Average Sustainability Score
Good
Updated:
Jul 21, 2026With its extensive use of recycled materials and comprehensive circularity initiatives, The North Face has made steady progress in reducing its environmental impact. Through programs like its Renewed resale and recycling platform and the growing, fully-recyclable Circular Design collection, the brand is working to keep its products in play longer. Still, it trails leading competitors in key areas, including curbing its greenhouse gas emissions and providing comprehensive repair services outside of warranty. Dive in here for the full low-down on sustainability at The North Face.
This sustainability analysis evaluates both product- and brand-level initiatives to capture the full scope of The North Face’s efforts to reduce its environmental impact. Our research draws from The North Face’s published sustainability data, other reputable sources, third-party certifications (a cornerstone of our process), and correspondence with brand representatives. We have independently researched over 30 The North Face products to date and counting, giving us a broad understanding of the brand’s use of low-impact materials, chemistry, and manufacturing practices.
You can also explore our analyses of other outdoor brands, or use our advanced search to find products that align with your sustainability values.
The North Face earns a Good transparency rating for its sustainability efforts. Product-level sustainability information on its website is clear, detailed, and easy to access, with little room for confusion. However, transparency beyond the product level is more limited. While the brand shares information about its materials, circularity, and emissions on its website, its parent company, VF Corporation, publishes a single impact report covering all of its brands rather than a dedicated report for The North Face. As a result, the brand provides less detailed sustainability reporting than some of its competitors. Still, representatives at the brand have been highly responsive to our inquiries, helping us fill the gaps in our understanding.
When it comes to replacing virgin materials with recycled ones, The North Face stands out as an industry leader. Recycled materials typically offer performance comparable to their virgin counterparts while producing a significantly smaller carbon footprint, and well over three-quarters of The North Face products we've researched incorporate them—most commonly recycled polyester and nylon. In 2024 (the most recent data available), the brand reported that more than 95% of the polyester and 80% of the nylon it used came from recycled, responsibly sourced, or renewable materials, up from 85% and 75%, respectively, in 2023. Across all VF Corporation brands, 64% of the polyester used in 2024 came from recycled sources. The North Face is also certified to the Global Recycled Standard, providing third-party verification of its recycled content claims.
The North Face originally aimed to source 100% recycled, responsibly sourced, or regeneratively grown polyester, nylon, and cotton by 2025 but fell just short of that goal. It has since expanded its target, committing to source 100% low-impact polyester, nylon, cotton, leather, and elastane by 2030. We hope to see it achieve its target in the coming years.
Although The North Face has been a Bluesign System Partner since 2008, the brand incorporates very few Bluesign-approved materials into its products. Participation in the Bluesign system ensures textiles and products meet strict standards for chemical safety, emissions, and environmental responsibility. While any brand can source Bluesign-approved fabrics, becoming a System Partner signals a stronger commitment to responsible chemistry, with on-site assessments every two to three years. Typically, Bluesign System Partners use a large share of these approved materials, but surprisingly, we have yet to review any The North Face products that incorporate them. Neither VF Corporation nor The North Face reports on its total use of Bluesign-approved fabrics, leaving a gap in our understanding of sustainability at The North Face.
VF Corporation has a chemical management program called Chem-IQ, which helps its brands prevent the use of hazardous chemicals in products. All VF brands abide by its Restricted Substance List, which sets restrictions and testing limits on hazardous substances.
PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, were once the outdoor industry standard for durable water-repellent (DWR) treatments and waterproof membranes due to their exceptional water-repellent properties. However, due to their health risks and subsequent bans in states like California and New York, many outdoor brands—including The North Face—are taking steps to rid their product lines of these so-called “forever chemicals.” In 2021, The North Face’s parent company, VF Corporation, announced that it would phase PFAS out of its products.
Midway through 2025, The North Face reported that it achieved its goal of eliminating its use of PFAS in its products; now, all new The North Face styles are PFAS free. Other brands are on a similar trajectory and timeline: Patagonia completed its PFAS phase-out in early 2025, and Arc’teryx is on track to finish its phase-out by the end of the year. Still, other outdoor brands such as Fjallraven and Keen were well ahead of the curve, phasing PFAS out of their products in 2015 and 2018, respectively.
