Get Better Trail in your inbox.

Subscribe here.
MENU

The North Face Base Camp Duffel: A Multi-Year Review

ByMultiple Authors
Dec 11, 2025
When you buy through our links, we may receive a commission.
Our Take:
4.7/5
Editors' Pick

As we’ve learned over years of testing, The North Face Base Camp ($149) is a truly expedition-ready duffel: It’s ultra burly, rigid, and built to withstand years of abuse. There are tradeoffs to its rugged construction, notably that it’s hard to open and pack, and it’s more bag than most travelers actually need. But for bold itineraries and rough travel, it’s the kind of duffel that carries well and keeps your gear protected even if it takes a tumble.

Organization

Organization

3.5/5
Durability

Durability

5/5
Water Resistance

Water Resistance

4/5
Carrying Comfort

Carrying Comfort

4.5/5
Weight & Packability

Weight & Packability

3/5
Sustainability

Sustainability

3.9/5

Capacities

31, 50, 71, 95, 132, 150L

Carry Straps

Backpack

Weight

3 lb. 9.1 oz.

Fabric(s)

1,000D polyester, 840D nylon bottom

Waterproof

No

Pros

A true tank of a duffel that is ideal for far-flung adventures.
Ergonomic backpack straps provide a comfortable carry without awkward pressure points.
Spacious external pocket for storing dirty gear or things you want quick access to.
Comes in six different sizes.

Cons

Cylindrical shape requires slightly more precision when packing than rectangular models.
No shoulder strap for medium-distance carries.

For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Duffel Bags.

At 71 liters, the medium-size North Face Base Camp offers a good middle ground between smaller, weekend-sized bags in the 50- to 60-liter range and 100-liter behemoths that are overkill for anything other than a remote expedition. Packing it full isn’t completely straightforward, though. Its U-shaped lid opens wide, but the stiff materials require real force to pull the zipper around—especially when the bag is full. Its cylindrical shape also means rectangular packing cubes don’t use the space perfectly; I usually fill the gaps with jackets or softer items.


The exterior end pocket is one of the most useful features, with enough room for shoes or dirty gear I don’t want mingling with clean clothes. Under the lid, a full-size mesh pocket holds smaller accessories—headlamps, socks, gaiters—but anything rigid makes the lid harder to close. Inside the main compartment, there’s an elastic-top mesh sleeve that I rarely touch, though it was perfect for storing socks and underwear on Kilimanjaro when I ditched packing cubes to save weight.


Daisy chains line both long sides, a key clip sits inside the lid pocket, and four vertical compression straps help you control bulk when The North Face Base Camp isn’t completely full. This bag’s layout feels streamlined and intentional, but the stiff fabrics—so helpful for durability—mean it’s simply harder to pack than more flexible duffels like the Patagonia Black Hole, Cotopaxi Allpa, REI Co-op Big Haul, or Thule Chasm.

This is easily the most durable duffel I’ve ever used. The Base Camp’s PVC-coated, 1,000-denier nylon body feels almost like the exterior of a flexible rain boot, and the 840-denier ballistic nylon base reinforces the area that sees the most action. Even in a gear category that prizes long-lasting construction, those materials stand out as particularly rugged. The Black Hole, for example, is made with 900-denier polyester with TPU laminate, while the Allpa Getaway is 840-denier nylon all over.


Every buckle, stitch, and zipper feels overbuilt, in a good way. After years of travel—including international moves, winter expeditions in northern Norway, and dozens of airport check-ins—the only signs of wear on my bag are superficial scuffs. Double stitching and bar tacks reinforce the handle attachments and other stress points, and I’ve never worried about the fabric failing. Compared to pretty much every duffel bag on the market, the Base Camp is simply built to best handle whatever abuse is dished out. It’s the bag I trust most when I know conditions will be rough.

With its PVC-coated shell and DWR-treated ballistic nylon base, The North Face Base Camp shrugs off rain, snow, and general moisture remarkably well. The lid and end-pocket zippers both have storm flaps, and during trips in the Lofoten Islands and up Kilimanjaro, everything inside stayed dry despite brief precipitation. It’s not a waterproof duffel, like the Osprey Transporter or Yeti Panga, but it’s more water-resistant than the Black Hole thanks to its thicker shell. Against other coated, non-waterproof duffel bags like the Allpa, I’d give it a slight edge as well. It can’t compete with fully submersible IPX-rated bags, but for most adventure travel, the Base Camp’s weatherproofing is more than enough.

The North Face Base Camp has been one of my go-to adventure duffels for years, and I’ve carried it on trips across Colorado, Europe, and even on a Kilimanjaro climb. This bag has always felt more comfortable than its build and reputation would suggest. Even when I’m hauling 40 to 50 pounds, the rounded shape and thick, structured fabric help it sit close to my body rather than sag or torque awkwardly. And the Base Camp’s removable backpack straps help manage the load quite well. Their ergonomic curve and firm-but-not-stiff padding keep them from digging into my shoulders, and the duffel rides high and tight against my back.


The top handles are fine, if unremarkable; the padded hook-and-loop wrap keeps them together and makes quick carries tolerable. Overall, I prefer the Base Camp’s structured feel over the Patagonia Black Hole (which tends to sag more), and find its carry comfort comparable to the more crossover-inspired Cotopaxi Allpa Getaway. If you’re on a trip that requires you to carry a hefty load of gear over any distance greater than from the terminal to a taxi, the Base Camp is one of the best options out there.

