Updated:
Jan 19, 2025Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate/easy
Weight
2 lb. 5.6 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
Hoka Kaha 2 GTX
Note: The Kaha 2 GTX was updated to the "3" for 2025. The Kaha 3 GTX has similar intentions as the "2" reviewed here but offers a number of noteworthy improvements. Hoka tightened up the boot's midsole and outsole to look and act more like a hiking boot than a running shoe—we expect the sleeker profile and robust toe cap to go a long way to improve stability and durability. The Kaha 3 also features plusher cushion than the outgoing model and a closer fit, thanks to Gore-Tex's Invisible Fit construction.
Let me get this out of the way first: I’ve never worn a hiking boot this comfortable before. The Kaha 2 is seriously plush, a quality that means a great deal to me: I have both fibromyalgia and hypermobility, and the feel of a hiking boot can make or break my on-trail experience. Even though the Kaha 2 has a majority Nubuck leather upper, I didn’t experience any break-in period. The highlight, though, is the boot’s towering midsole, which looks funky but feels like you’re walking on a cloud. (That doesn’t mean the Kaha 2 is sloppy; see my notes below on its support and stability.) The deeply rockered outsole (both at the heel and toe) also reduced my stride impact, helping cushion my knees and joints.
I was also particularly impressed by this boot’s heel-cuff design. Its collar drops down in the back into a U-shape, with a soft pull-tab in the middle. The result is no rubbing at the ankle and great freedom of movement while striding. The Kaha 2’s polyester mesh liner is also soft; I appreciated the moisture-wicking effect of the material and never felt that my feet got overly sweaty. Simply put, the Kaha 2 saved me a lot of pain both on and off the trail.
As someone with fibromyalgia and hypermobility, structure in a hiking boot is just as important to me as comfort. The Kaha 2’s over-the-ankle cuff hugged my ankles securely; at first I was worried the drop-collar in the back would lead to instability, but I found that as long as I laced the boot well, it actually provided a near-ideal balance of support and mobility. In addition to lessening impact (as I mentioned above), the boot’s rockered outsole contributed to my agility—and thus balance—on rocky, uneven surfaces. (The Kaha 2’s broad platform was a minor hindrance to other testers, however, who found that it snagged on rocks before they became used to the boot’s width.)
For such a light boot, the Kaha 2 handles heavier loads than expected. During an overnight climb of Guadalupe Peak in Texas, I ripped off 3,000 feet of elevation gain over 10 miles while carrying a 40-pound backpack and felt stable the entire time. The Kaha 2’s outsole is stiffer than it looks (I wouldn’t hesitate to wear this boot with microspikes on snowy or icy trails), and the upper hugs your foot and keeps it from shifting around when you tighten the laces. For technical scrambling with or without a pack, we’d probably recommend a hiking boot or hiking shoe with less width and cushion, but if you’re hiking on trail and place a premium on weight, the Kaha 2 delivers.
Hoka designers built the Kaha 2’s outsole with Vibram Megagrip, which we consider the industry’s best rubber compound for general hiking (Salomon’s Contagrip comes close). I found it quite sticky on most terrain, including Guadalupe Peak’s slick, smooth rock faces, the mud on my family’s farm in Texas, and the loose, dry dirt I encountered while scampering around the badlands of New Mexico. The Kaha’s outsole has 5-millimeter lugs that dug in for a powerful grip on all the terrain I experienced during testing. And given the extra-wide footprint of the Kaha 2’s sole, you get more purchase on the ground than with narrower designs.
Although I’m a big fan of the Kaha 2’s traction, the outsole’s soft rubber and exposed foam are prone to damage. It exhibited wear and tear after I hiked just a couple of rocky trails, and I predict that after a full season of backpacking the soles will be pretty beat up. Given the Kaha 2’s price, prospective buyers should definitely consider the longevity they’re looking for in a boot.
On the positive side, the majority Nubuck leather upper should hold up well. The quality of stitching is high, and Nubuck is famously abrasion- and tear-resistant. The upper’s synthetic fabric portion is comparatively soft and seems like it could rip rather easily, but it’s located only on the tongue and the ankle cuff and thus less likely to scrape against trail obstacles. Overall, durability is not the Kaha’s strongest attribute, but if you mostly hike on gravel paths, smooth rock surfaces, and dirt singletrack, it shouldn’t pose much of a concern.
Thanks to the Kaha 2’s monster midsole I barely felt any rocks underneath my feet, even though the boot lacks an underfoot rock plate. The midsole also grants “bumper” protection on the back and sides, as it splays out slightly from the boot’s upper as you stride. Additionally, the hiking boot is designed with a semi-rigid rubber toe cap to lessen direct hits. Although I didn’t explicitly test this out by kicking rocks while hiking in the Kaha 2, I can honestly say I never noticed any significant impact to my toes.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
For a boot this cushy, the Kaha 2 won’t weigh your feet down on the trail. A pair comes in at just a hair over 2 pounds, which puts this boot right in line with trail running shoe/hiking boot hybrids such as the Altra Lone Peak Hiker (1 lb. 11.4 oz.; reviewed here) and the On Cloudrock Mid WP (1 lb. 15.1 oz.). The Kaha 2 offers a much higher level of comfort and protection than either of those models, though, and will ward off foot soreness over many more miles.
