Updated:
Jan 19, 2025Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Rugged
Weight
2 lb. 5.7 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather/synthetic
Pros
Cons
Salomon Quest 4 GTX
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Hiking Boots.
My initial impression of the Salomon Quest 4 was a stiff, bulky boot, which continued to be borne out during testing. While it offers plenty of cushion—especially underfoot, at the ankle, and at the heel—the Quest 4 is an exceptionally rigid hiking boot made for supporting heavy pack loads, which downgrades its overall comfort score.
I experienced a lengthy break-in period while testing the Salomon Quest 4 GTX; during my first seven outings, the leather-and-synthetic upper offered quite a bit of resistance. The boot tended to bend at the toe rather than with my foot as I strode, which left the top of my foot sore. For the first few wears, I even found myself changing my gait to compensate. The boot softened over time, but I recommend breaking it in before heading out on any high-mileage backpacking trips.
I will note that comfort can also be a long game, and compared to less supportive models, the Quest 4 should help your feet feel (relatively) fresh if you’re hiking big miles while carrying a heavy load. The stiff and supportive design holds the foot steady and absorbs all of the undulations of off-camber terrain, which helps to ward off foot fatigue on long days—just make sure you’ve broken in the boot already.
If schlepping a large pack over long miles on a rugged trail is your usual M.O., the Quest 4 has you covered: It has a stiff, beefed-up chassis (a term taken from the manufacturing world that refers to a structure’s supportive frame) and includes two reinforced lace eyelets in the middle of the boot that connect the top of the boot to the midsole. This design bolsters lateral support and keeps your foot secure inside the boot, boosting stability as you weave through uneven terrain with a heavy load. Combined with the generous above-the-ankle height, the Quest 4 is an easy boot to trust; as a frequent ankle-roller, I never questioned its stability and support.
Although stiffness is the Quest 4’s calling card, it felt too rigid for me; I wished this boot had more flexibility and was a bit less bulky. (Admittedly, I prefer more minimalist boots or hiking shoes.) In most cases, the Quest will be overkill for day hiking. But for those who love a supportive boot (and don’t mind the accompanying compromises) and frequently schlep a heavy load into technical terrain, it’s an excellent option.
I tested the Salomon Quest 4 in Norway’s Lofoten Islands, and its outsole held fast to every type of terrain that I encountered: On one hike that connected small fishing villages around a rocky coastline, the boot kept me upright as I scrambled over large boulders that were slick with ocean spray. The outsole’s Contagrip rubber compound (Salomon’s in-house concoction) never faltered, even as I crossed slippery seaweed and trudged through dense mud. Here, the Quest 4’s deep, spaced-out lugs and siphoning channels easily dealt with sloppy conditions. Even on exposed, wet rock slabs this boot gave me the utmost confidence.
Following a common theme in this review, the Quest 4’s glue-like traction might be overkill if you’re just hiking on dirt singletrack. Once again, this boot’s best application is on technical trails and under a cumbersome backpack, in which case I’d welcome the secure grip.
This boot is built to last. In my testing, the Salomon Quest 4 GTX held up to over 25 days of use with the only sign of wear being some scratches on the plastic lace hooks. The leather and woven synthetic fabric upper can stand up to the technical terrain that this boot is meant for, and the Contagrip outsole receives high marks as well: After traversing miles of rocky trail, the rubber looks brand-spankin’ new. Even considering the Quest 4’s relatively high price point, it’s still a great value—this is a hiking boot that will endure hard use over multiple seasons.
The Salomon Quest 4 has a toe encased in a thick rubber overlay, and its equally brawny rubber rand extends around the circumference of the boot. I never stubbed my toe on Lofoten’s rock-strewn trails, and the protection is so sturdy that I actually had a hard time finding my toe to measure fit. A high, over-the-ankle cuff also fends off scrapes and debris that might find their way into shorter boots. The Quest 4’s foam midsole/hardy rubber outsole combo is also quite thick and sturdy—I felt protected from any sharp objects that might be underfoot.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
The Salomon Quest 4 GTX checks in at 2 pounds 5.7 ounces for the women's pair, which lands it on the far right of the bell curve for models that aren’t explicitly meant for mountaineering or expedition-style backpacking. In contrast, popular hiking boots like the Hoka Kaha 3 GTX and Lowa Renegade weigh considerably lighter, at 2 pounds 1.6 ounces and 2 pounds 2.2 ounces, respectively. These boots offer laudable support under the weight of a heavy pack but aren’t without compromise: The Kaha 3 is supremely plush but less durable and stable than the Quest 4, while the Renegade Evo is more flexible and mobile without compromising too much support and protection (see our full comparison below).
