The Osprey Farpoint 40 ($200) is the most comfortable travel pack we’ve tested, full stop. Its internal frame, adjustable torso length, hipbelt, and load lifters make it feel more like a hiking pack than just a suitcase with straps. This bag isn’t perfect, though: Its organization is minimal for a travel bag, and durability and weather resistance are merely adequate. If comfort while you’re schlepping gear long distances on the road is a top concern, though, look no further.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
Capacities
40L (50, 75L)
Fabric(s)
450D polyester
Hipbelt
Yes
Laptop Sleeve
Yes (16 in.)
Exterior Pockets
4
Weight
3 lb. 6.4 oz.
Pros
Cons
Osprey Farpoint 40
For this season's top models, see our guide to the Best Travel Backpacks.
You’ll notice how much the Osprey Farpoint 40’s carry stands out from other travel packs as soon as you put it on. My first thought was basically, “Wow, this hugs my body really well”—praise usually reserved for backpacking packs. Instead of just hanging off my shoulders as a lot of travel packs do, it settled in close and distributed weight across my hips and back in a way that felt unusually natural for a 40-liter bag. Even before I started walking, the fit felt perfectly tuned, not generic.
The major reason for that feel is the Farpoint’s impressive suspension. This system is the real deal: It has a metal perimeter frame as well as a framesheet, complemented by padded shoulder straps and a hipbelt with wide foam wings. The Farpoint even has load lifters at the top of the yoke, letting you fine-tune how the load rests on your back. Given that Osprey is one of the leading packmakers in the backpacking space, perhaps this shouldn’t come as a huge surprise.
In practice, the suspension proved exemplary. For testing purposes, I carried about 30 pounds in the Farpoint on a 4-mile hike in the Sierra Nevada, and then did another 5-mile outing in the Rockies. I didn’t get the usual shoulder bite or nagging back pressure that most travel packs suffer from. Ventilation was also excellent for the amount of weight I was hauling. There are other models in this category that allow you to comfortably undertake hefty loads, such as the Cotopaxi Allpa and The North Face Router. But no travel pack puts it all together like the Osprey Farpoint 40, which you can rely on to get you to anywhere from your international destination to the trailhead, and then far beyond it.
The Farpoint’s organization is simple and mostly effective, but it doesn’t feel as optimized as the carry system. The main compartment has a clamshell opening with the hinge on the bottom, which I generally like for packing since it grants unfettered access to the entire storage space. Inside the lid, there’s a large mesh pocket that works well for slim items, toiletries, and the kind of small gear you want visible instead of buried.
Externally, the best feature is the dorsal shove-it pocket. I used it for quick-access stuff like a rain jacket and snacks, and it’s genuinely convenient when you don’t want to unzip the whole pack. There’s also a small zippered top pocket that’s perfect for wallet and passport duty, and the hipbelt has a little elastic pocket on the left side, which is handy.
The downsides are the ones you feel when you use the Farpoint every day. First: no water bottle pocket. I reach for a bottle constantly when I’m moving through airports or walking around a city, so this omission was the most persistent irritation. The laptop sleeve is also a mixed bag. It’s separate from the main compartment, which I appreciate, but it’s accessed via a side zipper, and the protection is only modest—just a bit of padding, and no dividers or extras. It works, but it’s not the most confidence-inspiring setup I’ve used.
I also really missed a luggage pass-through strap. This is a feature that makes life easier when you’re stacking a travel backpack on a roller bag, and it feels like an easy design choice that Osprey just chose not to take. All in all, you probably won’t rue the Farpoint’s pocket layout, but it could be more fully featured.
The craftsmanship on the Osprey Farpoint 40 is high, and everything feels solid—the zippers are chunky, the stitching looks clean, and the frame adds a confidence-inspiring backbone. During day-to-day handling, nothing about it felt fragile. I hiked with this pack a few times, carried it around Denver for a day, and also flew with it as a carry-on. Through all that, I didn’t see any durability red flags. If you’re not chucking it onto rocks or strapping it to the roof of a car, it should hold up for a long while.
However, the Farpoint’s 450-denier polyester is fairly thin compared to competitors of this build quality and around this price point. The Cotopaxi Allpa’s TPU-coated 840-denier shell feels more rugged and abrasion-resistant, and the Thule Aion is built with 600-denier waxed polyester. (At the top of the heap, you have the Aer Travel Pack 3 and the Topo Designs Global, each of which boasts nylon that’s 1000D or higher.) Those models can take more rough-and-tumble use than the Farpoint can handle, and so if your trips look more outdoorsy than urban, you might want to opt for a pack that you can use and abuse to an even higher degree.