Classic all-leather hiking boot models, such as the Lowa Renegade we reviewed (which has a polyurethane midsole rather than a foam one, as well as a wrap-around PU frame) are noticeably heavier—the Lowa checks in at 2 pounds 9.6 ounces. They’re also (usually) more durable and supportive, but extra weight on your feet can take its toll as the miles pile up. Besides, for a boot this light, the Kaha 2 punches well above its weight in terms of stability.
Waterproof Liner
My hikes in the Kaha 2 GTX were fairly dry, so I didn’t give the Gore-Tex waterproof membrane a full workout. However, the few times I walked through puddles my feet stayed dry. I found the boot to be fairly breathable and did not experience any excessive moisture inside—even in the Texas desert’s winter warmth (which got up to the mid-70s). Given that Gore-Tex is the membrane to beat in terms of both waterproofing and breathability, we wholeheartedly recommend the Kaha for wet conditions. The one caveat is that you’ll want to be aware of the heel cut-out when crossing streams or puddles, as it decreases the overall height of the boot and would be the first place for water to enter.
Lacing System
The Hoka Kaha’s lacing system is thoughtfully designed and offers a notably secure feel. Half of the lacing system goes through eyelets, while the other half goes through locking cleats—a useful design when it comes to taking the boot on and off without struggle. However, the locking cleats are a little difficult to thread the lace through, especially if you’re trying to move quickly. Once I secured the laces, though, I never had to stop to readjust them and they never came untied. Thanks to the Kaha 2’s padding I was also able to make the laces very tight, yet still felt like I had lots of comfort and room to move within the boot. In sum, the laces are a tad finicky, but once they’re tied, you’ll appreciate the comfortable and secure feel.
I’m typically a men’s 13 or 14, and tested the Kaha 2 in a size 13. I often find that I land between sizes, and my foot runs wide, so finding a boot that fits is challenging. Luckily, the Kaha 2 excelled in the width department. It did feel like it ran a tad large in the length for a 13, but that worked out well for me and my ‘tweener sizing. And with minimal break-in period, the Kaha 2 was one of the most comfortable hiking boots I have ever worn out of the box.
On Cloudrock Mid WP ($220): Hybrid Design, Middling Performance
With one glance it’s clear that the On Cloudrock Mid WP offers less cushion than the Kaha 2. Sure, the Cloudrock is also a more nimble boot thanks to its trail runner-inspired design, but it can’t handle as heavy a pack load as the Kaha 2, and offers less foot protection as well. The Cloudrock also uses proprietary rubber in its outsole and has a proprietary waterproof membrane—materials that won’t perform as well as the Kaha 2’s brand-name components. Given that it’s only $20 less than the Kaha 2, the latter is an easy choice if you’re not swayed by the former’s sleeker design. For more, read our review of the On Cloudrock 2.
Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX ($195): Better Value for Similar Performance
On its face, the Kaha 2 GTX should be leading the charge for Hoka on the hiking boot front, but the cheaper Anacapa might just have something to say about that. Let’s start with the similarities: both boots are supremely comfortable with that plush feel Hoka is known for. The Anacapa has a little less cushion, and the padding around the ankle isn’t quite as substantial either. On the flipside, it felt more nimble on the trail to us, and we appreciate the $45 cost savings. Given that Hokas tend to pack out early due to all of those super soft, lightweight materials, dollar for dollar we give the slight nod to the Anacapa. In the end, you get similar performance for less money. For more, read our review of the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX.
If comfort is your end all and be all but you want the stability to back it up, it’s tough to beat the Kaha 2. A premium Vibram Megagrip outsole and Gore-tex membrane round out the list of high-end features. However, durability falls short of traditional leather models from brands like Lowa.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
This unique hiking boot is a comfortable and stylish option for non-technical trails, with more stability than you’d expect. However, they aren’t particularly protective, and traction falls short of the competition.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
For those who prioritize comfort, the Anacapa is a plush, breathable hiking boot from Hoka with a lot to like. Throw in a lower price tag than the Kaha line and a lighter weight, and we’re officially intrigued.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
It’s no small feat to be crowned the most comfortable hiking boot on the market, but that’s the accolade we’re bestowing on the Hoka Kaha 2 GTX. With its eye-catching, enormous midsole that cushions your stride with every step and straight-out-the-box comfort, this is the boot for hikers who want to eliminate foot pain and float down the trail no matter the mileage. The Kaha 2’s aesthetic might not be for everyone, it’s certainly not cheap, and we have concerns about its outsole durability. But your feet will thank you for some of the most comfortable hours they’ve experienced on trail.
get outside, better
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Sustainability
About Our Sustainability Ratings