Updated:
Nov 10, 2025The Smith Method Pro MIPS ($185) is a worthy upgrade from the regular Method MIPS, adding a micro-adjustable fit system, a softer-touch liner, and a magnetic chin buckle for just $25 extra. Additional strengths of the design include its low weight and clean styling. As for downsides, these are shared with the standard Method MIPS, namely its lack of adjustable vents (you’ll want a beanie or buff in chilly temps) and less durable construction. Even so, the Method Pro is an attractive option for skiers on a budget who want a lightweight, do-it-all helmet.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
14.1 oz.
Construction
In-mold
Vents
8 (fixed)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Smith Method Pro MIPS
For this season's top lids, see our guide to the Best Ski Helmets.
As a long-time user of the standard Method, I was very happy to see the new Smith Method Pro MIPS has a micro-adjustable fit dial at the back of the helmet. This gives it a significant upgrade in comfort and usability: I’m able to twist the dial on the go, while wearing the helmet, to accommodate whichever hat, buff, or balaclava I’m wearing underneath—or how my hair is braided (yes, that makes a difference in fit, too).
The Method Pro’s interior padding features thin but dense foam in all the right places—forehead, back of the head and neck, and strips of foam protecting the top of your head. It’s not thick and plush like some of Smith’s premium helmets—including our favorite resort lid, the men’s Level / women’s Liberty, which has a fully cushioned interior—but the strategically placed foam does the trick for all-day comfort, and the lining itself is soft and pretty cozy. In addition, the ear pads are thicker at the base and thinner where the main part of your ear sits to eliminate the padding pushing into your ears (a nice feature for people like me who wear a lot of earrings). The ear pads on my Smith Allure, in comparison, don’t have the same contoured fit and my ears end up feeling more squished. Overall, the Smith Method Pro MIPS is a nice upgrade in comfort from my old Method and Allure and has become my new everyday ski helmet.
The Method Pro provides slightly below-average warmth for a ski helmet. The main reason for this is the eight fixed vents, which you can’t close up when it’s cold and windy out. That said, wearing a thicker buff or balaclava underneath helps mitigate the issue. With a hat or buff in place, I’ve used this helmet in a variety of temperatures, from the mid-20s Fahrenheit to the mid-50s, and 95% of the time I haven’t noticed cold air coming in through the vents. If you do run cold, however, or often ski in arctic-like conditions, a ski helmet with adjustable vents (like the Smith Level).
The Smith Method Pro MIPS has eight fixed vents and minimal interior padding in the way to block airflow, giving this helmet solid ventilation. The vents are small—about a quarter inch tall—varying one to two inches in length. There are two vents on the front of the helmet (one on each side); two vents on the back of the helmet (again, one on each side); and two vents stacked on top of each other on either side of the the upper back of the helmet.
I’m not a particularly sweaty person and found I could wear the Method Pro on short hikes to side-country terrain like Nash Gate at Alpental—while I did get warm, I never felt overheated or sweaty. The helmet also features Smith’s “AirEvac ventilation system,” which integrates with Smith goggles to eliminate fog on the lenses (it encourages a chimney-like effect with the goggles). Overall, with only eight vents, the Method Pro is not the best choice for bootpacking while ski mountaineering or other high-output backcountry adventures when you need to wear a helmet while you’re working up a sweat (for that, check out the Smith Summit MIPS, which boasts a whopping 33 vents). But for most resort skiing and casual hike-to-inbounds/backcountry outings, you won’t miss the additional ventilation.
At just 14.1 oz., the Method Pro is one of the lightest resort-oriented ski helmets we’ve tested. It’s so light, in fact, that I barely notice it while I’m skiing, making it super easy to wear. It weighs the same as my other Smith helmet, the Allure, and less than even many backcountry-oriented ultra-ventilated lids, like the Smith Summit MIPS (1 lb.) and the Sweet Protection Ascender MIPS (15.1 oz). The Method Pro owes its light weight to a streamlined feature set and its in-mold construction, in which the exterior shell and interior foam are fused into a single piece (as opposed to a two-piece ABS construction, which is heavier). Though it’s not specifically designed for ski touring, its low weight and low-bulk design means it’s versatile enough for backcountry use.
The Method Pro’s low weight comes at the expense of durability. In-mold construction makes it more susceptible to cosmetic damage than a helmet with a hard plastic (ABS) top like Smith’s Liberty/Level, Vantage, and Nexus. Though my helmet hasn’t suffered any dents so far, my Smith Allure, which features the same in-mold construction, has racked up some dents over the last season or two just from being dropped in the parking lot and rolling around in the car—but nothing that’s affected the helmet’s fit or performance.