The Osprey Farpoint 40’s weather resistance is competent, but nothing special. Its fabric has a durable water-repellent (DWR) finish, and that’s basically the whole story—no TPU coating, no special liner, and no rain cover. For quick storms and short walks between transit and shelter, it should do the job, though. I used it mostly in sunny conditions, but I did get caught in a brief downpour in Denver, and everything stayed dry inside.
I’d be more cautious in sustained wet weather. A DWR-only approach can hold up for a while, but it eventually gets overwhelmed. Packs with stronger weather strategies are simply more reassuring: The Black Hole’s TPU laminate tends to shrug off water longer, and the REI Co-op Ruckpack’s waterproof rain cover is the best solution when conditions really turn. So yes, the Farpoint can handle a brief hit of weather, but it’s not the pack I’d pick if my trip might involve extended rain.
The Farpoint sits in the middle of the travel pack weight spectrum. It checks in at 3 pounds, 8 ounces, but considering the frame, adjustable harness, load lifters, and generally robust suspension, that’s actually pretty good. I’ve tested heavier travel backpacks with noticeably worse carry systems (hello, Amazon Basics Travel Pack), and that’s where weight feels pointless. Here, all that heft is in service of high performance.
That said, the Farpoint is certainly a bulky pack. It’s one of the larger bags I’ve used in this category, and the internal frame and stiff backpanel mean it doesn’t compress down nicely. Even when empty, it takes up a lot of physical space, and it’s not a pack I’d want to stash inside other luggage. In flight scenarios, it works well as a carry-on and feels purpose-built for the overhead bin. But it’s not remotely realistic as a personal item, even if you underpack it. This is a bag you commit to carrying as your main piece of luggage, and its size and rigidity reinforce that.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear and keeping it in use for longer is one of the best ways to reduce environmental impact. Our proprietary longevity rating assesses factors like overall build quality, materials, fabric denier, component durability, and real-world performance. A green check indicates that we expect the product to be long-lasting relative to its peers, a yellow check mark indicates average longevity, and a red X indicates a product that may have a limited lifespan.
Recycled Materials
Recycled materials are prevalent in outdoor gear, with nylon, polyester, wool, and down among the most common, but the composition varies widely. A green check mark indicates the product is made with a substantial amount of recycled materials (100% recycled or the core fabric that makes up most of the product is recycled), a yellow check means it contains a moderate to small amount of recycled materials, while a red X means there are no recycled materials in the product.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile management system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A green check mark indicates a product is either a Bluesign Product (contains at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and 20-30% Bluesign-approved accessories) or features a significant amount of Bluesign-approved materials. A yellow check mark means it uses some Bluesign-approved materials but less than the aforementioned category, and a red X means there are no Bluesign-approved materials in the product.
PFAS-Free DWR
Durable water-repellent (DWR) finishes can contain PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). These highly persistent “forever chemicals” are used in outdoor gear for their strong resistance to water, oil, and heat, but are linked to environmental contamination and a range of health concerns. A green check mark indicates the product uses a PFAS-free DWR, while a red X means the DWR contains PFAS.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates a brand’s commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing environmental impact through certifications and programs like Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production (WRAP), and the Fair Labor Association, while also recognizing brands that manufacture primarily in the U.S. or Europe under strict labor and environmental regulations. A green check mark indicates a brand meets our responsible manufacturing criteria, while a red X means it does not.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
Packaging can add significant waste to outdoor gear purchases, so many brands work to reduce its impact by using recycled materials, incorporating Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, and minimizing plastic and paper use. A green check mark indicates a brand uses recycled or reduced materials across all of its packaging, a yellow check indicates moderate or limited use of recycled or reduced packaging, and a red X indicates the brand does not make either of these efforts.
Repair Services
Repair services extend the lifespan of outdoor gear and reduce overall consumption, though programs vary widely. Some brands offer comprehensive repairs for a range of issues, while others provide limited or no repair support. A green check mark indicates a robust repair program, a yellow check mark indicates limited repair services, and a red X indicates the brand does not offer repair services.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
Resale and recycling programs help keep outdoor gear in circulation longer and out of landfills, ranging from trade-in resale platforms that offer store credit to take-back initiatives that recycle products at the end of their usable life. A green check mark indicates a brand offers both resale and recycling programs, a yellow check mark indicates it offers one or the two, and a red X indicates it offers neither.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether a brand measures, reports, and works to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions using established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. A green check mark indicates a brand publicly reports greenhouse gas emissions data, sets clearly defined reduction targets, and uses established tracking frameworks such as Higg or The Change Climate Project. A yellow check mark indicates the brand tracks emissions and outlines reduction goals but provides limited data, lacks science-based verification, or does not clearly report progress. A red X indicates the brand does not appear to track greenhouse gas emissions or provides so little information that its efforts cannot be verified.
