Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate
Weight
2 lb. 2.6 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Synthetic/leather
Pros
Cons
Asolo Falcon Evo GV
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Hiking Boots.
The Asolo Falcon Evo GV is comfortable right out of the box, requiring little to no break-in time—a major win for a hiking boot. Its suede and nylon upper is noticeably softer than typical leather models and conformed to my foot immediately. At 2 pounds 2.6 ounces per pair, the Falcon is also fairly lightweight, which helps keep my feet happy on long trail days.
I took the Asolo Falcon Evo GV on a four-day hike in Washington State’s Enchantments, where an easy, hardpacked trail led to a rugged climb up loose rock and talus, eventually ending in a cross-country zone littered with boulders and snow. Despite their softer build, the Falcon felt like too much boot on the smooth, established trails at the beginning and end of the trip—especially when my group picked up the pace. On the last day’s easy miles, I even developed some hot spots—not uncommon for hiking boots, but enough to remind me why I often prefer trail runners for high-mileage days.
That said, the Falcon delivered exactly what I’d hoped for on the moderate-to-rugged sections in the middle of our route: equal parts comfort and performance. I’m always willing to trade some stability for a nimble, comfortable ride (part of my trail-runner bias), and in that sense, the Falcon was a great fit for my hiking style.
The Asolo Falcon Evo GV sits in the middle of the pack when it comes to support and stability. Its suede and nylon upper is noticeably softer and more flexible than many traditional hiking boots, which enhances comfort but reduces structure. Depending on your preferences, this likely makes the Falcon a great choice for well-maintained trails but less ideal for rugged terrain. Most hikers will want more rigidity and ankle support for boulder-hopping, navigating scree, or tackling technical off-trail routes.
Compared to burlier boots, the Falcon feels a bit outclassed. The Lowa Camino Evo GTX is in a league of its own, tipping the scales at 3 pounds 8.4 ounces with unmatched stability, while the Salomon Quest 4 GTX—a more comparable model—offers better support but also weighs significantly more at 2 pounds 14 ounces. Even the budget-friendly Merrell Moab 3 Mid ($150) provides slightly more structure underfoot. That said, not every hiker or trail requires maxed-out support. As I mentioned above, I tend to favor hiking in trail running shoes, and the Falcon struck the perfect balance between flexibility and stability for the Enchantments’ cross-country terrain.
The Asolo Falcon Evo GV features a Vibram Megagrip rubber outsole, which is widely respected for its durability and grip—especially on rock. On my four-day backpacking trip through Washington’s Cascades, I found the sole rigid and confidence-inspiring, providing solid traction while boulder-hopping and cruising up slabs. However, the outsole’s lugs aren’t as deep or aggressive as those on some competing models, leading to a less secure feel on loose terrain like snow, scree, and mud.
The build quality of the Asolo Falcon Evo GV is excellent, and Asolo’s reputation for long-lasting footwear helps justify the higher price point. I’ve had great experiences with Asolo hiking boots in the past—I wore a previous model of the Asolo Finder for 10 years of heavy use before finally replacing them.
That said, the Falcon GV doesn’t quite match the longevity of burlier models. Its suede and nylon upper is soft and flexible, which enhances comfort but won’t hold up as long as full-leather designs. Additionally, the shallower outsole lugs will wear down faster than the deeper, more aggressive tread found on similar hiking boots. By comparison, boots like the Lowa Renegade Evo GTX and Salomon Quest 4 GTX trade some comfort for increased durability, thanks to their stiffer, more robust builds. While the Falcon offers a softer, more forgiving ride, those prioritizing maximum longevity may want to consider a more heavy-duty alternative. It’s worth noting that the Falcon GV can be resoled, but given the soft upper, it likely won’t last long enough to make a second life worthwhile.
