for those who want a bit more stretch or a looser, freeride-inspired style, the Recon Stretch is a fun alternative. For more, read our Black Diamond Recon Stretch review.
Arc’teryx Sentinel ($600): Backcountry/Resort Crossover Standout
The Patagonia Stormstride excels as a backcountry-focused pant, but folks looking for resort protection and durability will need to either pick up a second pair of pants or look for a do-it-all model like the women's Arc’teryx Sentinel (men’s Sabre). The Sentinel is made for mixed resort and backcountry skiing and sports a 3-layer Gore-Tex build and thicker 80-denier (D) face fabric (compared with the Stormstride’s 40D), giving it a bomber feel on nasty-weather days. In addition, the Sentinel's interior has a more substantial backer that boosts comfort and gives it slightly more insulation (but the fabric is far stiffer than the stretchy Stormstride). For touring, you’ll heat up faster in the Sentinel (it does have large outer thigh zips to help regulate comfort), and it’s less packable, too. But as a single-pant solution, the premium Sentinel is hard to beat. For a deeper dive, read our review of the men's Sabre.
The Stormstride pant is tuned for the backcountry with a stretchy, light, and breathable construction. Its thin build exceeds expectations in wet conditions, but it's too drafty and delicate to rely on for heavy resort use.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
Appealing to the backcountry crowd, these pants are noticeably lightweight and flexible and have several touring-oriented features, including a low-profile waist belt and a dedicated avy-beacon pocket. But the build quality is a slight step down from premium brands.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
In true Arc’teryx fashion, these pants exude quality from hip to toe. The premium 3-layer Gore-Tex construction offers breathable waterproof protection for everything from storm days at the resort to high-octane skin track sessions. But buyer beware: the fit doesn’t work for everyone.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
Yes, the Patagonia Stormstride is on the spendy end at $449 for a product that can’t pull double duty all season long at the resort. But we keep coming back to this point: The design is extremely practical for nearly all backcountry conditions, deftly blending breathability, flexibility, and weather protection. If you’re spending most of your ski days in the backcountry and prefer a standard ski pant design, the Stormstride should be at the top of your list.
pray for snow
Gear Guide
Best Ski Bibs of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Helmets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Backpacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Gloves of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Mittens of 2026Gear Guide
Best Base Layers of 2026Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026curated for you