Annual Impact Report
Annual impact reports provide transparency and accountability by outlining a brand’s sustainability efforts across areas such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas emissions, waste, water use, supply chains, and packaging. A green check mark indicates a brand publishes a detailed, brand-specific impact report that closely aligns with our sustainability criteria and leaves little room for ambiguity. A yellow check indicates a brand provides some relevant sustainability reporting but lacks detail in key areas or is covered only briefly within a parent company report. A red X indicates a brand does not regularly publish an impact report.
I tested the Osprey Farpoint 40, but Osprey also makes 50- and 75-liter versions. Notably, the brand also sells the pack in a women’s fit, the Fairview 40, making it the only travel pack Better Trail has tested so far with that option. On my 5-foot-10, 185-pound frame, the fit of my pack was excellent, with major credit going to the Farpoint’s adjustable torso length (another rarity).
I was able to position the shoulder straps and hipbelt exactly where they needed to be, which meant the pack hugged close without the hipbelt sitting too high or the straps pulling weirdly. Fit consistency across multiple body types is a big win, and the adjustable torso gives the Farpoint a built-in advantage.
The North Face Router ($159): Slimmer, but Less Comfortable
The North Face Router is another 40-liter backpack, but it takes up about 15 percent less space than the Farpoint and weighs more than half a pound less. It also takes a different approach to organization: Instead of a clamshell opening, the Router has a top-loading design and replaces the shove-it pocket with a traditional zippered dorsal pocket. While both packs include a laptop sleeve and a small top pocket, only the Router adds a fleece-lined pocket for delicate items and two water bottle sleeves on either side. On your back, the Router’s articulated shoulder straps and rounded backpanel offer one of the most comfortable carries we tested—second only to the Farpoint, which is the runaway winner. Its 210-denier recycled ripstop nylon also isn’t as tough. If you’re the type of traveler who prioritizes carrying your gear comfortably over long distances, the Farpoint deserves a space in your closet. For more, read our review of the Router Backpack.
Cotopaxi Allpa 35L ($225): A Stronger, Better Organized Option
If the Router still sounds too bulky, consider the Allpa. It retains a padded hipbelt but sports an even more pared-down profile. Even so, our tester comfortably carried 22 pounds with it, so you won’t sacrifice too much in the way of comfort. The Allpa is also significantly burlier, thanks to its TPU-coated, 840-denier shell. When it comes to organization, the Allpa again takes the edge with a mesh zippered divider that secures clothes and gear more effectively than the Farpoint’s internal straps. We also appreciate its water bottle sleeve, a feature the Farpoint omits. Both packs have stowable shoulder straps and hipbelts, but only the Farpoint offers external compression straps. But the Allpa remains a sleeker, more compact model that fits more easily into tight spaces, such as overhead compartments. Unless you’re a die-hard Osprey fan who values a more robust suspension, the extra $25 for the Allpa is money well spent. For more, read our Allpa 35L Travel Pack review.
With its robust harness and internal frame, the Farpoint carries loads and covers distances most competitors can’t match. But while it excels in comfort, this pack’s organization falls short, and its build quality is merely average.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
The Router is one of the most comfortable packs we’ve tested, even when it’s stuffed full. It also offers ample organization and trims the bulk found in many packs with similar capacities, but we aren’t huge fans of its lackluster breathability and thin construction.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
The Allpa’s fun colors might catch your eye, but behind its looks is a smartly designed travel pack that can handle heavy loads and withstand lots of use. While its straightforward organizational layout works well for most, some users might prefer a more comprehensive setup, though.
Comfort & Support
Organization
Durability
Water Resistance
Weight & Size
Sustainability
If your top priority is carrying comfort—especially with loads north of 25 pounds—we think the Osprey Farpoint 40 is the best bet in this category. It has the most supportive suspension we’ve tested, and the adjustable torso length makes it easier to get a truly dialed fit. Just know you’re trading away some travel conveniences, mostly in the organization and ruggedness departments. But for backpacking-style travel where your bag lives on your back, the Farpoint is hard to beat.
gear up and go
Gear Guide
Best Duffel Bags of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Daypacks of 2026Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2026Gear Guide
Best Camping Tents of 2026Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2026Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2026Gear Guide
Best Backpacking Sleeping Bags of 2026