At 3 pounds, 9.1 ounces, the Base Camp sits firmly on the heavier end of the duffel bag spectrum. The Chasm is slightly heavier (3 lb. 14.4 oz.), while the Allpa Getaway (2 lb. 7 oz.) is lighter—but neither matches the Base Camp’s combination of structure, comfort, and durability. This bag’s weight feels more than justified, especially because it carries well when loaded.


The Base Camp packs into a circular mesh pouch measuring roughly 15 by 15 inches. The pouch works fine for storage inside another duffel, but it’s not a great dual-purpose cube like the Nemo Big Haul’s or REI Roadtripper’s. And because its materials are so stiff, the duffel doesn’t compress much when underfilled and won’t pass for a carry-on. Still, for such a bombproof build, the weight and pack size feel reasonable.

Select icon to view details:

Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon
Icon

Longevity

Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.

Patagonia Black Hole Duffel 70L ($199): Trade Durability For Packing Ease
Despite costing $50 more, the Black Hole doesn’t quite match the Base Camp’s tough-as-nails construction. But with a 900-denier, TPU-coated polyester ripstop shell and a 200-denier, PU-treated polyester liner, it’s still sturdier than many other duffels. The Black Hole’s fabrics aren’t as rigid as the Base Camp’s, making it easier to wrangle when you’re loading up, and its rectangular shape also works better with packing cubes than the Base Camp’s cylinder. Both duffels feature mesh pockets under the lid (one on the Base Camp versus two on the Black Hole) and an exterior pocket—the Base Camp’s is roomy enough for a pair of shoes, while the Black Hole’s includes an interior zipper for access from either side. Each has removable backpack straps, top carry handles, and haul handles on both ends. If the slight dip in packing convenience isn’t a dealbreaker, we think the Base Camp is the better value. For more, check out our review of the Black Hole Duffel.


Thule Chasm 70L Duffel ($180): Fill ’er Up
The Chasm features an extra-wide lid, making it ideal for travelers packing awkward or bulky items. Its flat bottom also makes it easier to load in packing cubes without wasting space, a common issue with the Base Camp. Other perks include three internal mesh pockets and, like the Base Camp, an exterior pocket at one end large enough to fit a pair of shoes. Both duffels have removable backpack straps and top carry handles, but only the Chasm includes small straps to keep the handles flush against its sides, while the Base Camp adds a water-resistant ID window and an extra mesh sleeve inside. The main difference, though, lies in their construction. The Chasm’s 900-denier polyester is no slouch, but the Base Camp’s shell is a cut above. For far-flung expeditions where durability is paramount, we recommend the Base Camp. For lighter adventures, the Chasm offers an easier packing experience. For more, read our Chasm Duffel review.

The North Face Base Camp M ($160)
Holding up The North Face Base Camp Duffel M
4.7/5

The Base Camp is built to handle virtually anything you (and nature) throw at it, and after years of testing around the globe, we can confirm its durability. Though its packability suffers a bit from its thick and rigid exterior, it’ll keep your gear safe—even if it happens to tumble down a mountain.

Capacities
31, 50, 71, 95, 132, 150L
Carry Straps
Backpack
Weight
3 lb. 9.1 oz.
Fabric(s)
1,000D polyester, 840D nylon bottom
Waterproof
No
Icon

Organization

3.5/5
Icon

Durability

5/5
Icon

Water Resistance

4/5
Icon

Carrying Comfort

4.5/5
Icon

Weight & Packability

3/5
Icon

Sustainability

3.9/5
Patagonia Black Hole 70L ($199)
Patagonia Black Hole duffel packed and ready for horse packers
4.8/5

The Black Hole is a rugged, weather-resistant duffel built for hauling heavy loads on backcountry expeditions and extended travel. Though pricier and less structured than some competitors, its durable build, roomy design, and comfortable backpack carry make it one of the best large-capacity duffels available.

Capacities
40, 55, 70, 100L
Carry Straps
Backpack
Weight
3 lb. 11.6 oz.
Fabric(s)
900D polyester, TPU laminate
Waterproof
No
Icon

Organization

3.5/5
Icon

Durability

4.5/5
Icon

Water Resistance

4/5
Icon

Carrying Comfort

4.5/5
Icon

Weight & Packability

3.5/5
Icon

Sustainability

5/5
Thule Chasm 70L ($180)
Carrying Thule Chasm 70L duffel bag at airport
4.5/5

The Chasm gets a lot right, from its comfortable carry and sturdy construction to its easy-to-pack main compartment. However, we wish its compression straps and haul handles offered the same level of support and usability.

Capacities
40, 70, 90, 130L
Carry Straps
Backpack
Weight
3 lb. 14.4 oz.
Fabric(s)
900D polyester
Waterproof
No
Icon

Organization

4/5
Icon

Durability

4/5
Icon

Water Resistance

3/5
Icon

Carrying Comfort

4/5
Icon

Weight & Packability

3/5
Icon

Sustainability

3.4/5

Is the Base Camp Duffel for You?

If you want a duffel that borders on indestructible and can handle demanding expeditions and years upon years of use, we think that The North Face Base Camp is one of the best options available. Its stiffness makes it harder to pack compared to less burly competitors, and the cylindrical shape isn’t ideal for organization. It’s also overkill for casual travel. But those concerns should fall by the wayside when you’re headed out on big, ambitious adventures where failure isn’t an option, which is where the Base Camp more than earns its keep.