Updated:
Nov 10, 2025The Smith Method MIPS ($160) proves you don’t need to spend a fortune to get a safe, stylish, and comfortable helmet. It includes premium safety tech like MIPS and Smith’s Koroyd material, weighs next to nothing, and has a super-soft liner that belies its price tag. You don’t get a fit adjustment system or a magnetic buckle, but if you find a size that works, this helmet checks a lot of boxes. For light resort laps or backcountry use on a budget, the Method is one of the best values out there.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
14.1 oz.
Construction
In-mold
Vents
8 (fixed)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Smith Method MIPS
For this season's top lids, see our guide to the Best Ski Helmets.
The Smith Method MIPS surprised me with how soft and cozy it felt, even without the premium padding you’d get from more expensive models such as the Smith Vantage 2 ($295) or Smith Level ($250). Its ear pads, forehead liner, and chin strap all have a plush, fleece-like finish, and I never experienced any pressure points or discomfort. The helmet paired well with my Smith goggles, too, which helped everything feel seamless on the hill. It won’t feel as luxurious as those models above or any other (probably heavier) ski helmet that prioritizes comfort, but not every skier needs to feel like their head is wrapped in a pillow all day.
That said, the Smith Method MIPS’s lack of a dial adjustment system limits how precisely you can tune the fit, and is a major concession to the budget price point. There’s an elastic strap in the back that helps a bit, but I couldn’t make micro tweaks mid-day the way I would with a Boa dial or a similar system. I ordered my usual helmet size (medium) and it thankfully fit well out of the box, but this helmet’s comfort will depend a bit more on getting the size just right from the start than if you were to pick a more adjustable model.
At just 14.1 ounces, the Smith Method MIPS is featherlight (it’s actually one of the lightest ski helmet we’ve tested so far) but that low weight comes at the expense of insulation. On a brisk day, with temps in the mid-20s, my ears stayed toasty thanks to the fuzzy ear pads, but the crown of my head felt noticeably chilly. I ended up skiing with my jacket hood over the helmet just to cut the wind—the Method’s always-open vents don’t do it any favors there—and conserve more heat.
Stacked against burlier models like the Giro Ratio or the Level, the Method probably shouldn’t be your first choice if temperatures below about 20 degrees make up the majority of your ski days. I definitely wouldn’t wear it on subzero days without a backup layer like a beanie or a Buff. If you typically run hot or ski during the spring, though, you might appreciate how airy the Method feels.
With eight fixed vents—four in the rear, two in front, and two up top—the Method provides solid airflow for casual resort use. I stayed relatively cool even in spring conditions, and I appreciated the front vents for keeping my goggles from fogging. The layout is simple, and it works well in moderate temps.
Still, I found myself wishing I could close the vents on windier runs. This isn’t a ski helmet for deep winter missions or high-output touring where vent control matters. It’s not in the same class as helmets like the Smith Level or Sweet Protection Switcher, which have admirably customizable venting, but for most inbounds skiing, it does just fine. Just don’t expect your own climate control.
At 14.1 ounces, the Smith Method MIPS is among the lightest ski helmets Better Trail has tested—and I definitely noticed that. I barely felt it on my head, even after a full day of riding. The low weight also made it feel nimble and balanced, with no bobblehead effect or awkward bulk when paired with goggles or a jacket hood.
Compared to even other light helmets like the Pret Cynic X2 (15.8 oz.) or the Poc Obex (1 lb.), the Method stands out. It’s actually lighter than Smith’s own backcountry-focused helmet, the Summit. The stripped-down design helps here—it doesn’t have a dial system or extra features—but if you value weight savings above all else, the Method delivers.
Perhaps the Smith Method MIPS’s biggest drawback is its in-mold construction. While it helps keep the weight down, it doesn’t offer the same protection against dings and dents as a hybrid or ABS shell. The foam brim is particularly vulnerable to damage, and I’d be cautious about stuffing it into a gear bin or tossing it in the back of your car.
