The Picture Object Gore-Tex ($370) struck us as an interesting mid-range alternative to big-hitters from Burton, Jones, and 686. Unfortunately, its polarizing fit left our tester perplexed: the shape was too tight in the thighs—a major snowboard pant misstep—and its partial-elastic waistband was loose and lacked adjustability. What's more universal is its balanced warmth and weather protection, which paired well with cold, rowdy weather. But in the end, its poor fit and so-so features make it hard to recommend.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
Best for
Resort
Waterproofing
2-layer Gore-Tex ePE
Insulation
40g polyester
Fabric
Polyester
Pockets
3
Pros
Cons
Picture Object Gore-Tex
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Snowboard Pants.
I'm confident about the storm-worthiness of Picture Object Gore-Tex, but had some fit issues that impacted my overall experience. While I didn't encounter a ton of pow with these on—a consequence of a mild winter—I wore them on some cold days with heavy precip, as well as in wet spring conditions. The durable water-repellent (DWR)-finished 2-layer Gore-Tex fabric, fully taped seams, and coated zippers kept moisture at bay, and I stayed dry regardless of the conditions. Windy resort days rendered similar results, and I never felt any gusts cutting through or draftiness.
The one frustrating part about the Picture Object Gore-Tex's weather protection is the too-tight boot gaiter. I really had to stretch it open to fit over my boot and, overall, had a difficult time putting it on. Because it was so hard to use, it's tempting to disregard it altogether, which makes it easier for snow to get inside. The gaiter also didn't have a boot hook, which I typically like to use to make sure it's always secure and in place. If you can use the boot gaiters securely, these pants should perform well in adverse conditions.
Equipped with 40-gram synthetic polyester insulation, the Object works great as a cold-weather resort pant. I used these on chilly, windy days when it dropped into the 20s, and with only minimal layering underneath, they did a great job keeping me warm. Sitting on heat-sucking chairlifts didn’t bother me, either, and I never felt any chill.
If you're looking for absolute warmth, the 686 Quantum Thermagraph boasts furnace-like 140-gram synthetic insulation, while those typically riding in milder conditions (or who like the flexibility of layering) will find an uninsulated pant like the Patagonia Powder Town a better fit. But for solid heat retention on mid-winter laps—without overdoing the warmth so as to easily overheat—the Object are a nice and versatile option.
While the Object earns solid marks in weather protection and warmth, I didn’t find it very pleasant to wear. Acknowledging that comfort is subjective and often impacted by fit, I personally found these a lot tighter than the baggier snowboard pants I typically like. That honestly wouldn’t have been that big of a deal for me except that the fabric had basically no stretch. I was so squeezed, in fact, that I wouldn’t have been able to wear long underwear if I wanted to, and I felt like my legs were pulling the pants apart while riding. Granted, I have thicker thighs, but even the boot gaiters at the bottom of the pants were too snug.
I also wasn't a fan of the Object’s waistband. Unlike most pants, it’s split into two parts: the top half is elastic, like a base layer, while the bottom half is more traditional and structured, with belt loops. Fit-wise, the waist felt a little loose and saggy, which I didn’t love, especially given how tight the pants were otherwise.
If there's one highlight, it's the tricot lining, which is soft and pleasant to wear. Just note that if you start to get sweaty, it can feel pretty clammy and sticky. Those with smaller thighs or who don’t mind a tighter, skinnier pant may have a better experience than I did, but for me, it missed the mark.
The Object Gore-Tex is a cold-weather resort pant, so don't expect an airy and breathable experience. To test the upper limits of its breathability, I wore these on a warm spring day at June Lake Resort. I wouldn't expect any insulated pants to breathe well in these conditions (it was pushing 60°F), but even on easy resort laps I got noticeably sweaty and overheated, with the tricot lining sticking to my skin. Unzipping the inner thigh vents provided some relief, but despite their respectable length, they only open about an inch and a half wide, which hampers circulation. To be fair, it’d be more manageable on a milder spring day, and the moderately light 40-gram synthetic fill means these won’t overheat as quickly as thicker alternatives. But for true season-long versatility, or if you run warm, an uninsulated shell is a better bet.
The Picture Object Gore-Tex has strong overall construction with its classic Gore-Tex build, but some design choices hamper its build quality. The pants feature a polyester shell fabric that feels thick and strong, along with reinforced scuff guards by the cuffs. After 10 resort days, I came away impressed with the durability. The pants looked like new, and the zippers always worked smoothly.
