Updated:
Sep 10, 2025Norrøna’s flagship ski pant, the Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro ($799), is built for skiers and riders who hit the hill no matter the conditions. Category-leading Gore-Tex Pro construction and a very thick shell fabric ensure you’ll stay dry even in the worst weather, and we appreciate its feature-rich design and long-lasting build. But the Lofoten’s everything-and-the-kitchen-sink design does translate to a bulky build that’s less than ideal for big days in the backcountry. Losing the crossover resort and backcountry versatility diminishes the Lofoten’s appeal somewhat, especially considering its steep price tag.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
Best for
Resort
Waterproofing
3-layer Gore-Tex Pro
Insulation
Uninsulated
Fabric
200D
Pros
Cons
Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro
The Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro Pants were updated for the 2025-2026 season with a PFAS-free Gore-Tex Pro ePE membrane and a fresh set of colorways. The latest version retails for $799.
With its 3-layer Gore-Tex Pro material and 200-denier face fabric, the Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro is effectively impenetrable against the elements. This pant is designed to withstand whatever weather the mountain throws at you: We faced rapidly melting slush during testing, but the Lofoten handled it effortlessly—the moisture beaded up and ran off the face fabric. Even when I sat in the snow, there was no risk of waterlogging and I wasn’t worried about moisture soaking through at all. Plus, the high waistline, innovative waist cinch, articulated fit, and ankle gaiters make this ski pant an unfailing workhorse for deep powder days. Its design and performance mirror that of the well-known Arc’teryx Sabre Pant, but the Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro kicks the protection up a notch with the thicker material and ability to zip in an add-on bib ($69).
The uninsulated Lofoten offers minimal warmth, but at least its extremely windproof design keeps cold drafts at bay. Compared to more air-permeable models such as the Patagonia Stormstride, this ski pant will be a tad warmer due to its thick exterior. Otherwise, it’s a classic shell ski pant and requires layering underneath for any significant heat retention.
While the feature-rich Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro provides serviceable comfort for resort skiing, it falls short in this category if you press the pant into backcountry service. Inbounds, it works well as the outer shell of a layering system, and we appreciate that its articulated fit allows the pant to move with you and that the leg vents stay out of the way.
However, the Lofoten’s design may cause discomfort when you wear a pack or lack cushioning layers underneath: The high-waisted design and waist cinch can feel awkward and bulky if you’re wearing a ski pack or when the pant is worn next to skin (as some folks do while touring). Additionally, rather than soft fabric, the Lofoten has a zipper line at the top of the pant (where the optional bib attaches) that has high potential to chafe, especially under a pack. You won’t want to take this pant out in warmer weather, when you won’t have thick layers protecting you from the waist configuration.
The Lofoten doesn’t offer top-of-the-line breathability, but it’s capable for most temperatures and activity levels short of redlining. Gore-Tex Pro is commendably breathable, considering its high level of waterproofing. However, the pant’s thick, 200-denier face fabric is less airy than thinner materials like the one found in the 80D Arc'teryx Sabre Pant, so it's not our pick for spring skiing or heart rate-pumping tours.
That said, the Lofoten’s massive, nearly full-length vents on the outer thigh effectively manage excess heat if you decide to access in-bounds hike-to terrain. Notably, the Lofoten’s zippers are smooth and easy to operate, which is often not the case (many burly waterproof zippers tend to be sticky). On a balmy day at Stevens Pass Resort, I wore a lightweight merino base layer and felt comfortable on the shady north side in the morning. As the day progressed, I partially deployed the vents to dump heat; fully opening them allows you to shed heat in a hurry during a quick break or on the chairlift.
We could probably leave our durability note at “200-denier fabric” and get the point across—the Lofoten’s durability is the real deal. The quality of both the Lofoten’s material and construction is top-notch, just as you’d expect from both Norrøna and a ski pant at this price point: Not only do you get material that is on the “tough-as-nails” end of the spectrum, you also get premium Gore-Tex Pro construction. It’s not just the Lofoten’s fabric, either; all the small details have an equally sturdy look and feel, from the waist adjustment and big zipper pulls to the burly boot gaiters and reinforced cuffs. With the flawless construction of every seam, this pant is built to last, and will handle rough weather and sharp equipment with ease.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Repair Services
Repair services extend the lifespan of outdoor gear and reduce overall consumption, though programs vary widely. Some brands offer comprehensive repairs for a range of issues, while others provide limited or no repair support. A green check mark indicates a robust repair program, a yellow check mark indicates limited repair services, and a red X indicates the brand does not offer repair services.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
Pockets
The Lofoten’s extensive features are thoughtfully designed, and its four pockets are no exception. The two main thigh pockets are in the form of external fabric pouches that expand to accommodate your gear, ensuring anything stashed inside won’t impede on your leg space. There’s a dedicated, stretchy phone sleeve in the right thigh pocket, and the pant also includes a small hip pocket and a pocket at the back, great for credit cards, ID’s, chapstick, or other small items. My only complaint is the lack of a tether in one of the thigh pockets for an avalanche beacon.
