The Salomon Genesis 2 ($150) is a medium-fit, practical trainer that prioritizes toughness, stability, and a functional mix of cushioning and precision—all at a lower-than-average price. It took a little while for the shoe to loosen up, but once it did, we really liked the low-slung, confidence-inspiring feel on rocky terrain. Its mid-grade EVA cushioning has some limitations in long-distance comfort, but with over 150 miles on our pair, the Genesis 2 has proven to be a solid all-rounder.
Cushioning
Responsiveness
Stability
Traction
Durability
Sustainability
Best for
All-around
Weight
1 lb. 4 oz.
Stack height
34/26mm
Upper
Matryx (woven polyamide & Kevlar)
Midsole
EVA
Outsole
Contagrip (4mm)
Pros
Cons
Salomon Genesis 2
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Trail Running Shoes.
The Genesis 2 is a down-the-middle kind of shoe, which I largely appreciated. With a stack height of 34 millimeters at the heel and an 8-millimeter drop, it's neither plush nor spartan, and its medium-width base is a refreshing departure from the tall, squishy max-cushioned models currently in vogue. The Genesis isn't built for ultras, but should have broad appeal for the average trail runner.
I put the Genesis 2 into my rotation immediately as a daily driver, getting out on everything from local loops to full-day mountain runs. It never had me completely in love, but it also never felt out of place. On rough, rocky trail and sections of pavement used to access local networks, the cushioning was sufficiently isolating up to a point: the 26-millimeter stack under the ball of the foot and the absence of a rock plate can lead to some fatigue over high miles, particularly on sharp terrain. That said, it excelled on a 22-mile, 3,500-foot effort in Idaho's Sawtooth Mountains, where the cushioning held up well and the shoe's relatively low-slung design felt precise and confidence-inspiring throughout. For anything longer, I'd turn to my more cushioned Nike ACG Zegama Trail or the upgraded S/Lab Genesis 2, but the standard Salomon Genesis 2 checks a lot of boxes for short to medium distances.
One important note: the Genesis 2 needs some breaking in. My initial impressions had me worried it leaned too far into hiking shoe territory, with a rigid upper and chunky heel. Around the 10 to 15 mile mark it softened noticeably, settling into a comfortable, flexible feel for the remainder of my test. If your first few runs leave you skeptical, give it time.
Sporting a budget-friendly price and Salomon's standard Optifoam EVA midsole—unlike the super-foam Optifoam2 found on the pricier S/Lab version—I came in with fairly low expectations. And while it's not a propulsive super shoe by any measure, its moderate thickness and medium-firm compound deliver more life than I anticipated. A fair amount of rocker in the shoe's profile, combined with small cutouts in the rubber outsole under the midfoot, gives it sufficient flex and a natural stride.
Coming from the Brooks Cascadia 19, which I found a little plodding due to its wide base and rock plate, the Genesis 2 felt comparatively sporty. It was noticeably nimbler, lighter-feeling, and more enjoyable to run in. That said, this is a trail running shoe designed to be steady and reliable, not fast. It doesn't encourage you to hammer splits, but it moves along comfortably at normal training paces. Runners with serious speed goals will want to look at higher-energy foams or a plated midsole (and be ready to spend up for the privilege).
I have a long-standing affinity for stable, precise shoes—Topo's MTN Racers have been a favorite for years—and the Genesis 2 largely holds its own in that company. Despite being a touch taller and softer underfoot than the Topos, it impressed me with how confidence-inspiring it felt across nearly all terrain. The rocky trails of Idaho's Sawtooth Mountains were a genuine test, as were rough trails I took it into in Washington State’s Alpine Lakes Wilderness. Through it all, I had zero complaints with ankle rolls or instability, even over sections of talus and loose dirt and rock.
For design, a nearly full rubber outsole and a triangle-shaped external stiffener (Salomon calls this its ActiveChassis) provided plenty of stiffness and support. The base isn't excessively wide like the Brooks Cascadia's, which I found made foot placement feel quicker and more precise, especially moving rapidly on unpredictable ground. What initially struck me as a stiff, hiking shoe-like personality broke in to become one of the shoe's biggest strengths.
Salomon keeps their outsole design in-house, and the Genesis 2 uses their Contagrip All Terrain compound, which leans toward the firm and durable end of the spectrum. The lug pattern mixes chevrons and block-like studs that are nicely spaced and proved effective across hardpack dirt, mud, and even some fourth-class scrambling. The 4-millimeter depth provides plenty of bite under the toes on steep climbs and at the heel for braking on descents.
The one area where it shows its price point is on rock, where the tackiness of a premium Vibram Megagrip compound is noticeably absent. For a daily training shoe that extends into 20-mile mountain adventures, though, the Contagrip setup is a suitable and cost-effective solution.
Most trail running shoes lean light and airy with their uppers, but the Genesis 2 bucks that trend. Its Matryx upper—a high-tenacity woven material blending tough synthetic yarns with Kevlar—delivers an impressive durability-to-weight ratio. A generous toe cap withstood repeated direct hits to rock, and reinforcement around the midfoot, tongue, and heel adds further confidence.
