The Muck Boot Arctic Sport II Mid ($145) is a workhorse winter boot that has earned a coveted spot by our door all winter. It's the boot we reach for nine times out of 10—fully waterproof, easy to slip on, and consistently warm and cozy from the teens to the low 40s. We haven’t found another boot that comes close to matching the confidence we feel when wearing it: The rubber-and-neoprene construction and tall shaft inspire confidence when trudging through foot-deep snow or substantial puddles, and the feeling of protection and warmth is immediate upon putting it on. One of our testers has had her pair for five years of routine winter use, and they still look brand new. The all-out functionality of a Muck Boot is a huge selling point for the daily grind of cold, wet winter living—if it’s the style you're going for, we stand wholeheartedly behind this one.
Warmth
Walking Comfort
Traction
Waterproofing
Durability
Sustainability
Upper
Rubber & neoprene
Insulation
Neoprene (5mm) & fleece
Boot Height
12 in.
Weight
2 lb.
Waterproofing
Rubber & membrane
Pros
Cons
Muck Boot Arctic Sport II Mid
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Women's Winter Boots.
The Muck Boot Arctic Sport II Mid is one of the warmest winter boots I’ve ever worn. The 5-millimeter neoprene inner bootie, fleece lining, and well-insulated sole kept my feet consistently cozy in temperatures dipping into the low 20s Fahrenheit. Muck Boot rates them for comfort down to -40 degrees Fahrenheit, which feels ambitious, but I'd easily trust them into the teens and single digits. On the other hand, they can also flex into rainy conditions in the upper 30s.
On a trip to Washington's Methow Valley, temperatures mostly hovered between 25 and 35 degrees Fahrenheit, with mixed precipitation ranging from snow to rain to slush. In those conditions, the Muck Boot Arctic Sport II Mid’s combination of warmth and reliable waterproofing was exceptional—I slipped them on over my medium-weight socks between skate-skiing laps and wore them to the trailhead for a backcountry tour. I could have easily fit heavier socks on a colder day, which speaks to the roomy fit and warmth headroom these boots offer.
One caveat worth noting: the Arctic Sport II Mid isn't particularly breathable. Given that it's my go-to boot for quick errands, I end up wearing it a lot while driving in the winter, and it doesn't take long in the car for my feet and legs to start sweating. On a few occasions, I've pulled over to take them off for the drive.
The Arctic Sport II Mid is remarkably comfortable for a rubber and neoprene boot. The shaft is supple enough to walk in without any catching or folding, the cushioning underfoot is solid without feeling spongy, and the weight never becomes a burden. Compared to my tall XTRATUF boots, they feel noticeably less noisy and cumbersome underfoot. And after a day in ski boots, sliding them on is pure relief.
But while the Arctic Sport pulls off the slip-on design better than most, there are limitations. With no lacing or cinching system to secure the foot, I wouldn't want to walk more than a mile or two or tackle anything with significant elevation gain. My foot shifts enough inside that longer distances or technical terrain would get uncomfortable. For shoveling the driveway, evening walks, and quick errands though, the comfort level is genuinely impressive.
The Arctic Sport II Mid's traction is above average for a winter boot. The sticky rubber outsole and deep lugs perform confidently across snow, slush, wet sidewalks, and tricky trails, and I've found them more reassuring on ice than most winter boots I've worn, although nothing short of microspikes will make ice feel truly secure. Where the Arctic Sport II falls a bit short is on steep hardpacked snow, where the sole's relative flexibility and lug pattern can't quite match the bite of a stiffer boot like the Sorel Caribou. For everyday winter terrain, though, the traction is another one of the boot's strengths.
The Arctic Sport II Mid's rubber-and-neoprene construction makes it about as waterproof as a boot can get—the only way to get more protection is to go with the Tall version, which is about 5 inches taller. Both the rubber and the neoprene are fully waterproof—Muck Boot lines the neoprene with a waterproof membrane. Wearing these, I feel absolutely impenetrable—I can wade through substantial puddles, rivers, and deep powder without a second thought. Leavenworth offered every kind of winter condition imaginable this year, including a historic flood, and the Muck Boot Arctic Sport II Mid was a reliable companion through the slushy roads, large puddles, and deep snow.