That said, the helmet didn’t feel flimsy or fragile during use. It’s perfectly safe to ski with—it just requires a little more care if you want it to last multiple seasons. If you’re tough on your gear, you might want to spend more for a model with a beefier shell.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
MIPS & Koroyd Protection
Given that it costs $160, the fact that the Method contains these two protection technologies is a minor miracle. MIPS has long been the darling of the helmet world for rotational impact protection, and Koroyd—a material proprietary to Smith—adds extra energy absorption along the helmet’s back panels. Both features are rare at this price, and they make the ski helmet feel like a safer, more serious piece of gear.
I tested the Smith Method MIPS in a medium and it fit my 22.5-inch head perfectly. There was no need to adjust anything once I put it on, and it stayed snug throughout the day. The helmet is available in both round and oval fits, which is a great call on Smith’s part—it makes it easier for people with different head shapes to find a comfortable match.
Just keep in mind that with no dial fit system, your fit is essentially set once you pick your size. If you're between sizes or prefer to fine-tune the helmet’s feel, that could be a dealbreaker. Otherwise, if it fits, it sits.
Smith Method Pro MIPS ($185): The No-Brainer Upgrade
If you like the Method’s look and ultralight build but want better adjustability, the Smith Method Pro MIPS is an obvious choice. It adds a dial fit system, upgraded earpads, and a magnetic Fidlock buckle—all while keeping the same 14.1-ounce weight. For $25 more, you get a more refined helmet with the same safety features and style. Unless you’re absolutely squeezing every dollar, we’d recommend most folks go Pro. For more, read our Method Pro MIPS review.
Oakley Mod 1 MIPS ($155): A Feature-Bump but a Comfort Drop
Oakley’s Mod 1 follows a similar recipe as the Smith Method, offering a lightweight in-mold build at a palatable price. Both designs have fixed venting and MIPS liners, but they differ in features: Whereas the Method sticks to the basics (other than its energy-absorbing Koroyd tech), including a non-adjustable fit system and traditional buckle, the Mod 1 goes premium with a Boa fit system and magnetic buckle. That said, we found the thicker-padded Method the more comfortable option and to fit true to size—the Mod 1 runs narrow and is only sparsely cushioned along the interior. To learn more, check out our Mod 1 MIPS review.
Pret Cynic X2 ($160): More Features, Big Logo
At a glance, the Method and Cynic X2 share a lot in common: both have fixed venting, MIPS for safety, and a clean look aimed at resort riders. But the Cynic X2 adds a few key upgrades, including a dial-based fit system for a more secure and customizable feel. The interior isn’t as plush as the Method’s, but it’s still comfortable for all-day wear. It’s also slightly heavier at 15.8 ounces (compared to the Method’s 14.1 oz.), though the difference isn’t very noticeable in use. If you prioritize adjustability and value a more feature-rich build, the Cynic X2 gets the edge for us. That said, the prominent Pret logo on the side of the helmet may not appeal to everyone. For more, read our full review of the Cynic X2.
Light and low profile, the Smith Method bucks the trend of large and bulky entry-level lids. You also get Smith’s premium energy-absorbing Koroyd and a cozy interior, but we missed having a micro-adjustable fit system.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
The Method Pro is light, low profile, and impressively equipped for the price. Its thin in-mold construction will require care to avoid dents and its fixed vents allow air to flow (too) freely, but it's a high-value option for resort and backcountry skiers looking to save.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Blending premium features in a durable shell, the Mod 1 Pro is confidence-inspiring and user-friendly. But its overly stiff ear pads made it challenging to seal out the cold, and the non-adjustable vents impact season-long versatility.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
If you want an affordable ski helmet with modern styling and legitimate safety tech, the Smith Method MIPS should be on your radar. It’s light enough for quick backcountry tours, comfy enough for all-day resort laps, and cheap enough not to make you wince. You’ll miss out on a fine-tuned fit and vent adjustability, but those tradeoffs feel justified at this price. For skiers who want performance without the frills—or the markup—the Method is a smart, streamlined pick.
enter the white room
Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Backpacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Bibs of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Gloves of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Mittens of 2026Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026Gear Guide
Best Base Layers of 2026curated for you