Looking at a hiking boot’s weight can provide great insight into a variety of factors, including durability, support, agility, and comfort. Most of the time, a heavier boot means a more long-lasting and stable boot, while a lighter boot will be more nimble and cushioned. There’s always a tradeoff, and where you land on the spectrum will come down to your personal needs and preferences.
Waterproof Liner
The Quest 4 sports a Gore-Tex liner, our pick for the best waterproofing on the market. The boot’s tall height is also a huge plus in this category and means you can walk through ankle-deep puddles or streams without water entering at the collar (while trudging through 4-inch-deep bogs in the Lofoten Islands, my feet remained dry). All told, the Quest 4 is a top performer in terms of waterproofing, making it a great pick for routes with glacier travel, boggy tundra, shallow river crossings, and more.
Despite Gore-Tex’s reputation as a waterproof/breathable membrane, the Quest 4 isn’t breathable at all. This is mostly due to the boot’s thick, durable upper material. On cold and wet days, this wasn’t a problem; in dry and warmer conditions, though, I looked forward to letting my feet breathe after a full day of hiking.
Lacing System
This boot’s lacing system is sturdy and secure. I never needed to re-tie or tighten my boots throughout the day. The deep lace hooks are made from hard plastic; the largest hooks, located just below the ankle, have ridges inside to hold the lace in place. Compared to other boots I’ve worn, the Quest 4’s laces feel thicker and more sturdy. Overall, the placement of the hooks and lace construction feel thoughtfully designed to promote stability via a dialed-in fit.
I typically wear a women’s 6 or 6.5, depending on the brand. That said, I tested the Salomon Quest 4 in size 6, and it still felt big, so I recommend sizing down by half a size from your normal measurement. The last of this hiking boot is very spacious; if you have a wide foot it might feel great for you, but if you have a narrow foot like me, you might swim in the Quest 4. I was able to make the fit work with thicker socks, but it still felt wider than I prefer. The boot’s heel was thankfully snug, but the midfoot and toe box were very roomy.
Hoka Kaha 3 GTX ($240): Lighten Your Step
There's no denying the Quest 4's impressive protection and stability on technical trails and rocky terrain, but you'll want to ask yourself if its worth the compromises. These days, more and more hikers are opting for lighter weight and more cushioned hiking boots for the all-day comfort they offer. The Hoka Kaha 3 GTX offers healthy doses of both worlds, with enough plush midsole foam to keep your feet happy, alongside high-end traction, Gore-Tex waterproofing, and a durable leather build. It lacks the outright structure and stability of the Quest 4, but is a well-balanced boot for most hikers. For more, read our review of the Hoka Kaha 3 GTX.
Lowa Renegade Evo GTX ($265): Beefy Boot Brethren
Like the Quest 4, the Lowa Renegade GTX is similarly known for combining durability and support in a burly package. The Renegade’s supple leather upper is slightly less stiff and surprisingly requires minimal break-in time, and the boot is lighter at 2 pounds 2.2 ounces for the women's pair. A polyurethane midsole underfoot means it can shoulder just as heavy a load as the Quest 4; however, this midsole isn’t as plush as the Quest 4’s EVA foam, so your feet might feel a little sorer after racking up miles in the Renegade. The boots run about the same in terms of durability, and the Renegade’s Megagrip outsole compound is also renowned for its stickiness. In the end, the choice between these two might come down to personal fit and price (the Renegade costs $35 more). For more, read our review of the Lowa Renegade GTX Mid.
For the roughest of terrain, the Quest is a burly and tough hiker with excellent waterproofing to boot. That said, it’s heavy and overkill for most conditions.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
If comfort is your end all and be all but you want the stability to back it up, it’s tough to beat the Kaha 3. A premium Vibram Megagrip outsole and Gore-tex membrane round out the list of high-end features. However, durability falls short of traditional leather models from brands like Lowa.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
The Renegade isn’t the lightest boot out there and has a classic design, but remains comfortable and highly capable. For challenging day hikes and backpacking, it’s a practical choice.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
A rigorous backpacking trip with high mileage and a heavy pack—think a long loop in the Winds or a high route in the Sierra—demands a similarly hardy hiking boot. If that’s the type of adventure you’re after, we unreservedly recommend the Salomon Quest 4 Gore-Tex, which is an especially good fit for those with regular-to-wide feet. This boot will help you bear the weight of an overnight pack while keeping you stable as you hike, a quality that’s enhanced by its burly traction and long-lasting construction. To be clear, if single overnighters or day hikes are your usual fare, or if you prize cushy comfort and nimble feet, we recommend a lighter and flexible design. But if you’re looking for a boot that can tackle the most demanding trails, few models will offer more confidence than the Quest 4.
hit the trail
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026curated for you