In partnership with Textile Exchange, The North Face helped launch the Responsible Down Standard (RDS) in 2014. The standard ensures animal welfare and traceability from farm to finished product. Today, all of the brand’s virgin down is certified to the RDS, although we appreciate that it also uses recycled down in many of its products. Additionally, in 2025, 90% of VF Corporation footwear leather came from Leather Working Group-certified tanneries, ensuring that the leather meets the group’s chemical management and environmental standards (down from 100% in 2024). Across VF Corporation brands, approximately 95% of the wool used is certified to the ZQ Standard, which ensures the welfare of sheep and the land they graze on. The remaining wool, which is not certified to these standards, is typically purchased from auctions, which limits traceability. VF Corporation also sources nearly 95% of its cotton from the United States, Australia, or farms participating in third-party programs that promote environmental or social sustainability. However, it does not disclose how much of that cotton is organically grown. The company has also committed to increasing its use of regenerative cotton but has not reported how much of its cotton currently comes from regenerative farms.
Although VF Corporation conducts internal supplier audits, we found no evidence that The North Face utilizes third-party audit or certification programs. The brand does not participate in programs such as Fair Trade or Fair Wear to ensure safe working conditions and reduce the environmental impact of its factories. While The North Face participates in the International Labour Organization’s Better Work Program and the Social and Labor Convergence Program (SLCP) for some audits, it largely adheres to its own standards and policies. Better Work does not provide official certification or grading, and SLCP audits are generally not conducted annually. Without certification or grading, there is no clear assurance that factories uphold specific standards, leaving it largely up to the brand to make changes.
To meet our criteria, brands must participate in a third-party program that includes annual audits to ensure safe working conditions, fair wages, and a reduced environmental impact. We also require that suppliers be evaluated and scored against specific standards. Without such participation, The North Face does not meet our responsible manufacturing standard. Still, we appreciate that VF Corporation offers a Worker and Community Development program, through which the company has improved the lives of one million workers through programs addressing childcare and education, health and nutrition, and water and sanitation.
To reduce waste, The North Face launched a variety of packaging pilot programs in 2024. The initiatives were first tested in the United Kingdom in 2022 before expanding to all of the brand's distribution centers across Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. These efforts include shipping gloves without poly bags, sending select footwear in shoeboxes only, and reducing or eliminating plastic poly bags where possible. By 2024, The North Face had shipped more than 2 million products without plastic poly bags. The brand has also replaced all of its virgin plastic poly bags with recycled alternatives and is working to eliminate poly bags from additional product categories. Unfortunately, it does not publish information about its other e-commerce packaging materials.
In-store, The North Face swapped most of its plastic bags for Forest Stewardship Council-certified ones, which are made from paper sourced from sustainably managed forests and recycled materials. Additionally, the brand collects poly bags for recycling at its North American retail locations, diverting almost 78,000 pounds of plastic waste since the program’s inception.
The North Face offers free repairs under its limited lifetime warranty and replaces covered products when a fix isn’t possible. However, footwear and The North Face Renewed products are covered under a one-year warranty rather than the lifetime one that applies to outerwear, backpacks, and gear. Through its warranty program, The North Face can patch tears, replace zippers, repair snaps, replace garment panels, fix seams, and more. The brand also provides replacement buckles upon request, but offers limited information about other replacement parts. While we appreciate that The North Face offers repairs, similar brands like Norrøna and Patagonia provide more detailed information on the types of repairs they can complete. Additionally, the brand does not offer customer-paid repairs: only products that are covered under the brand’s warranty are eligible. This means that damage arising from accidents or normal wear and tear are not eligible, marking a gap in the brand’s repair offerings.
Buying used is one of the best ways to reduce your environmental impact, and The North Face makes it easy through its Renewed resale platform. Between the program's launch and 2025, the brand sold more than 96,000 used products. To participate, simply trade in your clean, wearable gear by mail or at a participating store. The North Face inspects each item before listing it for sale, washing, repairing, and refurbishing products as needed. (Items with significant wear, rips, stains, or pilling are not accepted.) Depending on the condition of your gear, you'll receive $10–$50 in store credit. If an item can't be resold, The North Face donates, recycles, or upcycles it instead. The platform also includes returned, damaged, and defective products, helping keep even more gear out of landfills.
