The North Face Router ($159) is one of the most comfortable travel packs we’ve tested, especially for its price, and its classic backpack design makes it a versatile choice for spontaneous adventures. It feels less bulky than most 40-liter bags and can pass as a large daypack with ease. Its ventilation is poor, though, its fabrics are thin for this category, and the top-loading layout can be annoying if it’s your main storage option.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
Capacities
40L
Fabric(s)
210D nylon (300D in heather colorway)
Hipbelt
Yes
Laptop Sleeve
Yes (17 in.)
Exterior Pockets
5
Weight
2 lb. 15 oz.
Pros
Cons
The North Face Router
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Travel Backpacks.
What you see is what you get with The North Face Router, and that’s a good thing. This bag looks like a hiking daypack writ large, and its dialed harness makes for superb carrying comfort. I took the Router on two steep hikes—a 5-miler near June Lake in the California Sierra and a 6.5-mile jaunt in the Simi Hills—and each time I loaded it with roughly 25 pounds of camera and hiking gear. On both outings, as well as during its use as an airport bag and a road trip companion, the Router felt supportive and comfortable in a way that more luggage-like travel packs don’t.
A big part of this pack’s accommodating feel comes from how well the shoulder straps and backpanel fit and move with your body. The North Face Router’s yoke is articulated and has a bit of separation from the backpanel, which gives the straps more freedom to move without rubbing or limiting your arms and shoulders. The backpanel uses a segmented, multi-panel design that matches the curve of your back instead of pressing in like a single flat slab. Plus, the Router’s sternum strap can be adjusted up or down, allowing me to dial in the height, and even though the hipbelt isn’t padded, it still helped take the edge off heavier loads.
Ventilation is the Router’s weak spot. There are small channels in the backpanel, but sweat still showed up fast—even when I was walking through an air-conditioned airport with a heavy load, and even during short city walks while carrying just 10 pounds. The Router can carry weight better than most, but it won’t keep your back dry while doing it. If you need something even more robust in the support department, check out the Osprey Farpoint, which has a full suspension that includes a perimeter frame and a framesheet. For better ventilation, take a look at the Cotopaxi Allpa.
The Router’s layout is practical, and it hits all my baseline requirements for a functional travel pack: a usable dorsal pocket, a handy top pocket, a laptop compartment that’s easy to access, and two water bottle sleeves. As you might expect with the daypack-inspired design, its main compartment is top-loading (no clamshell here), with a U-shaped zipper. The design was totally fine when I was on the trail (I just kept items I might want quick access to, like a windlayer or larger snacks, towards the top), but it’s less convenient when I’m living out of the bag and need something buried at the bottom.
Pocket-wise, the Router gives you a lot of grab-and-go options. The dorsal pocket opens wide and has two mesh sleeves that help keep small items from pooling at the bottom. Above it is a fleece-lined pocket meant for sunglasses or anything scratch-prone. Both compartments are great at organizing their contents, but the fleece one’s zipper placement feels a bit awkward. It’s at the bottom of the pocket, and it took me a minute to get used to how you access it.
The North Face Router also has an admin pocket with plenty of sleeves for small stuff, plus a key clip. The laptop compartment sits near the back and is also top-loading, which I prefer for access in tight spaces like airplane seats. It fits machines up to 17 inches, and its internal dividers also work for a tablet and other flat electronics. The two water bottle sleeves are stretchy and handle bigger bottles, and the side compression straps can help lock taller bottles in place, though slimmer bottles don’t always sit as snugly as I’d like.
The Router held up better in practice than its specs suggest, but it’s still not a pack I’d choose for extended travel in rugged terrain, where luggage integrity is critical. The 210-denier ripstop nylon is one of the thinnest materials from a mainstream manufacturer that I’ve seen in a travel backpack, and it falls well short of other models that are themselves below average in this category. More specifically, the REI Co-op Ruckpack 30 (which is an even cheaper pack, at $109) has 400-denier polyester material, and the Farpoint is made with 450-denier polyester. Many of the travel backpacks that we've tested have skins even thicker than that, with deniers from 600 all the way up to the Aer Travel Pack 3’s impressive 1,680-denier armor.
It’s worth noting that despite its comparatively gauzy material, the Router has held up well so far. I pushed it through brush and chaparral on the Simi Hills hike without tears or snags—just scuffs that washed right off, and it handled all of my flights, coffee shop sessions, and everything else with aplomb. If your travel style is mostly urban with the occasional foray into the woods, I think it’ll last just fine. If you’re hard on gear or want something that feels truly rugged for years of rough handling, the Router doesn’t have a build that inspires a lot of confidence for the long term.