The Asolo Falcon GV Evo offers decent foot protection but isn’t the most rugged option out there. Its toe cap is noticeably less burly than those on beefier boots like the Salomon Quest 4 GTX, and while the suede overlays cover the high-tenacity nylon upper, they don’t add much in terms of toughness. That said, the ankle padding is a highlight, providing a solid buffer against rocks and branches. In the end, the Falcon GV feels more vulnerable on rocky, technical terrain than the more protective, heavy-duty boots in this guide and is best suited for established trails and moderate scrambling.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
At 2 pounds 2.6 ounces per pair, the Asolo Falcon Evo GV falls squarely into the midweight category for hiking boots. It’s certainly not the lightest option—a synthetic model like the Merrell Moab Speed 2 weighs just 1 pound 12.2 ounces, and even the suede La Sportiva TX Hike Mid Leather GTX comes in over three ounces lighter at 1 pound 15 ounces. On the other hand, the Falcon is significantly lighter than burlier models like the Salomon Quest 4 GTX (2 lb. 14 oz.) and Lowa Renegade GTX (2 lb. 9.6 oz.), though this weight savings comes with trade-offs in support, traction, and durability.
Many of us at Better Trail favor hiking shoes or trail runners over boots—they’re lighter, faster, less prone to blisters, and dry quickly, making them the go-to for long-mileage days. But they come with their own trade-offs: less stability under heavy loads and faster wear rates. The Asolo Falcon Evo GV strikes a solid middle ground, offering a boost in stability and durability without the over-the-top weight of a leather boot. If we’re going to opt for a boot, this one makes a compelling best-of-both-worlds choice.
I typically wear a U.S. women’s 7.5 (EU 38) and have normal to slightly wide feet, but since Asolo boots tend to run a bit large, I opted for a size 7 in the Asolo Falcon Evo GV. The fit felt fairly standard overall, and I found them comfortable right out of the box. They did feel slightly narrow in the midfoot, but this was easily remedied with proper lacing, and I had no major issues with fit during testing.
La Sportiva TX Hike Mid Leather GTX ($199): More Grip, Less Money
We’re fans of midweight hiking boots for their impressive performance at a reasonable weight. The La Sportiva TX Hike Mid Leather GTX falls into the same category performance-wise, but checks in over three ounces less than the Asolo Falcon at 1 pound 15 ounces total. It features an all-leather upper compared to the Falcon’s mix of suede and synthetics (arguably more durable but less breathable and can grow heavy when wet), beats out the Asolo in traction (La Sportiva is a climbing shoe brand first and foremost), and is much cheaper at just $199. If you frequently hike in warm conditions, the Falcon GV will be a bit more breathable, but the La Sportiva TX Hike Mid offers better value for similar performance (it’s also available in a synthetic version for $189). For more, read our in-depth review of the La Sportiva TX Hike Mid Leather GTX.
Lowa Renegade Evo GTX ($265): More Boot, More Support
At nearly the same price as the Asolo Falcon GV, the Lowa Renegade GTX brings more structure and durability to the table. At 2 pounds 9.6 ounces, it’s heavier but also more supportive, protective, and long-lasting, thanks to its full leather upper. If you don’t mind the tradeoffs of a full leather boot, the Renegade will be the higher-performance choice for hikers carrying heavy packs or tackling rough terrain. But for those who prioritize comfort and agility, the Falcon remains a strong alternative at a lower weight. To learn more, read our Lowa Renegade GTX Mid review.
For backpacking in moderate terrain and potentially wet conditions, the Falcon is a solid all-around hiking boot with a quality build. We appreciate the comfort and padding but wish the traction were a bit more substantial to match the rest of the boot’s capabilities.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
A spin-off of La Sportiva’s popular TX approach shoes, this minimalist leather boot is surprisingly capable in most terrain and conditions. You can find more protective or rugged models, but we appreciate the balance of comfort and performance of the TX Hike Mid.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
The Renegade isn’t the lightest boot out there and has a classic design, but remains comfortable and highly capable. For challenging day hikes and backpacking, it’s a practical choice.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
We like the Asolo Falcon Evo GV—and Asolo boots in general—for their blend of comfort, weight, and build quality. For day hiking and backpacking on moderate trails, the Falcon is a solid choice. Anything easier, and we’d recommend sticking with a low-top trail runner or hiking shoe—you’ll simply be more comfortable. At the other end of the spectrum, the Falcon GV won’t provide the level of support and protection a lot of people will want for cross-country travel, though our tester appreciated its balance of comfort and performance. If you typically wear a hiking shoe or trail runner, the Falcon offers a natural step up—without the stiffness, clunkiness, or break-in time of a traditional leather hiking boot.
hit the trail
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Fleece Jackets of 2026curated for you