We spent a season testing the Smith Cache ($125) in the PNW, from blustery lift lines at Stevens Pass to sunny spring laps at Crystal Mountain, and it kept surprising us. For $125, it comes with MIPS, a comfortable fit with a wide adjustment range, and enough airflow to stay cool while hiking for extra turns. Its thin padding and basic ABS shell mean it isn’t very warm or especially streamlined, so skiers in deep cold or those who ski hard every day might want to upgrade. For everyone else, it’s one of the best-value ski helmets right now.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3 oz.
Construction
ABS
Vents
11 (5 adjustable)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Smith Cache MIPS
For this season's top lids, see our guide to the Best Ski Helmets.
For how simple and relatively featureless the Smith Cache is, I was impressed by how good it felt on my head. The interior has just the right amount of padding for me; it’s thinner than heavily cushioned buckets like the Smith Level MIPS, but that seems to be all this helmet needs. I never felt the need to wear a beanie to make up for the lack of cushion, and the combination of padding and thin mesh in key areas made it breathable and easy to wear. I never experienced any tight spots or pinch points, and was happy to keep the Cache on all day.
The ear pads are similarly minimalist. They’re not fuzzy or particularly soft, but have a dependable, midweight design that never pushed into my ears or felt too stiff. In fact, I was able to wear earrings under them, and they never pressed uncomfortably against my head. The fit system, a small dial at the back of the helmet, also offers a good range of adjustment; I can tighten it significantly when I’m not wearing anything underneath, or loosen it if I choose to rock a thin beanie on a cold day.
The only minor issue I noted was the chin strap, which was flat and stiff out of the box and stayed that way over time, rather than curving to fit my chin. It might soften and bend with more use, and honestly, this is more of an aesthetic concern than anything else. The strap is otherwise as easy to wear as the rest of this helmet, which is a comfort coup for a model that costs less than many lift tickets.
Warmth is probably the Cache’s biggest weakness, and even that isn’t so terrible. During testing, I concluded this is the perfect helmet for spring skiing or mild winter days (like we have in Washington, where I live), rather than the deep cold of high elevations or the Northeast. It doesn’t feel as thick and cozy as my Smith Vantage 2 MIPS, which makes sense given the Cache’s relatively light padding.
That being said, the Smith Cache MIPS provided all of the insulation I needed on a spring powder day at Stevens Pass. Standing still in the lift line with the temperature around 28 degrees, I was thrilled to find I wasn’t cold at all. The Cache’s thin padding also left room for a balaclava under the helmet, which made a huge difference. At the top of the chair, where 20-mph wind gusts were ripping, I felt the temps a bit more, but I was still comfortable; any colder and I would’ve gone with a beanie. As long as temperatures don’t dip much below the mid-20s, the Cache should hold up.
Ventilation is another area in which I was pleasantly surprised by the Cache’s performance. It has 11 vents total: two small openings at the front and nine at the back. You can adjust the five center-back vents by sliding a small tab; it was a bit hard to locate and operate with thick mittens, but having adjustable vents at this price point is a bonus.
Despite having fewer vents than helmets like the Sweet Protection Switcher and the Vantage, which have distinct Swiss cheese vibes, the Cache never made me feel too stuffy or hot while skiing, even in warm conditions or when I was hiking for bonus turns at Stevens Pass. It’s another reason why the Cache makes a great spring ski helmet—I was never dying to take it off on a toasty day at Crystal Mountain, even when I was hanging out and grabbing a quick beer in full sun at Campbell Basin Lodge.
At 1 pound, 3 ounces, the Smith Cache MIPS is about average for a ski helmet. Continuing the theme of this review, that’s a win given its price and place in the market, as well as its burly ABS construction. While you probably won’t want to take this helmet on long jaunts into the backcountry—I did, however, carry it on an in-bounds fitness skin at my local hill and it didn’t overburden my pack—its weight and bulk aren’t drawbacks for skiing at the resort.