The North Face upcycles gear that cannot be recycled or donated, featured in its Remade collection, available for purchase online. The collection features one-of-a-kind vests, chalk bags, and more, made from old The North Face products. In 2024, the brand also introduced its Circular Design collection—a growing line of products designed for easy disassembly and recycling at the end of their lives. Together, these programs demonstrate The North Face's strong commitment to keeping products in use for as long as possible and building a more circular product lifecycle.
The North Face’s parent company, VF Corporation, tracks and reports on its emissions. VF began measuring its Scope 1 and 2 emissions (from owned assets and purchased electricity) in 2009, the same year it published its first annual impact report. It later expanded its reporting to include Scope 3 emissions, or those generated throughout its supply chain, which now account for approximately 99% of its total carbon footprint. In 2019, the parent company set Science Based Targets Initiative-verified goals to reduce its absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 55% and Scope 3 emissions by 30% by 2030 compared to its 2017 baseline. VF also aims to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 (defined as a 90% reduction in emissions). VF reports both its absolute emissions and carbon intensity annually, though it does not provide a year-over-year breakdown of those figures.
Unfortunately, VF has not made any progress toward its Scope 3 reduction goal—in 2024, its Scope 3 emissions from purchased goods and services and transportation were 19% higher than its 2017 baseline. Because these supply chain emissions account for roughly 99% of the company's total footprint, overall emissions remain well above the level needed to meet its climate targets. During the same period, however, VF reduced its Scope 1 and 2 emissions—which account for only about 1% of its footprint—by 29% compared to 2017. In total, VF emitted well over 5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO₂e) in 2024, approximately five times REI's total footprint. Because The North Face does not report its own greenhouse gas emissions separately, it is impossible to determine what share of VF Corporation's total emissions is attributable to the brand.
The North Face’s parent company, VF Corporation, publishes an annual impact report detailing the sustainability performance of its many subsidiary brands. Unlike Arc'teryx, which also operates under a parent company but publishes its own impact report, The North Face relies entirely on VF for sustainability reporting. As a result, it is difficult to track the brand's progress on materials, chemical management, and greenhouse gas emissions. The 2025 VF report highlighted metrics such as low-impact material statistics, emissions data, packaging initiatives, and circularity programs, but data is limited when compared to similar, large parent companies (like Deckers Brands). In addition to sustainability content, the VF report covers its progress toward improving working conditions at its suppliers. Overall, the report covers the major sustainability topics we evaluate, but we would like to see more detailed reporting specific to The North Face.
The North Face is an Outdoor Industry Association Climate Action Corps member. The Outdoor Industry Association is a collective of brands that collaborate to develop sustainability initiatives, engage in policy discussions, and advocate for the outdoor industry on various topics. The Climate Action Corps is a coalition working towards reducing the outdoor industry’s carbon footprint by 50% by 2030, with the goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. Additionally, for the past 15 years, The North Face has operated The Explore Fund, which funds nonprofit organizations focused on conservation and expanding outdoor access. As of 2025, however, the program is undergoing a revamp to expand its reach. The North Face is also a member of The Microfibre Consortium, an organization working to reduce plastic microfiber pollution from outdoor gear.
Top Rated
Deep Dive
These products are among the most sustainable on the market and earn our Better Trail Certified distinction. They often meet 80% or more of our sustainability criteria for their category.
These products are solid, middle-of-the-pack options for sustainability. In general, they meet at least half of our sustainability criteria for their category.
These products are among the least sustainable in their product category and have significant room for improvement. Most meet about 25% or less of our sustainability criteria.
The world of sustainability can be murky, but Better Trail is here to help bring clarity. We’ve exhaustively researched thousands of outdoor gear products, communicated with brands, and created a detailed and rigorous ratings system to bring it all together for you. At the pinnacle is Better Trail Certified.
Better Trail Certified products score 4 out of 5 or higher in our sustainability ratings and generally meet around 80% or more of our criteria. While it’s true that no product is 100% sustainable—all take resources to create and arrive at your doorstep—these products are industry leaders and among the most sustainable on the market.
Brand Article
How Sustainable is Patagonia?Brand Article
How Sustainable is Fjallraven?Brand Article
How Sustainable is Black Diamond?Brand Article
How Sustainable is REI?Brand Article
How Sustainable is Arc’teryx?Brand Article
How Sustainable is Stio?Brand Article
How Sustainable is Columbia?Brand Article
How Sustainable is Nemo Equipment?