After two and a half months of regular use—walking around town, wearing them to work on wet days, multiple trips to the Methow Valley, a snowmobile ride, and plenty of time tossed around the back of my car—the Arctic Sport II Mid looks and feels as good as new. There are no signs of sole or seam separation, no fraying on the neoprene upper, and nothing to suggest the boot has done any work this winter—which it certainly has. Another Better Trail tester has had her pair for five years, and they still look unscathed. Rubber and neoprene are inherently durable materials, and Muck Boot's construction quality backs that up. These are the kind of winter boots you buy once and use for the rest of your life.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
PFAS-Free Waterproofing
The waterproofing materials used in winter boots, such as membranes and durable water-repellent finishes, can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses PFAS-free materials, while a red X means some of the materials contain PFAS.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Leather
Responsible leather is typically sourced from suppliers certified by the Leather Working Group (LWG), a third-party nonprofit that evaluates tanneries on factors such as water and energy use, chemical and waste management, emissions, traceability, and worker safety, and assigns ratings ranging from Bronze to Gold. A green check mark indicates a product uses responsibly sourced leather, a yellow check mark indicates the brand sources responsible leather for the majority of its products but does not specify it at the product level, and a red X indicates the product does not use responsibly sourced leather.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one of the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
The Arctic Sport II Mid is a no-frills boot—no lacing system, no buckles, no cinches. A sturdy pull tab at the back makes them easy to pull on with one hand, although I can often do it hands-free. It’s a small thing, but being able to slip on a pair of boots adds a huge amount of convenience for when I’m running out the door with my hands full.
While the Arctic Sport II look like standard gum boots, they don’t suffer the same fit issues: Thanks to the neoprene construction, they never feel floppy or loose. Compared to my tall XTRATUF boots, which can feel cumbersome and clunky with every step, the Arctic Sport II Mid is noticeably more secure underfoot.
The Muck Boot Arctic Sport II Mid only comes in whole sizes. I typically wear a women's 7.5 and sized down to a 7 based on a recommendation I read online—and it was the right call. The fit was perfect for my normal-width feet, even with thicker socks. If you're between sizes, size down.
Fubuki Niseko 3.0 ($159): Personality For Days
The Fubuki Niseko 3.0 and the Arctic Sport II Mid are both fully waterproof slip-on boots with devoted followings, but they appeal to different sensibilities. The Niseko's wide, distinctive silhouette and bold aesthetic give it a personality the Arctic Sport simply can’t match. However, it doesn’t win out in the practical metrics: The Niseko is not as warm, offers less grip on ice and slippery terrain, and is less flexible and comfortable to walk in than the Arctic Sport’s snugger rubber-and-neoprene construction. Both are insulated, waterproof boots, but one errs more toward practicality while the other finds its edge with style. For more, read our Fubuki Niseko 3.0 review.
Bogs Arcata ($185): Lace it Up
The Bogs Arcata covers similar everyday winter-wear territory as the Arctic Sport II Mid, but the two boots diverge in design. Whereas the Arctic Sport slips on completely hands-free and prioritizes waterproofing and warmth above all else, the Arcata adds a lacing system for a more refined look and a more secure, dialed-in fit. It's not as practical in deep puddles or snow, though, and the lacing system can be one more thing to deal with when your hands are full or cold. Both are genuinely excellent for consistently cold, wet weather, but the Arctic Sport is the one we reach for when conditions get serious. For more, read our review of the Bogs Arcata.
The Arctic Sport II Mid is a fully waterproof, insulated, slip-on workhorse that handles cold, wet winter conditions with complete confidence. If you’re looking for function, it’s one of the boots we recommend most.
Warmth
Walking Comfort
Traction
Waterproofing
Durability
Sustainability
The Fubuki Niseko 3.0 is a fashion-first, fully waterproof boot that has earned it a cult following for good reason. It’s effortless to slip on, surprisingly warm, and unlike anything else in the category—just don’t expect to hike in it.
Warmth
Walking Comfort
Traction
Waterproofing
Durability
Sustainability
Don't let the Arcata fool you with its style—this is a warm, waterproof, and surprisingly capable everyday winter boot that completely won over our tester. She loved slipping her feet into the cozy interior and appreciated that the laced design was still loose enough to slip on hands-free.
Warmth
Walking Comfort
Traction
Waterproofing
Durability
Sustainability
The Muck Boot Arctic Sport II Mid is one of our favorite winter boots to recommend for its combination of reliable performance, comfort, and everyday convenience. It's especially well-suited to areas where winter means wet as much as cold—think 34 degrees and raining, or a snow dump that warms into slush by afternoon. The easy slip-on design makes it the kind of boot you reach for constantly: ours sits by the door, primed for quick errands, dog walks, après-ski, and driveway shoveling. It's not a boot for long hikes or when style is part of the equation, and the lack of breathability will catch up with you on warmer days or in the car. But for the daily grind of living in a mountain town or winter farm life, it's one of the most practical and well-rounded options in this roundup.
Go for it if you want a durable workhorse of a winter boot that's comfortable and easy to slip on, too.
Pass on it if you're prioritizing urban style or need a more secure fit for long walks.
get outside
Gear Guide
Best Women's Winter Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Synthetic Insulated Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Men's Winter Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Men's Winter Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Mittens of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Gloves of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Bibs of 2026