Because the Cache isn’t overly heavy or overbuilt or overly feature-laden, I simply don’t notice it much on my head. It’s streamlined, and that’s all I need from a helmet on an average day on the slopes. It hugs my head well, and I never felt like I was fighting it while I bounced around all day, skiing bumps and side hits. Dedicated backcountry skiers might want to grab a lighter model like the Smith Summit MIPS (1 lb.), but for everyone else, the Cache will do just fine.
The Cache is a full ABS helmet, built with a hard plastic shell. ABS is affordable yet durable and is often used on entry-level models, which is certainly the case here. But, as I mentioned, the Cache largely avoids the bulbous, heavy look of similar budget buckets. In fact, the shell feels lighter and thinner than most other Smith helmets I’ve tried, and closer in look and feel to the in-mold Smith Method.
While ABS is a tougher material than polycarbonate, the Cache hasn't gone unscathed in testing. I’ve already acquired a few noticeable scratches from dropping it in the parking lot (oops). But that's par for the course for a helmet that sees a lot of use, and I anticipate the Cache will have a long lifespan.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
MIPS Liner
The Cache includes a MIPS liner between the interior padding and the shell. MIPS helps dissipate the impact of angled head hits by moving separately from the rest of the helmet. It’s become the baseline standard for buckets that are serious about protection, and it’s nice to see it in a helmet at this price point.
Smith sells the Cache in four sizes from small to XL. I have an average head shape and am usually a size medium in ski helmets. I prefer wearing Smith helmets because I mainly rock Smith goggles, and I love the brand’s integrated fit. I sometimes wear a thin balaclava under my helmet, or perhaps a thin beanie, so with a medium I always count on a bit of wiggle room.
I tested the Cache in a medium, and it fit exactly as I expected. The small dial on the back adjusts the tightness around the widest part of my head. It has a surprisingly large range from loose to tight, so it works for a variety of setups, from beanie to balaclava to bear head.
Smith Rodeo MIPS ($105): Budget-er
The Cache slides into Smith’s lineup as one rung above the $20-cheaper Rodeo. In our opinion, it’s worth the upgrade: the Cache is sleeker, adds adjustable ventilation, and its padding is nicer too. If price is your end-all, the Rodeo is more than serviceable. But the Cache makes a really strong case that a relatively small price difference can net you a lot of positives. For more, read our review of the Smith Rodeo MIPS.
Giro Ratio MIPS ($145): Similar (But Dated) Concept
Giro’s Ratio has been around for a while and always stood out as a sneaky feature-rich budget build. Like the Cache, it features an ABS hardshell construction alongside adjustable ventilation. The price has crept up with the Ratio, and it’s now a full $20 more than the Cache. The extra cost does get you more warmth and a cushier interior (if those are priorities), but the Cache is lighter and definitely looks more modern. We think it’s the better of the two, but both are strong options.
At $125, the Smith Cache packs a tough hardshell construction and adjustable ventilation into an impressively sleek shape that feels like it costs significantly more. It’s best for mild days and spring laps, not deep cold—but for budget-minded resort skiers, it’s a steal.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
The Smith Rodeo is a modern take on the classic hardshell lid, sporting ABS plastic that meets the Global Recycling Standard. It's classically bulky and not as refined or comfy as pricier alternatives, but we appreciate the value.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
With a soft, warm interior and adjustable ventilation, the Giro Ratio is a great-value lid for resort skiing. It’s bulkier and won’t have as long a lifespan as premium alternatives, but it’s among the most versatile budget designs we’ve tested.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
The Smith Cache MIPS is for skiers who want a comfortable, protective helmet without paying premium prices. At $125, it comes with MIPS, plus ventilation that stays comfortable on warm spring days and a fit dial that adjusts enough to work with everything from a bare head to a beanie. Given its lower warmth profile, the Cache is a great fit for resort skiers in milder climates and anyone who skis mostly on mellow or springtime days. But if you regularly ski in the teens or single digits, want plush padding, or like a helmet with a bit more going on on the shell, you might want to spend up for a more premium lid.
pray for snow
Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Ski Bibs of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Ski Pants of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Ski Boots of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Base Layers of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Ski Gloves of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Ski Mittens of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Ski Backpacks of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026curated for you