Considering that the Smith Method Pro MIPS is on the cheaper end of the price spectrum, a bit of cosmetic damage might be worth the savings. But we do recommend taking care to avoid drops as a hard impact can compromise the foam underneath the Method’s thin shell. In addition, the rim of the helmet is only lightly reinforced, leaving quite a bit of the foam exposed. Extra care here is also advised to extend the helmet’s life.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
MIPS Liner
MIPS (Multi-directional Impact Protection System) has been quickly adopted in the ski helmet market. The system consists of a plastic layer inside the helmet—sandwiched between the shell and the liner—that moves separately from your head in a fall, reducing rotational forces on the brain in an angled impact. In the Method Pro, the liner is partially exposed due to the minimalist padding, but never caused us any noticeable discomfort.
Koroyd
Koroyd is another safety feature that’s found on many mid-range and high-end Smith helmets. The honeycomb design is made of a series of small tubes bonded together that fit between the hard plastic shell and foam interior. The tubes crumple on impact, absorbing energy while allowing air to flow through the straw-like openings. Whereas some Smith helmets are fully wrapped in Koroyd (like the top-end Nexus) the more budget-oriented Method Pro features a smaller strip of Koroyd near the vents at the back/sides of the helmet.
Smith ski helmets consistently fit my round-shaped head well, and I found that to be true with the Method Pro. The unisex Method Pro is available in four sizes, and my size medium lid fits me perfectly (I land in the middle of the size range and I never maxed out the dial fit system). It’s worth calling out that the Method Pro is made in two shapes, which is pretty uncommon at this price point. I tested the standard Method Pro, while there’s also a Round Contour Fit for rounder head shapes.
Smith Method MIPS ($160): Same Safety, Fewer Frills
The standard Method shares the same clean aesthetic and MIPS safety tech as the Method Pro but ditches the premium touches to save you $25. You lose the dial fit system, magnetic Fidlock buckle, and upgraded earpads, but the helmet still weighs just 14.1 ounces and offers a secure enough fit for many heads right out of the box. If you don’t need the bells and whistles and want to keep things light, simple, and stylish, the Method MIPS gets the job done for less. For more, read our Smith Method MIPS review.
Oakley Mod 3 MIPS ($185): Light and Airy
Oakley’s Mod 3 follows a similar recipe as the Smith Method, offering a lightweight in-mold build at a palatable price. Both designs have MIPS liners, and their feature sets line up closely with adjustable fit systems (Oakley’s Boa system is a bit lower-profile and smoother) and magnetic buckles. The Mod 3 tacks on adjustable venting, although the adjuster proved to be sticky and a bit of a pain to operate. In addition, we found the more densely-padded Method Pro the more comfortable option and to fit true to size—the Oakley runs narrow and is only sparsely cushioned along the interior. As such, we prefer the better-built and comfier Smith. To learn more, check out our Mod 3 MIPS review.
Glade Boundary MIPS ($199): Feature Upgrade, Comfort Downgrade
For another $34, Glade’s Boundary offers an intriguing upgrade to the Method Pro. Most notably, the Boundary has significantly more vents—16 total—and 10 of the openings are adjustable. This makes the helmet more versatile for times when you want to really dump heat, as well as if you want to seal in warmth on a chilly and less active day. The vents thankfully don’t add much weight, and the Boundary is still serviceable for touring at under 1 pound. That said, we found the interior foam to be lower quality on the Boundary, its ear pads to be too small, and its in-mold construction is no more durable than the Method Pros. Unless you want the adjustable vents, we think it’s worth saving with the Smith Method Pro. For more, read our review of the Glade Boundary.
The Method Pro is light, low profile, and impressively equipped for the price. Its thin in-mold construction will require care to avoid dents and its fixed vents allow air to flow (too) freely, but it's a high-value option for resort and backcountry skiers looking to save.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Light and low profile, the Smith Method bucks the trend of large and bulky entry-level lids. You also get Smith’s premium energy-absorbing Koroyd and a cozy interior, but we missed having a micro-adjustable fit system.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
The versatile Oakley is a standout value for mixed resort and backcountry use, with high-quality parts, adjustable ventilation, and a low weight. While thin padding along the interior and a sticky vent adjuster dimmed our enthusiasm, the Mod 3 is great all-rounder for those who prioritize a light and airy feel.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
High-quality ski helmets can get expensive in a hurry, with many of the most popular options running north of $200. The Smith Method Pro appeals to the skier who wants a reliable, lightweight helmet that’ll work at the resort and/or on backcountry tours without breaking the bank. Sure, it lacks some of the premium features of more expensive helmets—you’ll have to wear a balaclava or buff on cold days and the thinner shell will require some extra care—but it’s a thoughtfully built option for skiers looking to save.
enter the white room
Gear Guide
Best Ski Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Pants of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Boots of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Backpacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Bibs of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Gloves of 2026Gear Guide
Best Ski Mittens of 2026Gear Guide
Best Midlayers of 2026Gear Guide
Best Base Layers of 2026curated for you