Waist Cinch
The innovative waist cinch uses a cam-buckle near the back to redirect the pull of the hook-and-loop tabs. To tighten, you can pull the tabs towards the back through the buckle, then forward over the buckle, and secure them with the velcro. This arrangement, combined with the articulated seams, pulls any extra fabric in at the sides, as a tailor would when taking in a pair of pants. I always have to cinch ski pants down to accommodate my long legs and skinny build; while most pants leave a ton of awkwardly bunched material at the groin or back, the Lofoten felt natural and maintained a clean look.
Tester: 31" waist; 34" inseam
Size tested: Men’s large
I usually wear a size large, and the large in the Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro that I tested fit perfectly. The articulation at the knees allowed for freedom of movement, and the adjustable belt made it easy to cinch the waist for a comfortably snug fit. I will say that, although Norrøna classifies the pant as having a regular fit, the cut felt more on the athletic side of the spectrum, which suits my long legs nicely.
Arc’teryx Sabre ($600): The Reigning Champ
In many respects, the Arc’teryx Sabre sets the standard in the ski pant market. It’s built to transition smoothly between resort riding and storm skiing in the backcountry, featuring 3-layer Gore-Tex construction and a surprisingly soft hand feel. Compared with the Norrøna Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro ($649), the Sabre is lighter and has less of an overbuilt design, and yet it doesn’t give up much ground in terms of weather protection. If you prioritize a super-durable construction, the Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro is hard to beat, but the Sabre is a more well-rounded and versatile option. For more, read our review of the Arc'teryx Sabre pant.
Black Diamond Recon Stretch ($449): A Stretchy 50/50 Pant
Black Diamond’s Recon Stretch Pant also features 3-layer construction,
but its build is far more suited to backcountry use than the Lofoten Gore-Tex
Pro. The Recon’s in-house shell is significantly thinner and stretchier, and you
get a more minimalist waist design and a very well-executed beacon pocket. The
Recon sacrifices the bomber protection and durability of the Lofoten, but the
tradeoff is versatility for 50/50 resort and touring use at a $350 savings. For a deeper dive, see our Recon Stretch review.
Patagonia Triolet ($399): Barebones and Built for the Backcountry
To date, my favorite winter pant is the Patagonia Triolet; a bare-bones, ski mountaineering-oriented 75-denier Gore-Tex pant with a full-length, waist-to-cuff leg zip that offers maximal venting and allows you to put the pant on over ski boots. Although it has a similarly bulky waistband, the Triolet wins out for its backcountry-focused design—a lightweight build, double-cuff design with durable scuff guards, and the ability to vent as wide as I need. While the Lofoten could potentially earn its place in my lineup with similar venting capabilities with ¾ length zips, the Triolet remains my go-to backcountry pant. It’s also notably lighter (1 lb. 2.3 oz.) and significantly cheaper, yet still delivers reliable protection and thoughtful features.
For hard-charging resort skiers or big-mountain freeriders, the Lofoten pants are just about the best money can buy—they’re durable, protective, fully featured, and stunningly high quality. But due to their heft and bulk, we hesitate to recommend them for serious uphill travel.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
In true Arc’teryx fashion, these pants exude quality from hip to toe. The premium 3-layer Gore-Tex construction offers breathable waterproof protection for everything from storm days at the resort to high-octane skin track sessions. But buyer beware: the fit doesn’t work for everyone.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
Appealing to the backcountry crowd, these pants are noticeably lightweight and flexible and have several touring-oriented features, including a low-profile waist belt and a dedicated avy-beacon pocket. But the build quality is a slight step down from premium brands.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
The Lofoten’s greatest strengths are imparted by its robust construction: With category-leading durability and a feature-packed design, it provides steadfast shelter from the elements and is durable enough to last you for years. We do find this pant to be slightly overbuilt, though, with design decisions—including its waist cinch and an extra zipper at the top—that take it down a notch in the comfort department; its heavy-duty construction also makes it less than ideal for the backcountry. If resort-oriented weather protection and staying power are what you seek in a ski pant, though, you’ll find that shelling out (an admittedly high amount of) cash for the Norrøna Lofoten Gore Tex Pro will be worth the expense.
pray for snow
Gear Guide
Best Ski Bibs of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Helmets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Backpacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Gloves of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Mittens of 2026Gear Guide
Best Base Layers of 2026Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026curated for you