Over 150 miles into the test, the shoe is holding up exceptionally well. The Contagrip outsole shows minimal wear, and the upper is dirty but otherwise looks close to new. My expectation is that the standard EVA midsole will be the first piece to go, packing out before the outsole or upper are anywhere near done. For the price, the Genesis 2 is a remarkably hardwearing shoe. As such, I can see it making sense for folks who want a single shoe for both running and hiking.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one of the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
My men's size 9 weighed in at 1 pound 5.1 ounces on my scale (the listed weight is 1 lb. 4 oz.), which is roughly average for the market. It undercuts my Nike ACG Zegama Trail (1 lb. 7.8 oz.) and Brooks Cascadia 19 (1 lb. 5.4 oz.), though it can't touch the leading edge of the market where high-performance plated options save multiple ounces while adding propulsion. In practice, weight was a non-factor. The Genesis 2 felt plenty sporty and nimble for training runs, and it's clear Salomon prioritized a tough upper and mostly full rubber outsole for longevity over shaving grams.
My men's size 9 weighed in at 1 pound 5.1 ounces on my scale (the listed weight is 1 lb. 4 oz.), which is roughly average for the market. It undercuts my Nike ACG Zegama Trail (1 lb. 7.8 oz.) and Brooks Cascadia 19 (1 lb. 5.4 oz.), though it can't touch the leading edge of the market where high-performance plated options save multiple ounces while adding propulsion. In practice, weight was a non-factor. The Genesis 2 felt plenty sporty and nimble for training runs, and it's clear Salomon prioritized a tough upper and mostly full rubber outsole for longevity over shaving grams.
I went with my standard men's size 9, and initial impressions were mixed. The first run felt snug in the toes and decidedly low-volume, not unlike some Salomon hiking shoes I've worn. As the upper loosened up, though, my impression improved significantly. The fit settled into what I'd describe as average, with a toe box that's comfortable but not wide, excellent heel lock, and solid midfoot comfort thanks to the sock-like lining, cushioned tongue and heel, and Quicklace system.
On the Quicklaces: it’s a love-it-or-hate-it feature. They're unquestionably faster for lacing up and making on-the-fly adjustments, and the quick exit was genuinely appreciated mid- and post-run when hopping in a lake. And the laces tuck neatly into a pocket in the cushioned tongue and stay in place. The tradeoff is less fit customization than a traditional lacing system, and the laces didn't slide smoothly through all the eyelets on my pair, requiring occasional manual adjustment along the cord. A minor gripe, but worth noting.
Topo MTN Racer 4 ($155): The Technical Standout
I didn't expect these two to be as comparable as they turned out to be, but the Genesis 2 and MTN Racer share a lot of common ground. Both prioritize precision and stability at a reasonable price, and both reward runners who want to feel connected to the trail. The MTN Racer sits even closer to the ground, its lacing system delivers exceptional midfoot hold, and its wider toe box is welcome on bigger days. The Genesis 2, though, is more well-rounded and forgiving as a daily trainer. As much as I love the MTN Racer for technical use, the Genesis gets the edge from me as a single-shoe solution for most runners. For a deeper dive, read our Topo MTN Racer 4 review.
The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 ($160): More Pop, More $
For a sportier daily trainer, the Vectiv Enduris 4 is a worthy step up. It shares a similarly moderate stack at 32/26mm, but a nitrogen-infused TPU midsole and integrated plate deliver noticeably more propulsion and support as the miles accumulate. The wider toe box does slightly reduce confidence on technical terrain, and the price is a meaningful jump over the Genesis 2. For runners who want a more responsive ride as their primary focus, the Enduris 4 has the advantage. For those after a slightly simpler, more traditional daily trainer feel at a lower price, the Genesis 2 still nails the assignment. For more, read our review of The North Face's Vectiv Enduris 4.
Like the original, the Salomon Genesis 2 is a stable, durable daily trainer built for runners looking for an affordable and versatile setup. It’s not especially poppy, but it’s dependable, comfortable for non-ultra distances, and built to take a beating.
Cushioning
Responsiveness
Stability
Traction
Durability
Sustainability
The Topo Athletic Mtn Racer 4 is one of our favorite shoes for long days in the mountains. It’s stable yet lively, with a locked-in fit, exceptional traction, and enough cushion to handle big miles. Just don’t expect exceptional plushness or race-ready rebound.
Cushioning
Responsiveness
Stability
Traction
Durability
Sustainability
The North Face Vectiv Enduris 4 features a lively, nitrogen-infused foam and a propulsion plate, rare at this price point. With balanced cushioning, a planted feel, an approachable fit, and strong durability, it’s one of our favorite all-rounders.
Cushioning
Responsiveness
Stability
Traction
Durability
Sustainability
I find the Salomon Genesis 2 to be a trail runner that’s easy to recommend. Its fit is fairly safe, and wider than what you typically see from Salomon, and the medium-thickness, medium-firm cushioning is predictable and reasonably comfortable. For a $150 shoe, that’s a lot of positives—not to mention its solid traction and durability. So long as you don’t want heavy cushioning or prioritize top-end speed, the Genesis 2 is an all-around good buy.
gear up and go
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026curated for you