While the Object felt plenty durable, the handwarmer pockets were small and consistently crammed, which made them feel cheap and poorly thought out. As mentioned above, the gaiters are also tight and hard to pull over the boot. I wouldn't be surprised if they started to wear down from the constant strain. Because of these design missteps, I was never very inspired to wear these pants, even though I knew that they could take a beating.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
PFAS-Free Waterproof Membrane
The membranes used in waterproof products such as rain jackets, ski jackets, and shoes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are valued for their resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product’s waterproof membrane is PFAS-free, while a red X means it contains PFAS.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Repair Services
Repair services extend the lifespan of outdoor gear and reduce overall consumption, though programs vary widely. Some brands offer comprehensive repairs for a range of issues, while others provide limited or no repair support. A green check mark indicates a robust repair program, a yellow check mark indicates limited repair services, and a red X indicates the brand does not offer repair services.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one of the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
Pockets
I'm unfortunately not a big fan of the Object’s pockets. First, it only has three (two handwarmer and one on the left thigh), which is less than what most other snowboard pants offer. Additionally, the hand pockets are especially small, which made it a pain to get multiple things in and out (or just my hands). Thankfully, the thigh pocket (though still small) was a little bigger and also felt secure, so I was never worried about anything falling out while reaching inside on the chairlift. But as a whole, the storage options were a letdown.
Waist Adjustment
Instead of hook-and-loop adjusters that many snowboard pants have, these take a different approach. The waistband features a stretch top half, almost like what you’d find on a base layer, with a more structured bottom half complete with belt loops. Because of that design, I was expecting a comfortable, stretchy feel, but on me it was a looser, insecure fit. Because the belt loops sit low on your waist, it feels awkward to use and almost pointless unless you hike up your pants. Unfortunately, the waistband just didn’t work for me.
Cuffs
The cuffs have gussets that make them easier to fit over your boots, but the boot gaiters were another story: I found them too small and a pain to use. An interesting feature is the drawstring that runs from the hem up the pant leg and into the handwarmer pockets. Pulling the cord lifts the cuff and keeps it from dragging on the floor, but I found it creates a lot of excess material that bunches up inside the small pocket, reducing its already limited size even further.
Tester: 5’5”, 145 lb.
Size tested: Men’s Medium
The sizing of the Picture Object Gore-Tex was awkward on me and felt too loose some areas and too tight in others. I ordered a medium, my normal size, and as someone with thicker legs, I could immediately tell that they felt too restrictive, so much so that I couldn't layer underneath. At the same time, the waist didn't feel secure, and the legs were a little long, which made the pants feel even more uncomfortable. Sizing up would have given me more room in my thighs and butt, but it would have resulted in an even looser waist and longer legs. Everyone has different bodies and preferences, though, and while I had trouble wearing them, if you have thinner legs or prefer a sleeker, streamlined pant, you may find the fit more comfortable.
Burton Cyclic Gore-Tex 2L ($480): Versatility > Warmth
If you're looking for a more versatile pant, the Burton Cyclic Gore-Tex 2L is a good option for $110 more. As an uninsulated shell, it doesn't come with the Object’s warmth, but there's plenty of room to layer underneath when the temps dip. And once spring comes around, the Cyclic's breathability becomes a true highlight, especially compared to the Object. We also found the Cyclic's looser fit more in line with what most snowboarders prefer, and with five pockets, you won't want for storage, either. The Cyclic's lack of insulation and higher price may be a turnoff for some, but we think it’s worth the investment. For more, read our Burton Cyclic Gore-Tex 2L review.
686 Quantum Thermagraph ($310): Improvements in Warmth, Storage, and Fit
While the Object's warmth is impressive in its own right, the 686 Quantum Thermagraph turns the thermostat way up. With it on, you'll easily venture out in temps down to the teens (and potentially lower) with just basic base layers on. Thanks to its baggier fit, if you do need an extra layer, you can add one without feeling squeezed. The Quantum also has twice as many pockets as the Object, which makes it much less of a chore to find storage for all your things. And while both can repel adverse weather well, we give the Quantum, with its better-fitting boot gaiters, the slight edge. Tack on its $60 savings, and the Quantum is the clear winner. For more, read our review of the women's 686 Quantum Geode.
Warmth and weather protection are the Picture Object's best traits, and you can feel confident wearing it in a Nor’easter-type storm. We were let down by its odd fit and polarizing waistband, though, which are among the most polarizing we’ve tested.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
The AK Cyclic is a top choice for resort riders who really get after it, with a burly Gore-Tex construction that’s reliably bombproof. It's also impressively cozy to wear, with a regular fit, above-average breathability, and low weight. Our only real qualm is its relatively steep price for a 2-layer build.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
For absolute warmth, it’s hard to beat the 686 Quantum (women’s Geode). This highly insulated pant is one of your best bets for staying toasty with minimal layering, paired with weatherproofing and durability to match. Though bulky, you won't feel restricted, but you’ll certainly overheat at the first sign of milder temperatures.
Weather Protection
Warmth
Comfort
Breathability
Durability
Sustainability
Answering this question should start with fit: you'll want to make sure the Picture Object Gore-Tex's narrower legs and unique, semi-stretchy waist work with your body shape (it didn’t for our tester). If it passes that first test, the insulated pant has appeal as a protective Gore-Tex model with enough warmth for consistently chilly regions. The price is decent, too. That said, we think there are more compelling options for a similar cost with less polarizing features, such as more storage, larger vents, and a standard waist adjustment system.
Get Outside
Gear Guide
Best Snowboard Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Base Layers of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Helmets of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Ski Backpacks of 2026-2027Gear Guide
Best Ski Bags of 2026Gear Guide
Best Roof Cargo Boxes of 2026