Weather protection on The North Face Router is below average. It relies on a durable water-repellent finish, and it doesn’t have a rain cover (like the Ruckpack) or a TPU or PU coating, as do competitors such as the Patagonia Black Hole. During a light drizzle in New York City, everything inside stayed dry, but I wouldn’t count on that outcome in steady rain, especially given how thin the fabric feels.
For frequent wet-weather travel, I’d rather bring something with a more protective barrier. Many of the TPU-coated travel backpacks that Better Trail has tested, like the Cotopaxi Allpa or the Black Hole, will suffice. The Router can handle brief exposure, but that’s it.
The Router is fairly light (2 lb. 15 oz.) for how supportive it feels, and it avoids the oversized, blocky vibe that a lot of 40-liter travel backpacks end up with. Between its compression straps and the daypack shape, it carries smaller than its volume suggests.
It’s still a big bag for under-seat use, though. I was able to cram it under the seat when flying from LAX to JFK, but it took up most of my foot room. Overhead bin use is straightforward, and the Router lies fairly flat when it’s not loaded to the max, which helps it feel more manageable.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Repair Services
Repair services extend the lifespan of outdoor gear and reduce overall consumption, though programs vary widely. Some brands offer comprehensive repairs for a range of issues, while others provide limited or no repair support. A green check mark indicates a robust repair program, a yellow check mark indicates limited repair services, and a red X indicates the brand does not offer repair services.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
The Router only comes in one capacity, and on my 5-foot-10, 185-pound frame, it fits exceptionally well. The shoulder straps settle naturally, the entire pack moves with me instead of fighting my posture, and it never feels lopsided. The hipbelt isn’t cushy, but it helps with stability, and the overall shape stays close enough to my back that it doesn't feel unwieldy.
If you want an even more dialed fit across a wider range of body types, the Osprey Farpoint has an edge due to its adjustable torso length. But for a simple one-size-fits-all travel pack, the Router does a fine job.
Osprey Farpoint 40 ($185): Even Better on the Trail
If you want a pack that can handle even heavier hauls and longer hikes while still remaining comfortable, then you’ll want to set your sights on the Farpoint 40. For $26 more, it adds a padded hipbelt, an internal frame, and adjustable shoulder straps to more evenly distribute weight and carry loads the Router would struggle with. The Farpoint also boasts a ridged foam backpanel to better promote airflow. Its organization, however, isn’t as comprehensive—the biggest miss is the lack of a dedicated water bottle pocket. And while the Farpoint is a more durable pack, it's also noticeably bigger and bulkier, which may be overkill if you prefer a compact silhouette for grab-and-go days. Still, if you like to bring everything and the kitchen sink when you travel, the Farpoint is up to the task. For more, read our Farpoint 40 Travel Pack review.
Patagonia Black Hole Pack 32L ($169): Lighter and More Durable—With a Catch
If you’re not convinced by the Router’s subpar durability, the Black Hole offers thicker fabrics (TPU-coated, 300D polyester, as well as a 200D lining) while weighing a pound less. It doesn’t offer the same amount of carry comfort, though. The Router features a significantly more robust harness to better distribute weight and make heavy hauls far more manageable. When packing, both packs share a similar organizational layout: a top-loading main compartment, a flat front pocket, a top pocket (though the Black Hole’s lacks an admin panel), a separate laptop sleeve, and dual water bottle pockets. The Black Hole misses out on the Router’s fleece-lined pocket, but it adds a flat mesh pocket inside the main compartment for small items like a passport. Still, the Black Hole leaves much to be desired when it’s actually on your back. You can save a few bucks by sticking with the Router—just treat it gently.
The Router is one of the most comfortable packs we’ve tested, even when it’s stuffed full. It also offers ample organization and trims the bulk found in many packs with similar capacities, but we aren’t huge fans of its lackluster breathability and thin construction.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
With its robust harness and internal frame, the Farpoint carries loads and covers distances most competitors can’t match. But while it excels in comfort, this pack’s organization falls short, and its build quality is merely average.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
The spacious Black Hole MLC melds the capacity of a duffel with the convenience and comfort of a travel pack. Its roomy design and well-built carry system let you haul your stuff for sizable distances without discomfort. That said, we wish it had a dedicated water bottle pocket, and its size may feel bulky to travelers with smaller loads.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
If you want a travel pack that can carry enough stuff for a long weekend but looks and feels like an oversized daypack, The North Face Router is easy to recommend. It fits well, the harness is legitimately supportive, and the pocket layout checks most of the boxes we care about. You’ll have to treat it a bit more gently than other travel packs if you want it to last, and its top-loading design might not be for everybody, but the money you’ll save over more expensive options might seal the deal.
gear up and go
Gear Guide
Best Duffel Bags of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Camping Tents of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Backpacking Sleeping Bags of 2026